On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:50:43AM +0100, jolly wrote:
yes, i missed that. but IIRC, it must be set on non-PCS cells (i.a. 850 or 900) to indicate whether neighbor ARFCN of 512... refer to PCS. on a PCS BTS it should be ignored by MS.
right, as PCS/DCS is not allowed I take a look during the SI generation and check if that bts is a DCS/PCS unit and set the indicator.
In terms of VTY we need to add consistency checks at the time of a 'write' call and after loading. But this is not limited to the DCS/PCS code.
if (n) ... si2->bcch_frequency_list[0] |= 0x20; si2b->bcch_frequency_list[0] |= 0x20;
if there are frequencies defined in si2bis, the EXT-IND is set on both (si2 and si2bis) lists. if not, the si2bis is removed and not transmitted.
true. I was confused and thought EXT-IND is set for SI2ter as well. But this is signalled in the SI3 rest octets. SI5ter doesn't appear to be signalled at all.
greetings from Iceland holger