12 Apr
2016
12 Apr
'16
10:49 p.m.
Hi Neels,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:17:34PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
Please let me know after how many compilatiosn the trade-off woudl trip
towards actually addressing those warnings in fixing the related code.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:23:52AM +0200, Harald Welte
wrote:
Sorry.
Hi Max,
It was me, not Max :) will just mean
that we all forget about having to fix it.
Maybe instead of numerous unused variables, we should have a single
#warning then. Every warning hinders my dev cycle. For pretty much every
compilation, I have to parse/browse the list of warnings, *all* the time. Even a #warning would stare me in the face for every
build. There are a
couple of those already.
Well, if everyone every so often would address one of them, it wouldn't
be so bad :)
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)