23 Oct
2014
23 Oct
'14
2:39 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, ☎ wrote:
Good catch, I didn't notice it. Maybe we should
just use size_t for all the length
functions in libosmo*? That's what size_t was invented for after all :)
> it looks like a candidate for ping-pong games on
32bit/64bit userland
> on GNU/Linux. What is the type here? unsigned int - size_t?
I can't quote the ISO C specification. So what type is the result of
"unsigned int - size_t"? We have size_t, off_t, ptrdiff_t as potential
types. I don't know which is the right one. :)