I implemented https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3880 to use indenting for vty implicit
'exit'.
There's one thing I'm sneaking in there though which I'd like to mention before
I merge:
The patch is storing vty parent node state. This state not only stores previous
indenting, but it also stores the parent's 'node' id and 'priv' data (the
node's object), and puts these back in place after going to a parent.
So far our go_parent_cb()s set these, and AFAIK all of them simply put the
parent's exact node and priv pointer back in place. But technically, a
go_parent_cb() *could* do some magic like going to a completely different node,
or re-creating a new priv pointer. By overwriting from stored state, we will
override such behavior.
I think we want this to happen from stored state in the future, and drop most
of the go_parent_cb(). Does everyone agree?
~N
Hi All,
Is there a way to configure the “ms max power” to a dynamic value depending on the distance of the mobile phone to the base station?
For now, the default value is 12. Meaning, the base station is telling the mobile phone to transmit in the power of 12dBm either the phone is besides the base station or on the edge of the base station.
If not, is there a roadmap on configuring it with a dynamic or auto value?
TIA.
Best Regard,
Ron Menez
ron.menez(a)entropysolution.com<mailto:ron.menez@entropysolution.com>
Hi ,
OsmoBTS version 0.6.0.6-ae13
OpenBSC version 0.15.0.885-968a6
I flow the instructions from wiki page and create config files :
https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/SDR_OsmoTRX_netwo…
but when i run :
osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg -l ~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3 -P -C
--debug=DRLL:DCC:DMM:DRR:DRSL:DNM
I got this error :
There is no such command.
Error occurred during reading the below line:
timer t3103 0
<0005> ../../../src/libbsc/bsc_init.c:536 Failed to parse the config
file: '/home/ashtum/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg'
Reading config failed. Exiting.
Similarly when i run :
osmo-bts-trx -c ~/.osmocom/osmo-bts.cfg
I got :
((*))
|
/ \ OsmoBTS
There is no such command.
Error occurred during reading the below line:
fn-advance 20
% rtp bind-ip is now deprecated
Failed to parse the config file: '/home/ashtum/.osmocom/osmo-bts.cfg'
Hello,
I have installed the open openbsc.deb but when I am trying to run it using
the command "osmo-bsc" its giving me the following error
<0005> bsc_init.c:536 Failed to parse the config file: 'openbsc.cfg'
Bootstrapping the network failed. exiting.
full talloc report on 'sccp' (total 1 bytes in 1 blocks)
Please help me solve it.
Thanks
Anindya
Dear all,
for probably about a year (or longer) we have been putting up with VTY
tests which cause builds to break under unclear circumstances. I personally
believe the probability of a VTY test failing has recently increased again,
and this is barely tolerable anymore. Often, rebasing/cherry-picking the given
patch one or two times also doesn't work. Yet, the given patch-under-test
is not even touching anything related to VTY, like
In https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3899 which has failed in
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/OpenBSC-gerrit/2451/ and
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/OpenBSC-gerrit/2454/
I know Neels and others have spend already significant time in the past trying
to resolve this - unsuccessfully.
So I think the situation has reached a point where we should disable the vty
tests, or at least the specific part of the vty tests that is known to break
most frequently.
I definitely want us to have *more* testing, not less. However, when the test
itself is not stable yet - particularly after that much time - we cannot
have that buggy test delay our development.
I would vote for running those tests regularly (daily, every few hours, you name
it), but not as part of the mandatory build verification for gerrit V+1.
What do others think?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:01:23AM +0200, Pau Espin Pedrol wrote:
> today I found the same issue again in prod (/sierra_2 -> /sierra_4).
> Interestingly, both /sierra_2 and /sierra_3 seem to be using the same
> firmware. dmesg shows again a disconnect from the usb port.
We have this idea of giving the same modem a persistent name on ofono, which
would solve the symptoms, but it's curious why this happens.
I had the watchdog script in place that power cycles the quad modem board and
restarts ofono as soon as the modem names mismatch what we expect. But lynxis
disabled it. The reasoning is that we won't catch ofono errors. That may be
true; my idea was to be able automatically recover ofono without manual
intervention. I guess it all depends on how closely you (lynxis) watch the gsm
testers for failures? Because my focus is not particularly on ofono, and when I
hit a broken situation and need to test things, I will restart ofono and rather
not in-depth investigate the failure; in a dismissive way "come on ofono, do
what I want now." What do you guys think about this?
> I guess only /sierra_2 crashes because it's the first modem in the
> resources.conf list and thus it is usually used in all tests (for instance,
> tests which require only 1 modem), and probably some of the steps done in
> one of those tests is crashing the modem.
Something I thought about before: we could implement a kind of random or round
robin to not always pick the first matching resources in the list. Advantage is
that we would cycle through the hardware and force us to precisely formulate
e.g. modem requirements. The disadvantage is that not every test is run exactly
the same, adding complexity that may obscure analysis. i.e. to reproduce a run
on a particular modem, we would have to somehow clamp that randomness, e.g.
log a random seed at the start and allow passing in a random seed on the
cmdline.
~N
Dear List
I am trying to run osmocomBB with motorola c118 with openbsc.I tried to get
openbsc network on my phone it works well and I am able to register on
openbsc network.
But when i try to run osmocomBB with openBSC i am not able to get network.
Also when i run rssi firmware on c118 phone i get network and its working
fine.
I am using default configuration file for OpenBSC and using NanoBTS with
1800Mhz support.
Is there any configuration change is needed in openBSC ?
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Dear guys,
anyone can help me, Im using osmo-gsm-tester osmo-bts.cfg and openbsc.cfg
also/
BTS is up and auth policy accept-all is set and even I add subscriber IMSI,
but my phone still cannot register on the network.
my setup is LimeSDR and using the latest osmo-bts and openbsc with OpenUSRP.
do you think its a hardware issue?
please help! Thanks
--
best regards,
DUO
Hi.
The OsmoBTS build depends (unfortunately) on OpenBSC because it uses
gsm_data_shared.h header. ATM this file is available in osmo-bsc and osmo-msc (maybe
other split repos as well). Which is the "canonical" one from OsmoBTS point of view?
Also, when would be the right time to move OsmoBTS' jenkins job to use one of the
split repos instead of old OpenBSC?
--
Max Suraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
Hi Blobb,
I'd like to probe your opinion on a discussion we had today about our
jenkins. So far our setup was manual, and we would like to (somewhat)
automate the process of providing build dependencies on slaves.
One solution that was discussed longer than others would be to use docker.
Each of our repositories that need a build would have their own docker
file, containing the complete setup of dependencies. The idea is that
anyone can easily setup an identical build on any new jenkins build slave
or even at home; no complex config of the jenkins build slave is needed.
The point being, if we adopt docker in such a way, it would be logical to
make use of the docker cache to save unnecessary rebuilds. It is a generic
solution instead our artifact store.
I feel a bit bad for accepting your contributions, doing review and
keeping you busy, just to then talk about docker to solve the problem
instead; I appreciate your presence and would like to keep you involved.
Interestingly enough, we are experimenting with the artifact store on that
one build job that has already been using docker for quite some time...
(It was for the separate network space, not really for artifacts.)
In any case, I would like to include you in the discussion, and maybe you
would also like to be involved in maturing the idea? Until now it is still
wild and no-one has taken actual steps.
An example to follow would be laforge's recently added
https://git.osmocom.org/docker-playground/tree/
One interesting bit is that it has a method to check whether a given git
branch has changed, and rebuilds the docker image only if it has:
https://git.osmocom.org/docker-playground/tree/osmo-ggsn-master/Dockerfile#…
ADD http://git.osmocom.org/openggsn/patch/?h=laforge/osmo-ggsn /tmp/commit
This line fetches the given URL (in this case the latest patch on that
branch) and considers the docker image as unchanged if that URL shows the
same as last time. As soon as a new patch shows, things are rebuilt.
In this sense we could have docker images cascading on top of each other,
adding individual dependencies and reusing identical states auto-detected
by docker. All build steps would be in the Dockerfile.
For builds that aren't used by other builds (like the "final" programs,
osmo-msc, osmo-sgsn, osmo-bsc,...) we don't need to store the result, so
don't need to include the program's build in the Dockerfile: on a docker
image with all dependencies, run the final build step by invoking 'docker
run', like we currently do for the OpenBSC-gerrit job, and then just
discard the changes.
Remotely related: we have the osmo-gsm-tester that is running binaries
produced by jenkins to do automated tests on real GSM hardware. Currently
we compile and tar the binaries, copy them over, extract, set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH and run: a bit tedious and problematic e.g. for
mismatching debian versions. This could be simplified by docker by
guaranteeing a fixed operating system around the binary, actually using
hub.docker.com (or maybe one day a private docker hub) instead of copying
over binary tars manually, sharing across any number of build slaves, and
with the added bonus of having the resulting binaries run in a separate
network space.
As I said, on the one hand I appreciate our work on the artifact store, on
the other hand the docker way undeniably makes for a good overall solution
to simplify things in general, with artifact re-use coming "for free"...
One advantage of the artifact store though is that the artifacts we manage
are not entire debian installations but just a few libs and executables in
a tiny tar.
What is your opinion?
~N
