Hi!
I just realized that since OsmoCon was discontinued after 2018 didn't
result in sufficient turn-out, and only the 2017 incarnation contained
some entry-level talks, we actually only have introductory level
presentations / videos about a setup that still covers OsmoNITB.
(https://media.ccc.de/v/osmocon17-4002-running_a_basic_circuit_switched_osmo…)
This may or may not be a reason why some people still want to set up OsmoNITB
in 2020. While our wiki and user manuals all have deprecated OsmoNITB years ago,
people who only look for videos might be mislead.
Also, I'm sure that several other presentation (like the one about 3G / osmo-iuh before
the CNI split) would similarly benefit from an update.
So I think we should try to create/update some slide decks and record related
lectures / tutorials at some point this year. I wouldn't bother setting up a
virtual conference or some kind of remote interaction at this point. Recording
some talks and/or screencasts allows us to create and release them one-by-one.
I would like to get started by collecting a list of topics at https://osmocom.org/issues/4578
before we start to actually work on the presentations.
One question is also how to record, but let's first work on the content before
we worry about recording and publication.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi all,
as was noticed during the weekly review, all TTCN-3 BSC test cases from
LCLS group are failing since build #987 (May 29) [1], so I am trying to
investigate this.
Until now I thought that it's somehow related to my IPA/RSL refactoring
patch set, so I spent half of a day reading the code of those test cases
and trying to figure out what could be the reason. But then I checked
ttcn3-bsc-test-latest [2]. I should have done this first, of course.
Magically all LCLS test cases are green there.
So I assume that it's not related to the recent IPA/RSL changes, and
most likely caused by recent changes to osmo-bsc and/or libosmo-*. I
already tried to downgrade osmo-bsc to v1.6.0 (Jan 3) with no luck.
If anyone was working on something related to RSL, MGCP or LCLS, please
let me know - this might help to find the problem faster. Thanks!
[1] https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/view/TTCN3/job/ttcn3-bsc-test/
[2]
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/view/TTCN3/job/ttcn3-bsc-test-latest/
--
- Vadim Yanitskiy <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
Hi all,
we need to wrap up the DGSM work and get it to a state that can be merged to
master.
There are still open issues that I am not sure how to solve, which I've
mentioned on some occasions, but it seems to not have been loud enough.
I would easily choose one way, but am not sure about others' opinions.
(1) One open point is the GSUP peer identification. I've added a comment
explaining it in https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16459/9
Me personally, I would strip down basically all of that complexity again and go
with the simplest solution, a nul terminated size limited char string for GSUP
peer id. The patch became what it is because vague requirements were thrown in
the mix and I tried to accomodate them, and now it ended up being a rather ugly
shim around a simple char string, really.
(2) Another open question is the freeing behavior in osmo_gsup_req (for proper
async handling of DGSM, and to ensure proper GSUP responses). I've added a
comment explaining that in https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16205/29
The gist for both issues is that I could write patches that would have a large
ripple effect throug many files and follow-up patches, but if we again disagree
on the outcome, the work would multiply.
So, DGSM works and is ready, except that we need to agree on what will be
accepted by review. I need opinions to be able to complete this (or possibly a
"go" to do whatever I think is right and merge that).
Thanks!
~N
Hello:
I installed the osmo-NITB on ubuntu18.04, including
osmo-trx,osmo-bts,and openbsc.
I run these three applications in three terminals successively, it seems
ok, but the tx/rx leds on usrp-b210 hardware platform are not lighted,
and the print message in the osmo-trx terminal shows :
Thu Apr 30 15:28:28 2020 DTRXCTRL <0002> Transceiver.cpp:832
[tid=139871716352896][chan=0] command is 'POWEROFF'
Thu Apr 30 15:28:28 2020 DTRXCTRL <0002> Transceiver.cpp:977
[tid=139871716352896][chan=0] response is 'RSP POWEROFF 0'
I try to send some commands on another terminal which launch a telnet
session which connects to the osmo-bts control interface(port number is
4238) , but it not working.
what can i do next?
thanks a lot.
$ git clone git://git.osmocom.org/osmo-trx $ git branch * master $
./configure ... checking for LIBOSMOCORE... no configure: error: Package
requirements (libosmocore >= 1.3.0) were not met: No package
'libosmocore' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment
variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Then, check
the information of libosmocore: $dpkg -l |grep libosmocore ii
libosmocore:amd64 0.9.0-7 amd64 Open Source MObile COMmunications CORE
library (metapackage) ii libosmocore6:amd64 0.9.0-7 amd64 Osmo Core
library $ sudo apt-get install libosmocore ... libosmocore has already
been the newest version (0.9.0-7)。 why???what can i do?
Appreciate that the Osmocom Docker configurations exist principally for
automated testing and here it may not make sense, but I wondered if
builds are published to a registry?
The Makefile in the make project located in the docker-playground repo
sets docker.io as registry and has a target for docker push. Also see
OBS Release.key files in project sub-directories, but couldn't find
container builds being published anywhere.
Was hoping I could just pull containers for the latest project versions,
without cloning and building the containers in docker-playground.
Also saw the comments from 2017 on Docker shortcomings and assuming SCTP
works OK now in Docker networking?
Regards,
Andrew
Dear Mr. Welte,
In order to be more familiar with the further development of the osmo-euse file, I need to know which libraries and which programming style I should use to be on the right track.
Is it possible to provide me please the some lines of your code which is sending the USSD code via the GSUP client to hlr and called up data from OSMO-HLR?
I need this for my master's thesis (Education Purpose), so I don't need a license for it.
Many thanks for your consideration,
Reza