OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

6 participants
4179 discussions

GSM license approval for HAR2009
by Harald Welte 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Hi! For those who are planning to attend HAR2009 (http://har2009.org/): We have just received regulatory approval for four ARFCN in the GSM900 band during HAR2009. The Power on each ARFCN for BTS and MS is restricted to 100mW. There are also some GSM1800 ARFCN's that we can use with up to 200mW, though I don't yet know their values and how many. I have created a wiki page at https://wiki.har2009.org/page/GSM for further coordination of GSM related activities at HAR2009. It would be great to know which other OpenBSC users/hackers will be present at the event. As there are multiple things that I'm planning to do at HAR2009, I would be happy about any help that I might get from you guys. Basically there will be * A 'stable' GSM network with BS-11 and OpenBSC for people to test their phone interoperability with OpenBSC by making/receiving calls and SMS. * A nanoBTS1800 for use by OpenBSC hackers only to test/fix OpenBSC stuff before putting it on the BS-11 'stable' network * work on airprobe. Especially for the 'stable' network, there is a lot of help required, among others: * physical setup of the BS-11 * registration of mobile phones into the network. It would probably be good to have a setup where people can plug their SIM into a SIM card reader (or phone that can read the IMSI). We can then create the SQL entry with their IMSI and extension. * making sure the network runs and OpenBSC / hfcmulti gets restarted in case something hangs. Please just respond to this mail if you want to help in any way. Regards, -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

4 11

Re: application TCH support for nanoBTS
by Dieter Spaar 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Hello Harald, On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:52 +0200, "Harald Welte" <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote: > > Using this mode, I have created a pcap file with OML+RSL bringup, followed by > one call between two MS (extn. 1005 calls 1003) where all RTP/RTCP packets are > visible. The call uses EFR, since that is hardcoded in many places all over > OpenBSC at the moment. > > The pcap file is available from > http://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/trac/attachment/wiki/nanoBTS/ipaccess-startup… I just took a quick look at the dump with Wireshark, its possible to safe the raw RTP payload from within Wireshark and it looks OK (31-byte EFR packages starting with 0xC in the high nibble). However I have no ready-made EFR decoder available so I can't decode the speech. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

1 0

ip.access RTP setup details
by Harald Welte 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Hi! While writing the RTP proxy, I've been playing with the ip.access RTP related code for quite a bit. This is as far as I have understood it so far: Setting up a voice call (for one MS) * sending IPACCESS_BIND via RSL, specifying * the GSM channel number IE * the IP speech mode IE, indicating * 0x1- : uni-directional, rx-only * 0x-1 : EFR (0: FR, 2: AMR) * receiving IPACCESS_BIND_ACK via RSL, specifying * the GSM channel number IE * the ip.access connection identifier * the locally-bound UDP port for RTP * the locally-bound IP address for RTP * optionally: the RTP payload type * sending IPACCESS_CONNECT via RSL, specifying * the GSM channel number IE * the ip.access connection identifier (from BIND_ACK) * the remote UDP port number for RTP * the remote IP address for RTP * the IP speech mode IE, indicating * 0x0-: bi-directional * 0x-1: EFR (0: FR, 2: AMR) * optionally: the RTP payload type, if BIND_CAK specified it Misc observations: * if BIND is called with IP speech mode IE 0x10 (uni-directional FR), then no RTP payload type is returned in BIND_ACK. Instead, the standard type for GSM 06.10 (0x03) is used in the packets. * I'm not sure which RTP payload type (and IP speech mode) is which, i.e. if the payload type of BIND/BIND_ACK specifies "expect this payload type for incoming packets" or "use this payload type for all RTP packets originated by this side" -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

Re: CCCH
by Dieter Spaar 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Hello Eric, On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:52:17 +0200, "Eric Cathelinaud" <e.cathelinaud(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > If nothing possible I will try to deal with the 470ms period. > Can you tell me if the mobile will RACH at each paging request or if it can > miss some? If the MS receives a paging request for itself and is allowed to access the network, than it will start the immediate assign procedure (The details are in GSM 04.08, a good overview with reference to the specification is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Um_Interface, many thanks to David Burgess for writing it down). The MS will not react on further paging request as long as the immediate assign procedure is running. > I already saw in OpenBSC that the paging request is sometimes send more than > once for a call so I am not sure. May be it could be something to fixe in > the code? Or the phone sometimes doesn't react as it should? The BSC can't be sure that a single paging request is received by the MS so it (optionally) has to repeat it (there can be distortions, weak signal and so on). > Normally the RACH is sent 3 time slots after the paging request right? I don't think so, the RACH is always on TS0 of the uplink (at least this is how I understand it) and the PCH is not necessarily on TS0 (depending on the configuration). The reaction of the MS surley depends on the firmware/hardware of the phone and how fast it works, so you don't have a fixed delay. The MS usually has enough time to react, the T3113 timer defines how long to wait for a PAGING RESPONSE and than optionally repeat the paging request (if and how often the paging request is repeated, is not defined in the specification). I don't have exact numbers for the T3113 timer because its up to network, but common values seems to be around 5 seconds. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

2 1

Re: mISDNdebugtool status
by Dieter Spaar 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Hello Eric, On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:35:33 +0200, "Eric Cathelinaud" <e.cathelinaud(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > I would like to ask another question. I can see on which time slot the burst > is sent but i can't see the frame and the multiframe number. Is it available > somewhere? Not in the Abis communication, its the BTS which cares about frames but not the BSC. For the nanoBTS it is most certainly possible to get debug traces from the debug port (but probably not on Abis) which contain the frame number, but I am not aware that the same is possible for the BS-11. If you are interested in this low-level Layer 1 stuff, you might have a look at OpenBTS, you can adjust nearly everything or trace at a really low level. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

3 8

Just starting!!
by raza shah 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Hi folks, I hope this finds you all in the best of health. As a start, I have read some basic GSM articles and went through bsc_hack.c. Few questions are bugging me and I would appreciate some info regarding them: (1) With which type(s) of BTS does OpenBSC work? (2) What is OML NM? (3) What is the best way to follow the path in the code in case of a call? Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx

3 2

Re: wireshark, viewing Abis communication
by Dieter Spaar 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Hello Nordin, On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:11:56 +0200, "Nordin" <bouchtaoui(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I downloaded the latest developer's Wireshark 1.1.3, with no result. I > know it's easy asking for an Abis-parser, but I thought there was a > patch for it. If you take one of the latest daily automated Wireshark builds it will work, even on Windows. No need to compile the sources if you don't want to. I use "1.3.0-SVN-29061" and it contains Harald's patch for the nanoBTS. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

2 2

wireshark, viewing Abis communication
by Eric Cathelinaud 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Hi, I am trying to deal with wireshark to understand what happening in each function in the code. It says that the file seems to be corrupted: "The capture files appears to be damaged or corrupted. (libpcap: LAPD file has a 15-byte packet, too small to have even a LAPD pseudo-header)" Is it a problem? I still can read the Abis communication. I saw that some rsl packets are malformed. Is it coming from a missing implementation in the code that need to be fixed? Thanks Eric

4 17

AW: HAR2009 TODO list
by Andreas.Eversberg 26 Jul '09

26 Jul '09

>On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:26:14AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> I'm currently in the train, so forgive me posting the initial TODO list >> to the mailing list rather than the wiki. > >this is now at http://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/trac/wiki/HAR2009 Check out Eventphone. They run DECT network. Why not linking to their network? I am not at HAR, but I can help setting it up. An extra E1 card is required to link to Eventphone's machine... http://www.eventphone.de/guru/?language=de

2 1

Looking for 32.768MHz OCXO for BS-11 calibration
by Harald Welte 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Hi! So for everyone who has problems with BS-11 clock accuracy, what would be the theoretical straight-forward way to solve the problem, is to replace the 32.768MHz crystal oscillator on the E1 card with a OCXO of the same frequency. So what we're looking for is an OCXO with +/- 0.05ppm or higher stability for 3.3V power supply. Unfortunately I was not able to find one at that frequency, even digikey doesn't have one. If anyone can find a source for a OCXO in the abovementioned parameter range (and small quantities), I think quite a number of people would be interested in buying one and connecting it to their E1 boards. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks! -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC