OpenBSC December 2025

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

26 participants
43 discussions

ip.access nano 3G S8 Configuration
by John Thewlis - Meath Broadband 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

We are trying to setup this AP as part of the 3.5G Osmocom project. We have the software stack operational and are now preparing the nano for testing. When we try to login via telnet at port 8090 we are getting a constant refusal to connect:- root@osm/openbsc/openbsc/src/ipaccess# telnet 192.168.192.30 8090 Trying 192.168.192.30... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused The device seems to be locked as indicated by the leds on the front panel. We have tried resetting the nano to see if this would help but to no avail. Any ideas as to how to access the device for initial configuration?. Thanks John

6 6

Is It Worth It to Pay Someone to Take My Online CompTIA Exam?
by olivianaylor322＠gmail.com 09 Apr '26

09 Apr '26

I’ve been struggling with my CompTIA exam prep and honestly, it's been hard to manage everything. The idea of asking someone to take my online CompTIA exam for me https://www.theresearchguardian.com/take-my-comptia-exam-for-me/ seemed a bit extreme at first, but after seeing how many students do it, I’m starting to consider it seriously. If anyone has tried this service, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Was it worth the investment? How reliable were the test takers? I just want to make sure I'm making the right choice.

3 3

Managing Complicated Laws in BSC Implementations
by Fennellmarian018＠gmail.com 09 Apr '26

09 Apr '26

The complexities of Base Station Controller (BSC) integration in open-source mobile networks have presented me with a number of overlapping areas pertaining to telecommunications legislation and regulatory compliance. In order to better comprehend how international legal standards affect open BSC installations in various jurisdictions, this intersection has unanticipatedly prompted me to seek [url=https://dissertationwritinghelp.uk/law-dissertation-help/]law dissertation help[/url]. I would love to hear from anyone else who has studied legal issues in their OpenBSC-related academic or practical work, as well as suggest some books.

5 4

Artvigil Australia: A Trusted Solution for Enhanced Focus and Wakefulness
by csheldon756＠gmail.com 31 Mar '26

31 Mar '26

Artvigil in Australia is a popular nootropic medication known for promoting wakefulness and mental alertness. Containing Armodafinil, it is often prescribed to manage sleep disorders such as narcolepsy, shift work sleep disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea. Many professionals and students also use Artvigil to improve focus, productivity, and cognitive performance. Available through reputable online pharmacies, Artvigil offers a reliable alternative to Modafinil with longer-lasting effects. Australians seeking a safe and effective way to stay alert can buy Artvigil online after consulting a healthcare professional to ensure proper dosage and safe usage- https://www.healthmatter.co/product/artvigil-150/

3 2

Re: AMR on E1 BTS with tw-e1abis-mgw
by Sipos Csaba 30 Mar '26

30 Mar '26

Hi Mychaela, The AMR capability works great with your drop-in MGW implementation, voice quality improved a lot. I also tested the FR/EFR part earlier, which also works as expected. CSD is definitely interesting, once I have at least two CSD capable devices, I will give that a try as well. We already tried with a Nokia MetroSite, and early next year I am planning to try with our UltraSite setup at the museum as well. Would be nice to be able to send fax on top of GSM :-) The OML dialect we have in Osmocom now (called "nokia_site") despite its name it supports old Nokia equipment up to Felxi EDGE, Multiradio and Multiradio10 (on E1), if anyone else is interested, so OML support is not limited to just the Nokia *Site family. Some of this stuff is still running in less fortunate countries... Little bit of tweaking will likely needed, but at least it is not a completely unknown part like AoIP. Regards, Csaba

6 11

SMS: UCS-2 concatenation with UTF16 emoticons
by Keith 26 Mar '26

26 Mar '26

Hi all, I noticed that SMS with emoticons on the boundary of the concatenated segments are not displaying correctly on the destination handset. * - imagine the disaster when that kiss-blowing smiley face thing at the end of your SMS turns out as a diamond with a ? for the recpipient! OMG, the potential butterfly effect is too much to think about... :)) So... This is my analysis: We have 140 bytes for the message, less the 6 bytes for the user header data in the case of concatenated SMS , leaving 134 bytes. It's well know that this means 67 characters per segment for an SMS using UCS-2 encoding. But, it we fill the message with emoticons that are using 4 bytes per 'character', then we have space for 134/4 = 33 and a half. Ooops. Still, the destination handset should reassemble the message and stick the two "halves" of the emoticon together, right? - except I'm not observing this. To rule out us doing something wrong in osmo, I wonder might somebody else (who has an unlimited SMS package) from a commercial provider try sending some crafted SM from one emoji-enabled phone to another, something like this: 😱abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123😱56789 That's likely going to get mangled by mailing list or your mua, so it is: [4 byte emoji]abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123[4 byte emoji]56789 You could also try various messages filled with emojis. Of course, if you bring up your osmo network with SMPP-mirror you can watch the trace in wireshark, you'll see when the last emoji gets chopped in two. You could try the same message on osmo and your commerical network. If it's actually a problem of the phones, you should get [4 byte emoji]abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123[two diamonds with ?]56789 Thanks! Keith.

5 5

How to Play and Experience Heardle: A Musical Challenge
by subtle.carp.skco＠protectsmail.net 25 Mar '26

25 Mar '26

Are you ready to put your music knowledge to the test? If you love games that challenge your memory and quick thinking, you’ll enjoy Heardle. This addictive game invites players to guess a song based on short audio clips, making it a delightful experience for music lovers and casual gamers alike. Either alone or with friends, Heardle can provide a fun and engaging way to connect through music. https://heardlefree.com/ Gameplay The aim of Heardle is simple: guess the song title using limited audio clues. When you begin, the game plays an initial snippet of a song—typically just a few seconds long. From there, players have six attempts to guess the correct title. Each incorrect guess prompts an additional segment of the song to be revealed, gradually giving you a better chance at making your correct guess. To start playing, visit Heardle, where you’ll find a user-friendly interface. Upon loading, you will be greeted with a "Play" button to kick off the challenge. Once you’ve made your guesses, the game provides immediate feedback, telling you whether your guess was correct and, if not, allowing you to try again until you either guess the song or run out of attempts. Heardle has a different song each day, keeping the experience fresh. There’s no way to repeat a level, which means every day offers a new challenge and a new chance to flex those musical muscles. Tips for Playing Know Your Genres: If you have a favorite genre of music, use that to your advantage! Often, the daily song will belong to a familiar genre, so leverage your own taste to narrow down your guesses. Pay Attention to Context: Sometimes the first snippet might give away an artist or specific musical characteristic—like a distinctive guitar riff or vocal style. Listen closely and let those nuances guide your guesses. Use a Process of Elimination: If you’re unsure but have a few songs in mind, start guessing songs you’re relatively sure of. As you hear more of the song, you can refine your guesses based on the additional snippets. Play with Friends: Heardle can be even more fun when played with friends. Compete to see who can guess the song first or who can guess it in the least attempts. This also adds a social aspect to your gameplay, making it a shared challenge. Practice Regularly: Like any skill, getting better at Heardle takes practice. The more you play, the more familiar you become with popular tracks, artists, and styles, enabling you to make quicker guesses down the road. Conclusion Heardle is not just an entertaining game; it’s also a fantastic way to engage with music on a daily basis. Whether you're a casual listener or a seasoned aficionado, the thrill of uncovering a song you love creates an exciting experience each day. With its engaging format and user-friendly interface, Heardle is a must-try for anyone looking to challenge their musical knowledge. So grab your headphones, gather your friends, and see who can guess the daily hit first! Remember to enjoy the process and celebrate those musical memories, one note at a time. Happy playing!

2 1

OsmoTRX+B205mini crashes when having another USB device on a different port
by JPichel 20 Mar '26

20 Mar '26

Hello everyone, I am experiencing problems when trying to run osmotrx with a b205mini and I connect another USB device to a different port on the machine. When I do this, osmotrx crashes instantly. Also, when I have the other device already plugged in when I start osmotrx, it takes ~20 seconds to crash. Sometimes it just crashes without giving a reason, like here: DLGLOBAL NOTICE Setting SCHED_RR priority 18 (cpu_sched_vty.c:471) DLGLOBAL NOTICE Setting SCHED_RR priority 18 (cpu_sched_vty.c:471) DLGLOBAL NOTICE Available via telnet 127.0.0.1 4237 (telnet_interface.c:88) DLCTRL NOTICE CTRL at 127.0.0.1 4236 (control_if.c:1024) [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 11.2.0; Boost_107400; UHD_4.1.0.5-3 DMAIN NOTICE -- Transceiver active with 1 channel(s) (osmo-trx.cpp:621) DLSTATS NOTICE Stats timer expire_count=7: We missed 6 timers (stats.c:169) DLGLOBAL NOTICE Stats timer expire_count=31: We missed 30 timers (rate_ctr.c:350) DTRXCTRL NOTICE Changing TSC from 0 to 7 (Transceiver.cpp:1032) DTRXCTRL NOTICE [chan=0] switching to TRXD version 1 (Transceiver.cpp:1059) DMAIN NOTICE Starting the transceiver (Transceiver.cpp:287) LLDTRXCLK NOTICE Sending CLOCK indications (Transceiver.cpp:1198) UDDEV ERROR No packet received, implementation timed-out (UHDDevice.cpp:782) DDEV FATAL UHD: Receive timed out (UHDDevice.cpp:786) DMAIN FATAL Receive error 0 (radioInterface.cpp:340) DTRXDUL FATAL Something went wrong in thread RxLower, requesting stop (Transceiver.cpp:1359) DMAIN NOTICE Shutting down transceiver... (osmo-trx.cpp:588) DMAIN NOTICE Stopping the transceiver (Transceiver.cpp:345) terminate called without an active exception Aborted And sometimes it reports an USB error and shows the talloc report: DMAIN NOTICE -- Transceiver active with 1 channel(s) (osmo-trx.cpp:621) DLSTATS NOTICE Stats timer expire_count=6: We missed 5 timers (stats.c:169) DLGLOBAL NOTICE Stats timer expire_count=26: We missed 25 timers (rate_ctr.c:350) DTRXCTRL NOTICE Changing TSC from 0 to 7 (Transceiver.cpp:1032) DTRXCTRL NOTICE [chan=0] switching to TRXD version 1 (Transceiver.cpp:1059) DMAIN NOTICE Starting the transceiver (Transceiver.cpp:287) DTRXCLK NOTICE Sending CLOCK indications (Transceiver.cpp:1198) LLUterminate called after throwing an instance of 'uhd::io_error' what(): EnvironmentError: IOError: usb rx6 transfer status: LIBUSB_TRANSFER_OVERFLOW signal 6 received talloc report on 'OsmoTRX' (total 8531 bytes in 29 blocks) rate_ctr.c:233 contains 1160 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c72388720 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:343 contains 8 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723886b0 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:342 contains 40 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c72389540 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:341 contains 32 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723895d0 telnet_connection contains 1 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723893d0 struct sched_vty_opts contains 72 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723489f0 logging contains 6197 bytes in 13 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c5d10 struct trx_ctx contains 1021 bytes in 8 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722a0e80 msgb contains 0 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c3ac0 full talloc report on 'OsmoTRX' (total 8531 bytes in 29 blocks) rate_ctr.c:233 contains 1160 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c72388720 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:343 contains 8 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723886b0 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:342 contains 40 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c72389540 trx_rate_ctr.cpp:341 contains 32 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723895d0 telnet_connection contains 1 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723893d0 struct sched_vty_opts contains 72 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723489f0 logging contains 6197 bytes in 13 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c5d10 vty_logp_doc_str contains 1377 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c7231c040 vty_logp_cmd_str contains 260 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c7231ba00 vty_log_level_doc_str contains 1170 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722ff430 vty_log_level_cmd_str contains 236 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722ff2d0 vty_log_level_doc_str contains 1305 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722fc610 vty_log_level_cmd_str contains 257 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722fc4a0 struct log_target contains 330 bytes in 3 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c7220c550 struct osmo_wqueue contains 96 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x7ff689ff4090 struct log_category contains 74 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c6290 struct log_info contains 1261 bytes in 3 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722ac370 uint8_t contains 37 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c6350 struct log_info_cat contains 1184 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c5d80 struct trx_ctx contains 1021 bytes in 8 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722a0e80 127.0.0.1 contains 10 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c5c20 127.0.0.1 contains 10 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c722c5ba0 struct cmd_element contains 122 bytes in 2 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c72369030 logging level lms (debug|info|notice|error|fatal) contains 50 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c7236c1a0 utils.c:386 contains 405 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c7225e5b0 utils.c:386 contains 65 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) 0x559c723524f0 contains 1 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) msgb contains 0 bytes in 1 blocks (ref 0) On the BTS side I see several messages of missed timers, but this is something I see also when I don't have the USB plugged in: <0006> scheduler_trx.c:489 GSM clock started, waiting for clock indications <0006> scheduler_trx.c:578 GSM clock skew: old fn=0, new fn=2555007 <0006> scheduler_trx.c:428 FN timer expire_count=4: We missed 3 timers <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:428 FN timer expire_count=6: We missed 5 timers <0006> scheduler_trx.c:593 We were 1 FN faster than TRX, compensating <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:593 We were 1 FN faster than TRX, compensating <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 2 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:428 FN timer expire_count=7: We missed 6 timers <0006> scheduler_trx.c:593 We were 1 FN faster than TRX, compensating <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:593 We were 1 FN faster than TRX, compensating <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:428 FN timer expire_count=7: We missed 6 timers <0006> scheduler_trx.c:593 We were 1 FN faster than TRX, compensating <0006> scheduler_trx.c:606 We were 1 FN slower than TRX, compensated <0006> scheduler_trx.c:428 FN timer expire_count=7: We missed 6 timers <0006> scheduler_trx.c:435 No more clock from transceiver Does anyone know if this is a software or hardware problem? I am thinking maybe it is related to the power supply of the USB port, but I have no idea. I really need to have both devices connected at the same time. Any help or suggestion is appreciated, Jonathan

3 3

Need nano3G (S8 - Model 237A)
by Akib Sayyed 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Dear List I am extremely sorry for off the topic question. I am willing to buy nano3G Nodeb. Is anyone in list have spare which can be sold. Please let me know. -- Akib Sayyed Matrix-Shell akibsayyed(a)gmail.com akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com Mob:- +91-966-514-2243 <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

7 8

Front and back sides of an MSC
by Mychaela Falconia 17 Feb '26

17 Feb '26

Hello Osmocom community, I have a question about terminology that is not really specific to Osmocom, but is specific to GSM/3G/etc cellular industry, or whatever is left of it. An MSC in a GSM or 3G or any other circuit-switched cellular network has two sides: one side facing the RAN (A interface in GSM, IuCS in 3G), the other side facing PSTN or ISDN or BICC or SIP-I or whatever the fixed telephone network may be. My question: is there a general industry-wide agreement as to which side should be called the front and which should be called the back? To me it seems intuitive to refer to the A/IuCS side of an MSC as the front and the PSTN/ISDN/BICC/SIP-I side of the same MSC as the back. However, I am just one person, and I have no idea whether or not my view is intuitive to others. And it would even worse if the opposite convention happens to be widely used... Hence I am asking this community, in the hope that someone with more industry experience would know how telco network engineers casually refer to RAN-facing and fixed-network-facing sides of an MSC. For a long time I had the idea of building ThemWi MSC as a modular system (multiple processes talking to each other via sockets) with a stripped-down OsmoMSC derivative as the "central" component, and with a radically different placement of MSC-MGW. However, as I started working on more detailed design, I realized a major flaw in my originally envisioned architecture: my original approach to MSC-MGW would break TFO for AMR, specifically the dialogue between TFO-aware BTS and the TRAU equivalent in the MGW. I am now spinning a new architecture in my head, one which tentatively includes two dissimilar MGWs in the MSC. If my front vs back terminology is valid, then the front MGW (talking to AoIP user plane) would perform speech transcoding but become a transparent pass-through for CSD (basically a software-only, IP-based equivalent of a hardware TCSM colocated at the MSC site), while the back MGW would be a transparent pass-through for speech calls, but turn into a complex IWF for CSD. This tentative architecture exactly matches the placement of speech transcoding and CSD IWF functions in traditional hardware MSCs of TDM-based, before-AoIP world. But I need to know if I should keep these front and back terms, or swap them the other way around. M~

4 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC December 2025