Hey all,
I've got a bit of an interesting use case. I've been working to setup the OpenBSC components in order to simulate stress testing a GSM network. I've been able to get communications across the GSM working properly, with MSs able to place calls. However, part of what I'm trying to do involves routing to a simulated PSTN. I turned to sip-connector and asterisk, but my network immediately stopped working once I told the MSC to use an external MNCC.
The setup involves two separate computers. The first is the BSS, which has a BSC, MGW, virtual BTS, and two MSs running on mobile and virtphy. The second is the NSS, with the MSC/VLR, HLR, MGW, and STP. The GSM is split between the two devices because of the eventual goal to increase the number of BSSs to better simulate a real-world GSM.
This was all working fine, until I modified osmo-msc.cfg to include "mncc external /tmp/msc_mncc". In parallel, I setup osmo-sip-connector and ran it on the NSS through the same "/tmp/msc_mncc" socket, pointing it at Asterisk (also on the NSS). This was all done according to the instructions listed here: https://osmocom.org/projects/osmo-sip-conector/wiki/Howto.
Now whenever I place my calls (which I do through mobile's "call" VTY command on the BSS), the call doesn't connect and simply gets released after 30 seconds. After doing some debugging, I've determined that Asterisk is not receiving anything from the sip-connector. Meanwhile, the sip-connector is being told to delete any connection basically as soon as it's created:
<0001> mncc.c:1005 MNCC rcvd message type: MNCC_SETUP_IND
<0001> mncc.c:566 Created call(5004) with MNCC leg(2147483652) IMSI(001010000000001)
<0001> mncc.c:68 Starting Timer for MNCC_RTP_CREATE
<0001> mncc.c:164 MNCC sent message type: MNCC_RTP_CREATE
<0001> mncc.c:1005 MNCC rcvd message type: MNCC_REL_IND
<0001> mncc.c:636 Rcvd MNCC_REL_IND, Cause: RESOURCE_UNAVAIL
<0001> mncc.c:648 leg(2147483652) was released.
<0002> call.c:90 call(5004) released.
The MSC has the following as part of its output when a call is placed:
...
<0020> osmo_ss7.c:1933 0: asp-OsmoMSC-asp: xua_cli_read_cb(): sctp_recvmsg() returned 48 (flags=0x80)
<0023> m3ua.c:714 0: asp-OsmoMSC-asp: Received M3UA Message (XFER:DATA)
<0023> m3ua.c:543 0: asp-OsmoMSC-asp: m3ua_rx_xfer
<0023> m3ua.c:566 0: asp-OsmoMSC-asp: m3ua_rx_xfer(): M3UA data header: opc=2233=1.23.1 dpc=185=0.23.1
<0020> osmo_ss7_hmrt.c:276 m3ua_hmdc_rx_from_l2(): found dpc=185=0.23.1 as local
<0020> sccp_scrc.c:472 scrc_rx_mtp_xfer_ind_xua: HDR=(CO:CODT,V=0,LEN=0), PART(T=Destination Reference,L=4,D=00000007), PART(T=Segmentation,L=4,D=00000000), PART(T=Data,L=6,D=000422040120)
<0021> sccp_scoc.c:1664 Received CO:CODT for local reference 7
<0021> sccp_scoc.c:1698 SCCP-SCOC(7)[0x555adb5ddf40]{ACTIVE}: Received Event RCOC-DT1.ind
<0021> sccp_user.c:175 Delivering N-DATA.indication to SCCP User 'OsmoMSC-A'
<0011> sccp_ran.c:108 (GERAN-A-7) sccp_ran_sap_up(N-DATA.indication)
<0003> ran_peer.c:591 ran_peer(GERAN-A:RI-SSN_PC:PC-1-23-1:SSN-BSSAP)[0x555adb5b1010]{READY}: Received Event RAN_PEER_EV_MSG_UP_CO
<0007> ran_peer.c:407 msc_i(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5d97e0]{READY}: Received Event MSC_EV_FROM_RAN_UP_L2
<0011> ran_msg_a.c:790 msc_i(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5d97e0]{READY}: RAN decode: BSSMAP: CLEAR REQUEST
<0007> msc_i.c:85 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_FROM_I_PROCESS_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
<000b> msc_a.c:196 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: + msc_a_ran_dec: now used by 2 (cc,msc_a_ran_dec)
<0011> ran_msg_a.c:790 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: RAN decode: BSSMAP: CLEAR REQUEST
<0011> msc_a.c:1612 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: RAN decode: BSSMAP Clear Request
<0007> msc_a.c:1433 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_MO_CLOSE
<0007> msc_a.c:733 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_COMMUNICATING}: State change to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING (X2, 30s)
<0011> msc_a.c:769 msc_a(IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ)[0x555adb5daa50]{MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 2 (cc,msc_a_ran_dec)
<000b> msc_a.c:773 VLR subscr IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 4 (attached,active-conn,CC,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
<000b> vlr.c:309 VLR subscr IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 5 (attached,active-conn,CC,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
<000b> vlr.c:314 VLR subscr IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 4 (attached,active-conn,CC,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
<0001> transaction.c:230 trans(CC:INITIATED IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ callref-0x80000003 tid-8) Freeing transaction
<0005> gsm_04_08_cc.c:237 trans(CC:INITIATED IMSI-001010000000001:MSISDN-1234567891:TMSI-0x9B96EF97:GERAN-A-7:CM_SERVICE_REQ callref-0x80000003 tid-8) tx MNCC_REL_IND
...
Any thoughts as to why this one change to my GSM is suddenly stopping it from functioning properly? Thanks, any help is greatly appreciated!
- James
P.S. I didn't want to include my config files for fear of making this message absurdly long, but let me know if you want to see any and I'll gladly post them.
Hello Osmocom community,
I have previously alluded in other threads here that I am seeking to
interface my Osmocom-based GSM network to USA PSTN. In this post I
shall provide details as to exactly what I am doing and how I go about
it.
I am currently experimenting with using bulkvs.com as my USA PSTN
connectivity provider, chosen on the basis of cost economy: it is
incredibly, mind-boggling cheap - the monthly "keepalive" cost is only
6 cents (yes, *cents*) per rented phone number! With phone numbers
this cheap, I don't have to do any kind of "number economy" options:
no need for "phone number NAT" (a single external phone number where a
PBX answers, requiring callers to then dial an internal extension
number), and no need for a mixed scheme where only one or two test
SIMs get real outside numbers while all others get only fake internal
numbers - instead I can give a real valid NANP phone number to every
test SIM on my test/R&D GSM network. For context, my test GSM network
is envisioned as serving two purposes: one is for development and
testing of GSM handsets - real phone numbers are less important here -
and the other purpose is demonstration to gathered audiences (American
patriots and in-person freedom lovers who aren't afraid of some silly
virus) for "oooh and ahhh" - and for this second purpose, having real
phone numbers for every test phone will be a big boost.
The interface to USA PSTN provided by bulkvs.com and other similar
low-cost services is a SIP trunk, hence what I need to implement is a
form of GSM to SIP gateway. But here is the part where I deviate from
what appears to be the established canon in Osmocom-based community
cellular networks: I don't want to run a heavyweight PBX like Asterisk
or FreeSwitch, instead I want to run only a fairly thin, lightweight
layer of extra sw between my OsmoMSC instance (MNCC interface) and the
public-Internet SIP interface provided by bulkvs, with the needed thin
sw layer put together by me, combining newly written code specific to
my use case with bits of code borrowed from elsewhere.
Here is the code I have written / put together so far:
https://www.freecalypso.org/hg/themwi-system-sw/
The README file at the top level of the code repository explains what
is there and how it works, in basic terms.
One of the major pieces I will need to implement is an RTP bridge MGW
that will transcode between GSM codecs (FR1, EFR, AMR) on the GSM side
and G.711 (PCMU or PCMA) on the PSTN-via-SIP side. PSTN-via-SIP
connectivity providers such as bulkvs don't support any GSM codecs
(not one of them), instead they only support G.711 and G.729. I won't
be doing G.729 in ThemWi (transcoding from one lossy vocoder to another
seems like a terrible idea), hence I will run with G.711 on my
PSTN-over-Internet interface and I will need to implement a transcoder
between GSM codec family and G.711. I reason that what I need to
implement is probably quite similar to the transcoding function in
classic GSM E1 TRAUs, except that in the RTP bridge environment I also
have to deal with the added complexities of packet loss, reordering
and silence suppression, unpleasantries of the packet world that
didn't exist in the olden days of TDM luxury.
I don't know whether or not a transcoding RTP bridge MGW is already
implemented somewhere in the bowels of either Asterisk or FreeSwitch -
the size and complexity of both "major sw" choices is quite intimidating
and off-putting. If someone who happens to know the answer gives me a
pointer, it will certainly be very appreciated, but if not, then some
time later I will undertake the big effort to dig in both projects and
look for this transcoder. If the needed transcoder implementation
already exists somewhere, then I will need to lift it out of whichever
project and integrate it into themwi-system-sw - and if there is no
existing published-source implementation, then I will be the first to
produce one.
M~
