OpenBSC April 2022

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

17 participants
31 discussions

ip.access nano 3G S8 Configuration
by John Thewlis - Meath Broadband 18 Nov '25

18 Nov '25

We are trying to setup this AP as part of the 3.5G Osmocom project. We have the software stack operational and are now preparing the nano for testing. When we try to login via telnet at port 8090 we are getting a constant refusal to connect:- root@osm/openbsc/openbsc/src/ipaccess# telnet 192.168.192.30 8090 Trying 192.168.192.30... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused The device seems to be locked as indicated by the leds on the front panel. We have tried resetting the nano to see if this would help but to no avail. Any ideas as to how to access the device for initial configuration?. Thanks John

4 4

Pysim error: SW match failed
by Martin Nagy 16 Aug '25

16 Aug '25

Hi all, After buying a super Sim Kit (16 in 1) from China, I tried the reader (green PCB inside a blue transparent plastic case with a blue LED) and SIM (identified as a fakesupersim) with pysim tool. However i am getting the following error: /pySim-prog.py -n 26C3 -c 49 -x 262 -y 42 -z 1234 -j 1 -t auto Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel) Autodetected card type fakemagicsim Generated card parameters : > Name : 26C3 > SMSP : e1ffffffffffffffffffffffff058100945555ffffffffffff000000 > ICCID : 8949262427518313026 > MCC/MNC : 262/42 > IMSI : 262422461512085 > Ki : 7b74741a1ee14337ec23f9ab92a13648 > OPC : ccd867d60797d8d45354a51b3ef568ff Programming ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "./pySim-prog.py", line 530, in <module> card.program(cp) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/cards.py", line 231, in program self._scc.update_binary('6f30', hplmn + 'ff' * (tl-3)) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/commands.py", line 53, in update_binary return self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(pdu) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/transport/__init__.py", line 87, in send_apdu_checksw raise RuntimeError("SW match failed ! Expected %s and got %s." % (sw.lower(), rv[1])) RuntimeError: SW match failed ! Expected 9000 and got 9804. I checked mailing lists and haven’t found anybody who had similar problem with pysim. Also I have tried forcing different models of SIM, but nothing is working. Obviously I can remove this check from the script file (__init__.py in /pySim/transport), however somebody had a reason to put such condition there. I would like to ask if it is safe to remove that line of code and the purpose of that line of code. Thanks a lot and best regards Martin

3 3

Re: Help with sccp library
by mosbah abdelkader 08 Jul '25

08 Jul '25

> I don't understand. This callback will be called with data you need to write > to the network. In case of MTP Level3 you will need to wrap that around the > msgb you got. I means: is the interaction with mtp3 layer implemented (is sending sccp data by mtp3 implemented by the library?)? Also, what about the reception of data from mtp3 layer. is that implemented in the sccp lib. I am asking these questions because I see the code of mtp3 in the lib but no significant call is present in the sccp part of the lib. Thank you for your help.

4 3

dynamic traffic channels
by Neels Hofmeyr 20 May '25

20 May '25

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:05:28AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > [translated from german] > is it certain that we switch a channel to PDCH only when > gprs mode != none? A TS can be GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH; those are the only ones for which we send a PDCH ACT message. We send a PDCH ACT message - during init (CHANNEL OML's state changed to enabled -> send PDCH ACT), - and upon channel release ack when pchan == GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH. So the question is, when we receive a channel release ack, could that be the PDCH release and we switch PDCH right back on by accident? No, because we only receive a chan rel ack when the *TCH/F* is being released. That is because the PDCH release is initiated "internally" from the PDCH DEACT, and thus this condition in common/rsl.c rsl_tx_rf_rel_ack() catches on, which existed before dyn PDCH: if (lchan->rel_act_kind != LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL) { LOGP(DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, "%s not sending REL ACK\n", gsm_lchan_name(lchan)); return 0; } In rsl_rx_rf_chan_rel() the rel_act_kind is set to LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL, but not in the rsl_rx_dyn_pdch(). This is analogous to the ip.access way -- the ip.access nanobts replies to a PDCH DEACT with a PDCH DEACT ACK and doesn't send a separate channel release ack. Maybe we could set rel_act_kind to some new LCHAN_REL_ACT_IPAC_DYN_PDCH for clarity? (But we shouldn't actually send a release ack, to stay compatible.) Even though it works as-is, we should indeed add another flag check: - We do check the flags that no ACT/DEACT is already pending; - And we do send a PDCH DEACT only if ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE; - But we would send a PDCH ACT despite ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE. This should never happen, but it would make sense to ensure that. ~Neels

3 5

Problem while running NIB on Open Cellular Base sation
by Brackley Casinga 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

Hi, My name is Brackley Cassinga Form DRC, we run a community network called pamoja net where we offer gsm services using osmocom open source software and OC Base station. Recently I have tried to install another base station as the same installed but I could not find any resource guiding through all the steps to take to run NIB on a base station. I'm currently running Ubuntu and I will appreciate if you could guide me on the installation of BSC,hlr,MSC , in order to run a basic gsm network. Thank you. Regards -- *Ir Brackley heshima Casinga **Pacifique* *CEO and Founder of kwanzatechnologie* KwanzaTechnologies ,GlobalElectronics +243977265291 | +243977265291 | Pcassinga(a)gmail.com/ brackley(a)ensemblepourladifference.org www.kwantechnologies.jimdosite.com <http://www.kwantechnologies.com/> | Skype: Brackley cassinga <https://webapp.wisestamp.com/#> Av Semliki N 43

2 1

sysmo-usim-tool error
by msfu 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

hi there, i have an issue with sysmo-usim-tool. If i do sudo ./sysmo-usim-tool.sjs1.py -a 4051049678932293688 -o my cli returns with sysmoUSIM-SJS1 parameterization tool Copyright (c)2017-2019 Sysmocom s.f.m.c. GmbH Initializing smartcard terminal... Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sysmo-usim-tool.sjs1.py", line 97, in <module> main(sys.argv[1:]) File "./sysmo-usim-tool.sjs1.py", line 94, in main Application(argv, "ucmI:", ["usim", "classic", "mode", "set-iccid="]) File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/common.py", line 125, in __init__ self._init() File "./sysmo-usim-tool.sjs1.py", line 76, in _init self.sim = Sysmo_usim_sjs1() File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/sysmo_usim_sjs1.py", line 240, in __init__ Sysmo_usim.__init__(self, "3B 9F 96 80 1F C7 80 31 A0 73 BE 21 13 67 43 20 07 18 00 00 01 A5") File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/sysmo_usim.py", line 40, in __init__ self.sim = Simcard(GSM_USIM, toBytes(atr)) File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/simcard.py", line 88, in __init__ self.card = USIM(atr) File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/card/USIM.py", line 188, in __init__ ISO7816.__init__(self, atr, CLA=0x00) File "/usr/src/sysmo-usim-tool/card/ICC.py", line 158, in __init__ self.cardservice = cardrequest.waitforcard() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/pyscard-1.9.5-py3.8-linux-aarch64.egg/smartcard/CardRequest.py", line 68, in waitforcard return self.pcsccardrequest.waitforcard() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/pyscard-1.9.5-py3.8-linux-aarch64.egg/smartcard/pcsc/PCSCCardRequest.py", line 208, in waitforcard raise CardRequestTimeoutException() smartcard.Exceptions.CardRequestTimeoutException: Time-out during card request maybe i spelled the adm wrong. but it is calculated from hex 3838383838383838. can you help me? Thanks msfu

4 6

FCSIM1 cards availability and applications
by Mychaela Falconia 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hello Osmocom community, In my previous reply to Anonymous Internet User msfu666, I mentioned that I sometimes give out FCSIM1 cards free of cost to certain recipients, but I did not elaborate on the conditions. I did not spell out the conditions because I hadn't actually given much thought to what they should be - but thinking about it now, I realize that only one condition would actually make sense. My FCSIM1 cards are good for one and only one purpose: operating your own GSM network (presumably with Osmocom CNI software, no idea if OpenBTS/YateBTS would work or not) *for the purpose of* providing service specifically to vintage handsets. Therefore, the condition becomes quite simple: if there is anyone here besides just me who operates their own Osmocom-based GSM network _specifically for the purpose_ of providing service specifically to _vintage_ GSM handsets and you would like some of my FCSIM1 cards, please let me know and I'll send you a few. What are vintage GSM handsets? For the present purpose, we can define a vintage GSM handset as being one that: a) has a 2FF SIM socket, as opposed to 3FF or 4FF or eSIM; b) has a 2G-only radio; c) does not speak UICC/USIM protocol, only GSM 11.11 SIM. If anyone besides me operates their own GSM network specifically for the purpose of providing service to (or just playing with) such vintage handsets, then FCSIM1 cards would be a good choice for such operation: hence if you would like some, you can have them for the cost of shipping. OTOH, if you operate your own network, even if it's a 2G network radio-wise, for some purpose other than exclusively serving or playing with vintage handsets, then my FCSIM1 cards will NOT be a good choice for your applications. Specifically, if you are going to connect any kind of "modern" phones to your network, even if it's 2G RAN, those "modern" phones will want 3FF or 4FF SIMs - but my FCSIM1 cards are 2FF only, and thus a poor choice for such usage. Sincerely, Lady Mychaela Nadezhda Falconia, Mother of FreeCalypso, Dame of the Order of 2G, Champion of Published Source Code

1 0

T200 expiring with nanoBTS, breaking voice calls
by Mychaela Falconia 23 Apr '22

23 Apr '22

Hello Osmocom CNI folks, I got my first GSM network up and running, using nanoBTS hardware and Osmocom CNI sw stack. I compiled everything from source (to my knowledge, no one makes binary packages for Slackware), but rather than grabbing the state of git master on some random day, I checked out tagged versions corresponding to the latest official 2021-11 CNI release. My configuration is 2G-only, CS-only, minimal split-NITB, thus the 5 processes I am running are OsmoSTP, OsmoHLR, OsmoMGW, OsmoMSC and OsmoBSC. I'm using the same OsmoMGW instance for both MSC and BSC. The functional state is: phones with FCSIM1 cards in them whose programming matches the data I entered into HLR are able to connect (location update succeeds), SMS from one phone to another works, and USSD requests *#100# and *#101# also work. However, voice calls don't work. The user-visible symptoms are: 1) When I dial a call from one connected phone to another, the destination phone starts ringing, and it shows the calling number on the display - thus CC signaling works correctly at least in the initial phases. 2) However, a short time (I measured a little under 20 s) after the start of the process, the destination phone stops ringing and shows a missed call indication. However, the origin phone continues playing its NOIBT ringing tone as if it is still waiting for the call to be answered, and it keeps going for another 15-20 s or so, before it gives up. 3) Trying to press the answer button on the destination phone before it stops ringing and goes into the "missed call" state does NOT produce a connected call state either. To see what's going on, I turned on maximum verbosity logging in all OsmoCNI components and plowed through the resulting massive log. (I am logging via syslog - the whole point of running Slackware is principled opposition to systemd.) And I see what appears to be the culprit - see lines 7558 and 7559 in the attached log, UTC timestamp 02:48:54, 11 seconds after I initiated the test call from the origin phone. It appears that the BTS is telling the BSC that this error occurred: "Timer T200 expired (N200+1) times", and based on the lchan(0-0-2-TCH_F-0) annotation, this error is happening on the origin leg of the call, rather than the destination leg. I looked up what T200 is: https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/GSM-timers.html T200: "It is used as retransmission on data link layer. Value varies depending on different messages (for FACCH it is set to 155ms)" Why in the world are FACCH (or is it SACCH?) data link transmissions suddenly failing on the origin leg of the call, some 11 to 13 seconds in? I have tried 4 different phones in the call-origin role (Motorola C139 running its original fw, Pirelli DP-L10 likewise, Nokia C3-00 and my own FreeCalypso fw), and the behaviour is always the same. Has anyone seen this problem before? Is it perhaps a known issue with nanoBTS that requires some special workaround? This tarball: https://www.freecalypso.org/members/falcon/osmo-cni/t200-fail-config+log.ta… contains my configuration files for all 5 OsmoCNI components and an excerpt from syslog. The syslog excerpt begins with all 5 OsmoCNI components booting up, followed by two phones connecting, and finally the test call. I would really appreciate it if someone could give me some pointers for debugging this voice call show-stopper. TIA, Mychaela

3 6

issue with osmo-sim-auth
by msfu 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

hello, i ran into an issue with osmo-sim-auth. if i try ./osmo-sim-auth.py -r 00000000000000000000000000000000 -s it says Traceback (most recent call last): File "./osmo-sim-auth.py", line 27, in <module> from card.USIM import USIM File "/usr/src/osmo-sim-auth/card/USIM.py", line 56 print '[DBG] type definition: %s' % type(self) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax do you know what the problem is? i think i installed pcsc-lite, pcscd and pyscard and dependencies. thank you

5 5

OsmoDevCall on Apr 29, 2022: Osmocom Community TDMoIP (OCTOI)
by Harald Welte 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Dear Osmocom community, It's my pleasure to announce the next OsmoDevCall (delayed by one week from our usual spot) on April 29, 2022 at 20:00 CEST at https://meeting5.franken.de/b/har-xbc-bsx-wvs In this edition, I will be presenting on the state of the OCTOI (Osmocom TDMoIP) Retronetworking activities (see https://osmocom.org/projects/octoi/wiki) This meeting will have the following schedule: 20:00 meet + greet 20:10 presentation as outlined above 21:00 unstructured supplementary social event [*] Attendance is free of charge and open to anyone with an interest in Osmocom or open source cellular technologies. More information about OsmoDevCall, including the schedule for further upcoming events can be found at https://osmocom.org/projects/osmo-dev-con/wiki/OsmoDevCall Looking forward to meeting you soon! Best regards, Harald [*] this is how we started to call the "unstructured" part of osmocom developer conferences in the past, basically where anyone can talk about anything, no formal schedule or structure. -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC April 2022