OpenBSC September 2018

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

20 participants
34 discussions

Re: OsMux + MGW + SIP
by Keith 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

I was browsing a little through the osmux code in openbsc and libosmo-netif, but I did not quite find the answer to this question I have: Pablo maybe you can shed light? When you divide the OSMUX stream again and turn each circuit ID back into individual RTP stream you have an associated port and IP, right? (on the terrestrial side) I'm wondering if we could have: * local bsc and it's colocated mgw * local msc, with two colocated mgws (we decide which one to signal depending on if the call is local or needs the SAT stream) another point here is I undertand we don't _really_ need two MGWs, so maybe just one in the village, shared between bsc/msc and one in the datacentre. so in the case of a call that is using sat/ osmux, the MSC in the village is signalling the MGW in the datacentre, therefore this MSC knows which IP/port combination to tell to osmo-sip-connector and on to freeswitch, which then signals whatever SIP UA in the data centre So, the fact that osmux is used at all is completely transparent to the SIP UAs Does that make sense? k/

2 2

Call Detail Log - OSMO Elements
by Ron 07 Sep '18

07 Sep '18

Hi Community, Is there a documentation regarding the Call Detail Logs in any of the OSMO Elements such as Call Information (call started, duration and end/caller and callee information,etc...) and SMS Information (sent/received time/sender and receiver,etc...)? And may we know what log level configuration do we need to configure for us to see those information? Thanks in advance. Best Regard, Ron Menez ron.menez(a)entropysolution.com<mailto:ron.menez@entropysolution.com>

4 6

Fwd: Multi-Tenancy / Multi-Operator Support
by Shingirai Simba 06 Sep '18

06 Sep '18

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:30 PM Subject: Re: Multi-Tenancy / Multi-Operator Support To: Shingirai Simba <shingy92(a)gmail.com> Hi! I would appreciate if you could send your response to the mailing list, so I can further follow-up to it. This way, our conversation is to the benefit of the wider Osmocom community. Regards, Harald On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:57:48AM +0200, Shingirai Simba wrote: > Hie Harald > > Indeed i am referring to 3GPP MOCN / GWCN as per TS 23.251, but any viable > work around is most welcomed even if it does not met specifications. I am > contemplating the idea of just running this kind of configuration as 3 > different LXD instances, but will i able to share the same physical SDR > radio instance with the 3 separate core networks.' > > Regards > > Shingirai A. Simba > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:54 AM Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote: > > > Hi Shingirai Simba, > > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:15:26PM +0200, Shingirai Simba wrote: > > > We are contemplating on a Multi-Operator / shared radio for 3 communitiy > > > operators in Zimbabwe, Africa. > > > > The question is: How exactly does the above high-level goal translate into > > concrete technical architecture? Would the goal be to run your complete > > own > > PLMN with the other operators just roaming into that network (i.e. using > > TCAP/MAP > > roaming interface), or are you referring to a 3GPP MOCN / GWCN as per TS > > 23.251? > > > > Or something else entirely? > > > > > Does OsmoBSC/OsmoMSC n support this using SDR front ends. > > > > In either of the two cases, the current implementation doesn't provide > > everything > > you'd need for such a setup. But let's continue this discussion once it's > > more > > clear what kind of technical architecture you're looking for. > > > > -- > > - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> > > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > > > > ============================================================================ > > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. > > A6) > > -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 1

Multi-Tenancy / Multi-Operator Support
by Shingirai Simba 06 Sep '18

06 Sep '18

Hie We are contemplating on a Multi-Operator / shared radio for 3 communitiy operators in Zimbabwe, Africa. Does OsmoBSC/OsmoMSC n support this using SDR front ends. Regards Shingirai Simba

2 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC September 2018