10 Jun
2009
10 Jun
'09
8:34 p.m.
Hi Holger!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
some of us started to look into the various 08.0x
specs and even SCCP (not me
yet) and I think our common goal is to go towards a more "normal" BSS/MSC and
in the same way keeping the spirit of bsc_hack to allow to run a whole network
with one executable.
exactly.
To keep this short ('m quite tired at the moment)
my goal/approach is to
create a libmsc.a and move the db.c, gsm_subscriber.c and on the way to move
policy out of gsm_04_08.c to the libmsc.a. bsc and msc would communicate with
an API that resembles the DTAP, BSSMAP interface. The MNCC use case Andreas
and Harald are working on should remain supported, same as the bsc_hack.c.
yes. Basically the split you are introducing is below the MNCC and the
bsc_hack application cases. They both use [parts of] MSC and BSC functionality,
i.e. can be implemented on top of the libmsc + libbsc combination that you're
aiming for.
I will start this work in a branch called holger/msc
and will seek for
feedback once I have something that is worthwhile to share.
great. good luck!
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)