21 Nov
2015
21 Nov
'15
8:32 p.m.
On 21 Nov 2015, at 19:18, Harald Welte
<laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
But in any case, your mail was not a response to my
question. What do
you think about it?
Was there another question than if we object? I do not object and I think using
the system talloc is the right thing to do. I was surprised that the Fedora package
didn't raise this issue.
I think we
should remove <osmocom/core/talloc.h> at the same time.
I think we should keep it as a convenience wrapper just containing a
single line of "#include <talloc.h>". _maybe_ with a #warning together.
This makes sense for people wanting to build e.g. older branches with
new libosmocore. That wrapper-header doesn't hurt and helps people
avoid broken builds.