28 Mar
2011
28 Mar
'11
5:28 p.m.
Hi Pablo,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
those are good news.
BTW, do you plan to maintain a stable ABI along releases for libraries?
that's the idea once we have the namespace pollution fixed and release a 1.0
Let me know if you are OK with this approach and
I'll send a
patchset along this week.
I think it's great. Once the namespace is cleaned up, I think we can head
for a 1.0 release of the libraries. Another proposition: it may be a good idea to use some
EXPORT_SYMBOL()
macro, similar to what we use in the Linux kernel, to explicit tell what
symbols of the library are exported.
I think it makes sense, indeed. Feel free to work on a patch, after
the namespace conversion has been done. Also, don't forget the wireshark
dissector related work (which I think is more important).
Thanks,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)