OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

8 participants
4276 discussions

SNMP interface for OpenBSC
by Daniel Willmann 30 May '10

30 May '10

Hello, OnWaves would like to get/set the status from OpenBSC via SNMP. I would like to kick off the discussion about how we can best achieve that while keeping everyone happy. :-) There are two possibilities that have been discussed so far: * Implement a subagent in OpenBSC. With this method OpenBSC would directly connect to snmpd through the agentx protocol. * Write a proxy that relays the snmp requests to OpenBSC. The proxy would have to implement the snmp interface and talk to OpenBSC through some protocol. There are upsides and downsides with both approaches. One arguably doesn't want to have the net-snmp library linked to OpenBSC (though I'm not sure what the exact reasons are, I just heard it from different people). On the other hand designing a new protocol to speak between proxy and OpenBSC poses problems of its own. Furthermore, if you write the proxy in C you'll be using net-snmp anyway. You could use python to implement the proxy, but my local python expert tells me that the python snmp library is far from nice to use. Please share your thoughts, ideas, etc. Regards, Daniel Willmann

2 1

BS-11 TRX0 software load errors
by Harald Welte 28 May '10

28 May '10

Hi, I have two BS-11 here, which both show the same strange problem: PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: No Load Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: Load BTSCAC MBCCU1: No Load Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: Load BTSCAC MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSDRX Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSBBX Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSARC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load Abis-link: Down I.e. MBCCU0 aborts the software load process during BTSCAC phase, while MBCCU1 continues like usual. Has anybody else seen this yet? I've already re-installed the firmware without any success. If they are really broken, has anyone yet tried to switch some of the internal components? A BTS that only has TRX0 is still useful.. but one without TRX0 but TRX1 is pretty useless :/ Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 2

AW: AW: (problems compiling openbsc)
by Andreas.Eversberg 28 May '10

28 May '10

hi holger, it worked. thanx for your help. but now i got stuck here: ./configure in openbsc: checking for LIBOSMOCORE... configure: error: Package requirements (libosmocore >= 0.1.6) were not met: No package 'libosmocore' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBOSMOCORE_CFLAGS and LIBOSMOCORE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. "pkg-config --list-all" does not show libosmocore. my directory: "dir /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/" shows libosmocore.pc and spandsp.pc, nothing else. it seems that my version of pkg-config stores it somewhere else. my version is 0.23. with that it works, but it should be easier, i think: LIBOSMOCORE_LIBS=/usr/local/lib/ LIBOSMOCORE_CFLAGS=-I../libosmocore/include/ LIBOSMOVTY_LIBS=/usr/local/lib/ LIBOSMOVTY_CFLAGS=-I../libosmocore/include/ ./configure now i get these errors when compiling openbsc: gsm_04_11.c:343:16: error: invalid suffix "b111" on integer constant ... the source sais "switch (fi & 0b111) {". i never saw binary values in C. (gcc version 4.1.2) andreas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org [mailto:openbsc-bounces@lists.gnumonks.org] Im Auftrag von Holger Hans Peter Freyther Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010 16:06 An: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org Betreff: Re: AW: (problems compiling openbsc) On 05/25/2010 09:49 PM, Andreas.Eversberg wrote: > rm libtool > autoreconf -f --install ?

2 1

linking problems
by Andreas.Eversberg 28 May '10

28 May '10

hi again, here is the current compiler output. compile works, but linking fails: gcc -Wall -I../../libosmocore/include/ -I../../libosmocore/include/ -g -O2 ../../libosmocore/src/.libs/libosmocore.a -o bsc_hack bsc_hack.o bsc_init.o bsc_vty.o vty_interface_layer3.o libmsc.a libbsc.a libvty.a libmsc.a -ldl -ldbi ../../libosmocore/src/vty/.libs/libosmovty.a -lcrypt bsc_hack.o: In function `main': /files/projects/isdn/openbsc/openbsc/src/bsc_hack.c:215: undefined reference to `log_init' /files/projects/isdn/openbsc/openbsc/src/bsc_hack.c:216: undefined reference to `talloc_named_const' /files/projects/isdn/openbsc/openbsc/src/bsc_hack.c:221: undefined reference to `log_target_create_stderr' /files/projects/isdn/openbsc/openbsc/src/bsc_hack.c:222: undefined reference to `log_add_target' /files/projects/isdn/openbsc/openbsc/src/bsc_hack.c:229: undefined reference to `log_set_all_filter' ... libosmocore.a has a reference to 'log_init', but the linker will not find it somehow. any idea? andreas

2 1

AW: (problems compiling openbsc)
by Andreas.Eversberg 26 May '10

26 May '10

>> hi, >> >> while trying to bring latest api of openbsc and linux-call-router >> together, i experienced the following problem: > >make a clean rebuild... your libtool seems hosed. this does not work: rm libtool autoreconf -f make and i have the non-working libtool again.

2 1

(no subject)
by Andreas.Eversberg 25 May '10

25 May '10

hi, while trying to bring latest api of openbsc and linux-call-router together, i experienced the following problem: make[2]: Entering directory `/files/projects/isdn/openbsc/libosmocore/src' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -MT timer.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/timer.Tpo -c -o timer.lo timer.c ../libtool: line 775: X--tag=CC: command not found ../libtool: line 808: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ../libtool: line 775: X--mode=compile: command not found ../libtool: line 925: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ../libtool: line 926: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: Xgcc: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-DHAVE_CONFIG_H: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-I.: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-I..: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-I../include: No such file or directory ../libtool: line 1069: X-fPIC: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-Wall: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-g: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-O2: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-MT: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: Xtimer.lo: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-MD: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-MP: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X-MF: command not found ../libtool: line 1069: X.deps/timer.Tpo: No such file or directory ../libtool: line 1069: X-c: command not found ../libtool: line 1120: Xtimer.lo: command not found ../libtool: line 1125: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `': command not found make[2]: *** [timer.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/files/projects/isdn/openbsc/libosmocore/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/files/projects/isdn/openbsc/libosmocore' make: *** [all] Error 2 andreas

2 1

New OpenGGSN project mailing list / 0.90 release
by Harald Welte 25 May '10

25 May '10

Hi! This is just a notification that I've now created a mailing list related to OpenGGSN development. As the entire OpenGGSN project is running on sf.net, the mailinglist is also running there: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ggsn-devel So if you're interested in following what's happening in OpenGGSN, I suggest you subscribe there, too. I understand it would probably make more sense to simply move the entire project to osmocom.org and use this very openbsc list (it is low-traffic, after all) - but we never know if the original author wants to come back, and I'd be able to keep that door open for him and thus the project separate and on sf.net. I've also made a openggsn-0.90 release including various bugfixes that were contributed trough the last 5 years, as well as one criticial security fix. You can obtain it from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ggsn/ Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

problems running osmo_sgsn
by ken 25 May '10

25 May '10

Hi, I have git clone the openbsc program and encountered problem running osmo_sgsn, got the following error messages: " There is no such command. Error occurred during reading below line: nsip local port 23000 Failed to parse the config file: 'osmo-sgsn.cfg' <0014> sgsn_main.c : 170 Cannot parse config file. " Appreciate help on this. Thanks Ken

3 2

[sourceforge] #11031: Abandoned Project Takeover: OpenGGSN (ggsn)]
by Harald Welte 22 May '10

22 May '10

Hi all, as you can see from the attachment, the OpenGGSN takeover request at soruceforge has been resolved earlier than expected, since the original project creator/administrator was not reachable for sf.net. I'll keep you posetd about the further progress. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

Re: RFC: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3
by Dieter Spaar 20 May '10

20 May '10

Hello Harald, On Wed, 19 May 2010 21:28:10 +0200, "Harald Welte" <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote: > > So let's start with a poll: > > a) Do you think re-licensing to AGPLv3 is a good idea? I don't have much experience in this area (different GPL versions), but for me it sounds OK. > b) If you have contributed, would you re-license your code under AGPLv3? There is probably not that much from me, but feel free to put the affected parts under AGPLv3. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC