From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org>
Hi!
The following patchset contains one fix and two improvements.
You can find them in the pablo/updates branch.
Please, merge it!
Pablo Neira Ayuso (3):
msc: bail out if subscriber VTY command fails
abis: skip e1_input nesting if empty
bsc: on-demand setup of nanoBTS and HSL femto sockets
openbsc/src/libabis/e1_input_vty.c | 8 ++++++--
openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_init.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c | 11 ++++++++++-
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
1.7.2.3
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)gnumonks.org>
Hi!
This patchset updates the logging framework, it contains one fix and
several updates/improvements.
You can find it in pablo/logging branch.
Please, merge it!
Pablo Neira Ayuso (5):
logging: fix missing description of global loglevel
logging: several memory allocation belong to tall_log_ctx context
logging: rework _output() function
logging: remove workaround now that _output() has been reworked
logging: make sure the output is null-terminated
src/logging.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
1.2.3.4
Hi Pablo!
I've recently received a bug report that somehow the config-file-stored
configuration of which log levels/subsystems to enable on stderr don't work.
This may be related to the legacy "-d DINP:DNM:... style log level
specifications, e.g. we first read the config file and then set some default
logging options usign the legacy version.
Maybe you can find some time to investigate and fix the issue.
Thanks in advance,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi!
I'm experiencing problems with pysim-prog. Using the example available
in the README file.
# ./pySim-prog.py -n 26C3 -c 49 -x 262 -y 42 -z lila -j 0
Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel)
I get stuck here forever. The same message shows if I remove the
supersim card from the reader.
Running pysim inside strace shows:
write(1, "Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel)\n", 38) = 38
ioctl(3, TIOCMBIS, [TIOCM_RTS]) = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000}) = 0 (Timeout)
ioctl(3, TCFLSH, 0) = 0
ioctl(3, TIOCMBIC, [TIOCM_RTS]) = 0
select(4, [3], [], [], {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 500000}) = 0 (Timeout)
ioctl(3, TIOCMBIS, [TIOCM_RTS]) = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000}) = 0 (Timeout)
ioctl(3, TCFLSH, 0) = 0
ioctl(3, TIOCMBIC, [TIOCM_RTS]) = 0
... [and so on]
The pl2303 module is loaded correctly, and I have used it before to
access some embedded devices via serial line:
pl2303 2-2:1.0: pl2303 converter detected
usb 2-2: pl2303 converter now attached to ttyUSB0
usb 2-2: USB disconnect, device number 11
pl2303 ttyUSB0: pl2303 converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0
Any clue on what's wrong?
Thanks!
Hi "Mr. Unknown",
it has come to my attention that you are running a copy of our OpenBSC
website (http://openbsc.osmocom.org/) at http://openbsc.microembedded.com/
We appreciate your enthusiasm for OpenBSC and like to thank you for
your work on the Chinese translation.
However, it would have been good to coordinate about this with us. Making
a copy of the website as a sub-domain to your company "MicroEmbedded" may
seem to some people as if you were representing the OpenBSC project (which
you are not), or that OpenBSC is somehow a work of your MicroEmbedded company.
After some checking, it seems that the final line on each page "注: BscHack (英文原文出 处,以上翻译整理仅供 OpenBSC 爱好者参考! email: support(a)microembedded.com )"
provides a link to the orignal page at bs11-abis.gnumonks.org.
Once again in this link you provide your e-mail address, followed by the
company footer of your web-page.
The contents of the OpenBSC website has copyright, and we do not think it is
appropriate for you to associate your company in this way with OpenBSC. You
are not a member of the project, you have not contributed to the OpenBSC
software, and you have not contacted us about obtainign permission to make
such a translated copy.
Furthermore, there are several problems with your website:
1) it is out of date, as you have used a very old version of the OpenBSC
website to translate. As a result, quite some of your links back to
the original OpenBSC site are broken.
2) You have introduced capitalization changes like "$ Sqlite" which will not
work, as the command is "$ sqlite"
If your intentions in running a translated OpenBSC site are honest, I would
like to invite you to do so in working together with us. We can provide
you with the respective space on the official homepage, and you can contribute
your translated content there.
In return, we may put a "thank you" link to microembedded.com in the Thanks
section at http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki#Thanks
We hope this is acceptable to you. In any case, we hope you can understand
that we will not tolerate you putting your company name next to a copy of the
OpenBSC wiki.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Dear List,
I'm a long time listener, first time caller - but have been enjoying
experimenting with OpenBSC for a little while now.
I've come across a new (to me) nanoBTS with some strange behavior: it seems
to come up normally and pull an IP over DHCP, and interacts as expected with
the ipaccess-find and ipaccess-config tools, but *never* attempts to
establish an OML link.
After provisioning the correct settings with ipaccess-config, the unit
reboots and slow-flashes the orange light (no OML) and there is *no* network
traffic initiated by the nanoBTS past the DHCP exchange; however, I can ping
the unit using ipaccess-find and ping.
After running a reset with the dongle and a repeat of the above, I get the
same results.
Any ideas?
Thank You,
-MM
Hello all,
I want a confirmation.
I 've seen in openBSC features that openBSC handles handover between cells
inside one BSC. So I think it's possible to connect several nanoBTS to
openBSC and move from one cell to another without losing the outgoing call.
Am I right ?
Thank you.
Chris
All -
I am looking for a full-card SIM programmer to use with pySim and GR-Card SIMs. By full-card I mean it accepts a full-size smart-card with the SIM still attached. I have tried the Bludrive II unit provided by GR-Card under both Mac OS X and Ubuntu with no luck. (And yes, I tried downloading and installing the drivers.) Can anyone recommend something that is known to work with pySim under Linux or OS X? Or is there some other driver that I need to install or configure?
-- David