Hello everybody.
I was successful in running the calypso BTS by using the openBTS (without
gprs).
Now I am trying to setup a GPRS N/w with the guide provided at
http://wush.net/trac/rangepublic/wiki/GPRS and by using the same Calypso
BTS. Want to know whether if this can work out. If not I want to do some
minimal implementation (GPRS attach or just activate a PDP context).
I followed the tutorial and I am here with logs from PCU and SGSN.
LOG from Osmo-PCU
# ./osmo-pcu -n 06 -m 234
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:375 BTS available
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:91 Sending activate request: trx=0 ts=6
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:502 PDCH: trx=0 ts=6
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:91 Sending activate request: trx=0 ts=7
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:502 PDCH: trx=0 ts=7
<0009> gprs_bssgp_pcu.cpp:508 NS-VC 4 is unblocked.
<0008> gprs_bssgp_pcu.cpp:549 Sending reset on BVCI 0
<0008> gprs_bssgp_pcu.cpp:557 Sending reset on BVCI 7
<0008> gprs_bssgp_pcu.cpp:565 Sending unblock on BVCI 7
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:296 RACH request received: sapi=1 qta=1, ra=120,
fn=961674
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:1901 Got IMM.ASS confirm, but rest octets
do not start with bit sequence 'HH01' (Packet Downlink
Assignment)
0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:564 TBF T3169 timeout during transsmission
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:82 - Assignment was on CCCH
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:88 - No uplink data received yet
<0001> pcu_l1_if.cpp:296 RACH request received: sapi=1 qta=1, ra=124,
fn=963005
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:1901 Got IMM.ASS confirm, but rest octets
do not start with bit sequence 'HH01' (Packet
DownlinkAssignment)
0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:564 TBF T3169 timeout during transsmission
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:82 - Assignment was on CCCH
<0002> gprs_rlcmac_data.cpp:88 - No uplink data received yet
After a successful GSM attach procedure the phone is accessing the BTS on
RACH for a GPRS attach.
This set of statements repeats as long as the phone trying to do a GPRS
attach send requests on RACH. It seems like the phone BTS receives RACH and
a channel is assigned (IMM ASS, I can see this TBF assignment in
Wireshark), but I doubt whether this IMM ASS has reached the phone that is
trying to GPRS attach.
Log from SGSN
#./osmo-sgsn
<0010> gprs_ns.c:171 NSVCI=65534 Creating NS-VC
<0010> gprs_ns.c:171 NSVCI=65535 Creating NS-VC
<0010> gprs_ns.c:806 Creating NS-VC for BSS at 192.168.111.144:5948
<0010> gprs_ns.c:679 NSEI=65535 Rx NS RESET (NSVCI=0, cause=O&M
intervention)
<0010> gprs_ns.c:538 NSEI=8 Tx NS RESET ACK (NSVCI=4)
<0010> gprs_ns.c:679 NSEI=4 Rx NS RESET (NSVCI=8, cause=PDU not compatible
with protocol state)
<0010> gprs_ns.c:538 NSEI=8 Tx NS RESET ACK (NSVCI=4)
<0010> gprs_ns.c:865 NSEI=8 Rx NS UNBLOCK
<0010> gprs_ns.c:865 NSEI=8 Rx NS UNBLOCK
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:249 BSSGP BVCI=0 Rx RESET cause=O&M intervention
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:249 BSSGP BVCI=7 Rx RESET cause=O&M intervention
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:272 Cell 234-6-1000-0 CI 0 on BVCI 7
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:344 BSSGP BVCI=7 Rx BVC-UNBLOCK
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:747 BSSGP BVCI=7 Rx Flow Control BVC
<0011> gprs_bssgp.c:747 BSSGP BVCI=7 Rx Flow Control BVC
and The last statement repeats.........
the statement
Cell 234-6-1000-0 CI 0 on BVCI 7
The RAI and Cell ID are 0 and 0.... But when I read the code gprs_bssgp.c
it says these parameters will be received from BSS. If I set these
parameters in OpenBTS.db similar to LAC=RAC but still there is no effect.
I am running ./ggsn, ./osmo-sgsn, ./osmo-pcu, ./openbts
Is osmo-nitb needed along with SGSN and PCU.
I fail to do GPRS attcach in this situation. Can someone please give your
comments and guide me with some suggestions.
regards,
Altaf
Hi,
automake 1.13 appeared on my system lately.
As with every version bump of auto* some directives are no more 'en vogue'.
This time it's INCLUDES in Makefile.am files. AM_CPPFLAGS should be used now,
INCLUDES will be removed in some future release.
I created trivial patches for the osmo projects using autotools of which I
already had clones.
These are:
libosmo-abis
libosmocore
libosmo-dsp
libosmo-sccp
openbsc
osmo-bts
osmocom-bb
osmo-gmr
The patches are for the master branch of the respective repository,
current HEAD.
I'll send the patches individually.
Feel free to apply the patches if they seem useful.
Otherwise, feedback is appreciated.
Kind regards,
-Alexander Huemer
