osmocom-sdr

osmocom-sdr@lists.osmocom.org

904 discussions

OpenSourceDABplusSDRreceiver
by mrzfrn 26 Apr '13

26 Apr '13

"However, nobody has implemented a full and open DAB+ SDR receiver yet" Not true, look at http://www.sdr-j.tk/index.html Francesco

3 4

[PATCH 1/1] add -S (synchronous) mode to rtl_fm
by Stuart Henderson 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

The enclosed diff adds a synchronous mode to rtl_fm. This helps OpenBSD (where libusb async isn't yet working). Signed-off-by: Stuart Henderson <stu(a)spacehopper.org> --- src/rtl_fm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rtl_fm.c b/src/rtl_fm.c index e8ebb77..a71e287 100644 --- a/src/rtl_fm.c +++ b/src/rtl_fm.c @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ void usage(void) "\t[-E sets lower edge tuning (default: center)]\n" "\t[-N enables NBFM mode (default: on)]\n" "\t[-W enables WBFM mode (default: off)]\n" + "\t[-S force sync output (default: async)]\n" "\t (-N -s 170k -o 4 -A fast -r 32k -l 0 -D)\n" "\tfilename (a '-' dumps samples to stdout)\n" "\t (omitting the filename also uses stdout)\n\n" @@ -723,12 +724,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) uint32_t dev_index = 0; int device_count; int ppm_error = 0; + int sync_mode = 0; char vendor[256], product[256], serial[256]; + fm_init(&fm); pthread_mutex_init(&data_ready, NULL); pthread_mutex_init(&data_write, NULL); - while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "d:f:g:s:b:l:o:t:r:p:EFA:NWMULRDC")) != -1) { + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "d:f:g:s:b:l:o:t:r:p:EFA:NWMULRDSC")) != -1) { switch (opt) { case 'd': dev_index = atoi(optarg); @@ -815,6 +818,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) case 'R': fm.mode_demod = &raw_demod; break; + case 'S': + sync_mode = 1; + break; default: usage(); break; @@ -921,9 +927,24 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Failed to reset buffers.\n");} pthread_create(&demod_thread, NULL, demod_thread_fn, (void *)(&fm)); - rtlsdr_read_async(dev, rtlsdr_callback, (void *)(&fm), - DEFAULT_ASYNC_BUF_NUMBER, - lcm_post[fm.post_downsample] * DEFAULT_BUF_LENGTH); + if (sync_mode) { + fprintf(stderr, "Reading samples in sync mode...\n"); + while (!do_exit) { + r = rtlsdr_read_sync(dev, &fm.buf, + lcm_post[fm.post_downsample] * DEFAULT_BUF_LENGTH, + &fm.buf_len); + if (r < 0) { + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: sync read failed.\n"); + break; + } + full_demod(&fm); + } + } else { + fprintf(stderr, "Reading samples in async mode...\n"); + rtlsdr_read_async(dev, rtlsdr_callback, (void *)(&fm), + DEFAULT_ASYNC_BUF_NUMBER, + lcm_post[fm.post_downsample] * DEFAULT_BUF_LENGTH); + } if (do_exit) { fprintf(stderr, "\nUser cancel, exiting...\n");} -- 1.8.1.3

3 3

rtl_test patch
by Nuno Gonçalves 21 Apr '13

21 Apr '13

Corrects bugs where: Cumulative PPM error is always "342" if execution stopped before first PPM_DURATION. PPM error alias to wrong values if over +-1045 (this happens quite a lot actually due to bug reported at [1]). Behavior changes: Cumulative PPM error value is now printed every PPM_DURATION so the user can check when it is settled. [1] http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/2013-April/000584.html Thanks, Nuno Signed-off-by: Nuno Goncalves <nunojpg(a)gmail.com> diff --git a/src/rtl_test.c b/src/rtl_test.c index f5a56b8..c705e04 100644 --- a/src/rtl_test.c +++ b/src/rtl_test.c @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static int ppm_benchmark = 0; static int64_t ppm_count = 0L; static int64_t ppm_total = 0L; +static uint32_t samp_rate = DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE; + #ifndef _WIN32 static struct timespec ppm_start; static struct timespec ppm_recent; @@ -108,6 +110,7 @@ static void rtlsdr_callback(unsigned char *buf, uint32_t len, void *ctx) { uint32_t i, lost = 0; int64_t ns; + int real_rate; if (uninit) { bcnt = buf[0]; @@ -141,17 +144,23 @@ static void rtlsdr_callback(unsigned char *buf, uint32_t len, void *ctx) if (ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec > PPM_DURATION) { ns = 1000000000L * (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec); ns += (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_nsec - ppm_recent.tv_nsec); - printf("real sample rate: %i\n", + printf("real sample rate: %i", (int)((1000000000L * ppm_count / 2L) / ns)); - #ifndef __APPLE__ - clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ppm_recent); - #else - gettimeofday(&tv, NULL); - ppm_recent.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec; - ppm_recent.tv_nsec = tv.tv_usec*1000; - #endif + ppm_total += ppm_count / 2L; ppm_count = 0L; + + #ifndef _WIN32 + ns = 1000000000L * (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_start.tv_sec); + ns += (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_nsec - ppm_start.tv_nsec); + real_rate = (int)(ppm_total * 1000000000L / ns); + printf(" cumulative PPM error: %.1f\n", + (1000000.0 * (real_rate - (int)samp_rate)) / samp_rate); + #else + printf("\n"); + #endif + + ppm_recent = ppm_now; } #endif } @@ -213,13 +222,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) int sync_mode = 0; uint8_t *buffer; uint32_t dev_index = 0; - uint32_t samp_rate = DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE; uint32_t out_block_size = DEFAULT_BUF_LENGTH; int device_count; int count; int gains[100]; - int real_rate; - int64_t ns; while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "d:s:b:tpS::")) != -1) { switch (opt) { @@ -365,15 +371,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (do_exit) { fprintf(stderr, "\nUser cancel, exiting...\n"); - if (ppm_benchmark) { -#ifndef _WIN32 - ns = 1000000000L * (int64_t)(ppm_recent.tv_sec - ppm_start.tv_sec); - ns += (int64_t)(ppm_recent.tv_nsec - ppm_start.tv_nsec); - real_rate = (int)(ppm_total * 1000000000L / ns); - printf("Cumulative PPM error: %i\n", - (int)round((double)(1000000 * (real_rate - (int)samp_rate)) / (double)samp_rate)); -#endif - } } else fprintf(stderr, "\nLibrary error %d, exiting...\n", r);

1 0

rtlsdr not reseting buffers
by Nuno Gonçalves 21 Apr '13

21 Apr '13

rtlsdr in async mode is returning buffers full with data from previous calls. I noticed that sometimes the first async callbacks would return TOO QUICKLY so that it would be impossible to have sampled that data. This might be because lib-usb have previous transfers submitted and not cleared? I compiled rtl_test with a small modification that will print the sampling time if it is much lower than expected. BUF_LENGTH is (16 * 16384)=256K, and SAMPLE_RATE is 2048000, so a full buffer should take about 64ms. You can see that in this example the async callback is returned after 7.79ms (and the following one 1.47ms later). So the data must be old. The ns printf nuno@ubuntu:~/Desktop/rtl-sdr/build/src$ ./rtl_test -p Found 1 device(s): 0: ezcap USB 2.0 DVB-T/DAB/FM dongle Using device 0: ezcap USB 2.0 DVB-T/DAB/FM dongle Found Rafael Micro R820T tuner Supported gain values (29): 0.0 0.9 1.4 2.7 3.7 7.7 8.7 12.5 14.4 15.7 16.6 19.7 20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4 37.2 38.6 40.2 42.1 43.4 43.9 44.5 48.0 49.6 Reporting PPM error measurement every 10 seconds... Press ^C after a few minutes. Reading samples in async mode... ERROR ns: 7791886 ERROR ns: 9259301 lost at least 185 bytes real sample rate: 2073369 real sample rate: 2048190 ^CSignal caught, exiting! User cancel, exiting... Cumulative PPM error: -289 The modifications to demonstrate the issue: nuno@ubuntu:~/Desktop/rtl-sdr/src$ git diff diff --git a/src/rtl_test.c b/src/rtl_test.c index f5a56b8..1935bfb 100644 --- a/src/rtl_test.c +++ b/src/rtl_test.c @@ -138,9 +138,11 @@ static void rtlsdr_callback(unsigned char *buf, uint32_t le ppm_now.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec; ppm_now.tv_nsec = tv.tv_usec*1000; #endif - if (ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec > PPM_DURATION) { - ns = 1000000000L * (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec) - ns += (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_nsec - ppm_recent.tv_nsec); + ns = 1000000000L * (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec); + ns += (int64_t)(ppm_now.tv_nsec - ppm_recent.tv_nsec); + if(ns<60000000) + printf("ERROR ns: %9lld\n",ns); + if (ppm_now.tv_sec - ppm_recent.tv_sec > PPM_DURATION) { printf("real sample rate: %i\n", (int)((1000000000L * ppm_count / 2L) / ns)); #ifndef __APPLE__ Nuno

1 0

Can't get below -46 dB
by Luca Bedogni 17 Apr '13

17 Apr '13

Hi I have an Elonics 4000 USB receiver, and I-m trying to do some measurements on the digital television received power in my area. Everything works fine, except that the received power is never lower than -46 dB, even on channel which are not occupied. I was expecting to get values like -120 dB or something similar, instead in my measurements the lowest point in any portion of the spectrum is circa -46 dB. Am I missing something? Thank you Best

3 3

DAB+ free/open encoder: fdk-aac-dabplus
by Benjamin Hagemann 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

Hello, I read on twitter: Opendigitalradio.org @opendigiradio "A new DAB+ free/open encoder is born ! https://github.com/piratfm/fdk-aac-dabplus …" https://twitter.com/opendigiradio/status/324231787163303936 -- Regards, Benny gpg 0xFC505AB0 jabber benny(a)benny.de sip benny(a)benny.de

4 3

Using the R820T above 1.77 GHz?
by Per Baekgaard 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

One more (but completely different) topic, hence a separate mail: Has anyone experimented with using the R820T above 1.77 GHz?

2 4

ask help for the format of outcome IQ data
by kainwen 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

Hello, I use rtl_sdr to collect some data into a bin file(file.bin). As from the wiki, I think it is parsed like this : /fd = open("file.bin","r") ;// // char I[];// // char Q[];// ////loop :// // read(fd, I, 1) ;// // read(fd, Q,1) ;// // endloop// // char *p = Q ;// // loop :// // printf("%f\n", (float*)p);// // p += 4 ;// ////endloop/ But this code can only print 0.00000 I don't know where the error is. Please help me. Thank you.

1 0

Thank you
by Marco Haakmeester 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

Hi, I believe through this mailaddress I can reach the persons that have written the excellent wiki on the installation of the realtek receiver for it to receive ADS-B signals. I am a vivid Linux 'customer' but not a programmer. Yet, using the instructions I have been able to get a signal on my pc. So thanks for a well written wiki! Best regards, Marco Ps: the most difficult issue to tackle was to find an address for this 'thank you' note ;-)

1 0

R820T "spur prevention" code
by Per Baekgaard 15 Apr '13

15 Apr '13

List, As a new member here, only recently having acquired a few SDR units, I am not sure if this is the right place to post the following. If not, feel free to advice me of a better way (for reference, I've tried to mail a few of the key people here already directly, but I guess that was not the correct way to approach it). R820T tuning problems ============== As far as I can tell, the "correct" way to tune a RTL SDR device is to call rtlsdr_set_center_freq, which in turn invokes the set_freq function of the driver (mapped to r820t_set_freq which further calls r820t_SetRfFreqHz in case of the R820T). This may not always result in the desired frequency being tuned to. In some cases, such as with the current tuner_r820t.c driver, it can lead to rather large "errors" *). For instance, trying to tune to 144.000 MHz works as intended -- but tuning to anything in the range 144.002 to 144.058 will lead to center frequency of 144.030 MHz, or in other words an error as large of 28 kHz. [If you apply a PPM value other than 0, the exact range will be a little different.] I've also seen cases where use of the "kalibrate" program to locate GSM channels has resulted in one actual GSM channel being detected on 3 adjacent channels, 2 of which are incorrect -- and the calculated frequency deviation is also often wrong on some channels. For GSM channels and other frequencies above 885 MHz, the tuning "error" can be as much +/- ~225 kHz. Now, the way for an application to verify the resulting tuning would be to call the rtlsdr_get_center_freq. However, in the current implementation, this will return the requested tuning (adjusted with any calculated offsets set in the librtlsdr.c driver -- which is not applicable for the R820T) and not the actual tuning. Further, I've checked a couple of GUI programs on how they use the rtl library. One (linrad) only calls the rtlsdr_set_center_freq function and newer checks the resulting tuning. Another (gqrx via the osmo library) does a similar thing, but has a note "FIXME: Read back frequency?" comment. Also, the kalibrate suite does not check for the actual tuned frequency either. So all of these applications will report an incorrect frequency of the spectrum, and the error depends on what center frequency you may have requested. So -- unless I have overlooked something, which could be entirely possible -- the current R820T driver sometimes detunes the requested center frequency and the applications using it are not checking for this. And if they had wanted to do so, they have no means to with the current codebase. Proposed "fix" ======== I understand the R820T driver is messy anyway and that its origin has caused it to be what it is. The problem above is caused by a few lines of code in tuner_r820t.c around line 1460, that does "spur prevention". The idea is that if the resulting VCO frequency is too close to a harmonics of the xtal/2 frequency, the VCO is detuned to run exactly on top of the harmonics, to reduce any spurs within a (450/N) kHz bandwith, where N is the MixDiv, i.e. the divisor used to derive the center frequency from the VCO that runs between 1.77 and 3.54 GHz. This probably makes a lot of sense for applications where the exact tuning is not too important. Likely when using the stick for DVB-T as originally intended, the later stages will compensate for the detuning and just benefit from the reduced amount of spurs. But for our use, it might make less sense and I guess most of the other drivers have not implemented something like this anyway? I can think of the following ways to fix this issue: 1) Disable the code that does the detuning (either temporarily (#if 0/#endif) or by some setup parameter so that an application can specifically ask for the "detune" behaviour). This will possibly introduce additional spur on the R820T, in the presence of strong "near-center frequency" signals, but will fix the problem for existing SDR applications. In case of an optional "setup" parameter, proper handling of the detuning and reporting back to the calling application has to be made available, and those applications then eventually need to implement some way of handling it. 2) Merge with the possibly somewhat similar "offset" tuning method implemented for some other devices -- although I'm not sure exactly how that is intended to work and if it truly is compatible with the R820T method. 3) Keep the code as is, but "tweak" the sampling in the 2832 device to compensate for the offset tuning. So in other words, instead of assuming the nominal IF of 3.57 MHz, tune to an offset IF. This will obviously skew the BW and may not work for smaller sampling rates, where the offset could actually be larger than what the sampling rate allows... I would propose to simply disable the code for now (and I'm happy to submit a small patch), as the detuning currently appears to introduce more problems than it solves. A 2nd step would then be to add a proper report-back abstraction/functionality to all drivers and make the librtlsdr.c code fully aware of the detuning and allow it to be reported back to the caller, and then ask the application developers to start using the get_center_freq calls -- at least if they have asked for "enable_spur_prevention" or something similar. Thanks for any comments/advice on the above, -- Per.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
...
91
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

osmocom-sdr