20 Feb
2012
20 Feb
'12
8:53 p.m.
Hello David,
I could also give a more detailed presentation on the
radiomodem and
FEC parts of OpenBTS if there is interest in such low-layer details,
maybe on Monday afternoon if there are still people around.
I am interested too, however I have to leave on Monday afternoon. But
if I am the only one affected there is of course no need to change the
schedule.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de
21 Feb
21 Feb
9:03 a.m.
New subject: OsmoDevCon: Radiomodem / FEC
Hi Dieter and others,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:53:47PM +0000, Dieter Spaar wrote:
Well, I see the following options:
Option 0) if there is consensus to move some other topic to monday afternoon
in order to free some slot for the radiomodem/TRX, I am happy to alter
the schedule.
Option 1) Also, we could make some other slot smaller. But at least I'm
feeling a bit difficult to do so without any input from you.
We might reduce UMTS and Smalltalk projects to one hour each, freeing
one hour for radiomodem+FEC on Sunday. We might also do the same with
Core network protocols + implementation, but they're really quite
complex and I was hoping to get more people involved in them...
Option 2) We simply do it at one of the nights after dinner
Option 3) We convince David to have his lunch a bit later while we
all enjoy eating Pizza + listening to his talk during the lunch break.
Ok, that would be unfair, wouldn't it? ;)
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
I could also
give a more detailed presentation on the radiomodem and
FEC parts of OpenBTS if there is interest in such low-layer details,
maybe on Monday afternoon if there are still people around.
I am interested too, however I have to leave on Monday afternoon. But
if I am the only one affected there is of course no need to change the
schedule. 
9:54 a.m.
New subject: OsmoDevCon: Radiomodem / FEC
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:03, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
Hi Dieter and others,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:53:47PM +0000, Dieter Spaar wrote:
Well, I see the following options:
Option 0) if there is consensus to move some other topic to monday afternoon
in order to free some slot for the radiomodem/TRX, I am happy to alter
the schedule.
Option 1) Also, we could make some other slot smaller. But at least I'm
feeling a bit difficult to do so without any input from you.
We might reduce UMTS and Smalltalk projects to one hour each, freeing
one hour for radiomodem+FEC on Sunday. We might also do the same with
Core network protocols + implementation, but they're really quite
complex and I was hoping to get more people involved in them...
I would be happy to reduce my UmTRX talk from 1h to 20-30min if this
helps. I don't think there will be a lot to tell or discuss about
UmTRX. The only thing which may cause a discussion is the way of
open-sourcing hardware. I would love to get feedback on this from
everyone, but I'm not sure whether audience will be interested in this
topic or not.
Then, I think we could shrink GPRS from 2h to 1.5h and have a followup
discussion at free time if needed. I'm not sure how many people will
be really interested in 2h long discussion on a very specific topic.
Well, unless you plan to do a long intro on GPRS architecture.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
I could
also give a more detailed presentation on the radiomodem and
FEC parts of OpenBTS if there is interest in such low-layer details,
maybe on Monday afternoon if there are still people around.
I am interested too, however I have to leave on Monday afternoon. But
if I am the only one affected there is of course no need to change the
schedule. 
5:18 p.m.
New subject: OsmoDevCon: Radiomodem / FEC
Harald -
I don't mind option 3 as long as there is something left for me to eat. I made the
suggestion late, so I can be flexible. I don't think there is more than an hour of
material. Option 2, after dinner, is OK also.
-- David
On Feb 21, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Harald Welte wrote:
Option 3) We convince David to have his lunch a bit later while we
all enjoy eating Pizza + listening to his talk during the lunch break.
Ok, that would be unfair, wouldn't it? ;)
26 Feb
26 Feb
11:43 a.m.
New subject: OsmoDevCon updated schedule (was Re: OsmoDevCon: Radiomodem / FEC)
Hi Alexander and others,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
I would be happy to reduce my UmTRX talk from 1h to
20-30min if this
helps. I don't think there will be a lot to tell or discuss about
UmTRX. The only thing which may cause a discussion is the way of
open-sourcing hardware. I would love to get feedback on this from
everyone, but I'm not sure whether audience will be interested in this
topic or not.
Ok, noted. I also agree it might probably not require a full hour.
Thus, I have made it to 30 mins and added the osmo-codegen topic into
the remaining 30mins.
Then, I think we could shrink GPRS from 2h to 1.5h and
have a followup
discussion at free time if needed. I'm not sure how many people will
be really interested in 2h long discussion on a very specific topic.
Well, unless you plan to do a long intro on GPRS architecture.
I've removed osmo-codegen from the list of topics and reduced it to one
hour in order to make space for David. Hope this is ok...
Regarding the GPRS topics: I think it would help to have some technical
information on what kind of tasks the PCU all needs to implement, as I
guess not everyone is very familiar with it.
The updated schedule is now on the official OsmoDevCon2012 page:
https://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OsmoDevCon2012#Schedule
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
4463
days inactive
4464
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexander Chemeris -
David A. Burgess -
Dieter Spaar -
Harald Welte