Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Osmocom

Max, you fixed the coverity issue in https://gerrit.osmocom.org/2885, but a few lines above that, there is another +1 that seems one +1 too many: if (m_id_len > MAX_BTS_FEATURES/8 + 1) { LOGP(DNM, LOGL_NOTICE, "BTS%u Get Attributes Response: feature vector is truncated to %u bytes\n", bts->nr, MAX_BTS_FEATURES/8); m_id_len = MAX_BTS_FEATURES/8; } I can't claim I understand why this size check is necessary on top of the other one, but certainly "> MAX_BTS_FEATURES/8 + 1" doesn't match setting "m_id_len = MAX_BTS_FEATURES/8". ~N