Hi Max,
regarding the original patch:
* the commit message fails to explain why this fixes a segfault,
and when that segfault occurs
* if Neels provides some feedback like the one he did, please follow-up
to that to keep progress on this patch going.
If the OSMO_ASSERT() in the original code was wrong, then please explain
why it was wrong. This explanation belongs in the commit log message.
Also, as trx_lc15l1_hdl() can now return NULL, did you verify that all
callers of that function can actually deal with a NULL return value?
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)