20 Mar
2014
20 Mar
'14
10:24 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 03:14:21PM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
I added C99 initializers to the test (see the patch
attached or
achemeris/sms-fixes branch) and to me it looks less readable and thus
more error prone. If you see any benefits of this patch - feel free to
merge it, though.
Can you squash the two patches and fix the typo in the subject line?
The benefit of C99 is being a bit more robust against changes in the
struct.