6 Dec
2012
6 Dec
'12
8:37 a.m.
Harald Welte <laforge <at> gnumonks.org> writes:
Responding to the only question that zecke did not respond to:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:07:28PM +0300, jason mercury wrote:
I would like to ask you about the "quick fix" you mention when there is text in
the extension field. Does this fix affect the gsm_subscriber or the gsm_sms
structure? Is it something that affects only a few files
or it is necessary to make major modifications?
3) Could I send SMS in which extension of the
sender is text not integer.
no, this doesn't work with the current architecture. We also don't want
to work on a quick fix but rather "outsource" the full SMS processing into
a separate process. For that we need a clean API/interface/protocol how
the MSC-part of bsc_hack and that external process interact, and that again
will probably be based on our TCAP/MAP implementation, which is under active
development.