1 Feb
2015
1 Feb
'15
11:39 a.m.
Dear Holger,
Here it is.
Patch description:
This patch adds the ability to change the RESET_TIMER parameter. This change affects the
Nokia Site family only, and it is important for multi-BTS setups. (eg. multiple InSite
units daisychained and UltraSite). The parameter can be set in the config file with the
following syntax: nokia_site bts-reset-timer <15-100>. The default value is 15
seconds.
Tested with InSite, MetroSite and UltraSite units.
Thanks!
Csaba
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Sipos Csaba wrote:
Dear Holger,
Hi,
sorry for the delay. Please send this patch to the ML. I do not
have Nokia BTSes andcan't test your patch.
1 Feb
1 Feb
2:56 p.m.
New subject: Patch for OpenBSC [Nokia Site family]
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:39:53AM +0100, Sipos Csaba wrote:
Dear Holger,
thank you!
+ "nokia_site bts-reset-timer
<15-100>",
+ bts->nokia.bts_reset_timer_cnf = atoi(argv[0]);
without using this new command the default will change from 15 to 0
seconds? Shouldn't you initialize bts_reset_timer_cnf with 15 somewhere?
And what is the reason to make this variable a bitfield? is it transported
on the wire like this?
10:19 p.m.
New subject: Patch for OpenBSC [Nokia Site family]
Hi Holger,
Sorry for that, clearly there are some mistakes in the patch, will try and fix it.
Thnaks for the feedback!
Regards,
Csaba
----- Eredeti üzenet -----
Feladó: "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" <holger(a)freyther.de>
Címzett: "Sipos Csaba" <sipos.csaba(a)kvk.uni-obuda.hu>
Másolatot kap: openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org
Elküldött üzenetek: Vasárnap, 2015. Február. 1. 14:56:59
Tárgy: Re: Patch for OpenBSC [Nokia Site family]
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:39:53AM +0100, Sipos Csaba wrote:
Dear Holger,
thank you!
+ "nokia_site bts-reset-timer
<15-100>",
+ bts->nokia.bts_reset_timer_cnf = atoi(argv[0]);
without using this new command the default will change from 15 to 0
seconds? Shouldn't you initialize bts_reset_timer_cnf with 15 somewhere?
And what is the reason to make this variable a bitfield? is it transported
on the wire like this?
3384
days inactive
3384
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Holger Hans Peter Freyther -
Sipos Csaba