baseband-devel May 2017

baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org

17 participants
31 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Engagetted !
by Sébastien Lorquet 14 Oct '25

14 Oct '25

http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/29/researchers-eavesdrop-on-encrypted-gsm-c… Congrats!

7 7

Calypso BTS
by phreaker1983 16 Nov '19

16 Nov '19

I tried to install CalypsoBTS have libosmocore installed, osmo-bts osmobsc, libosmo-netif, libosmo-abis, ortp, trx, libosmo-dsp everything went without errors, following the instructions I created: touch ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg , then when you run : osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg-l ~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3-P-C --debug=DRLL:CC:MM:RR:RSL:NM shows me:<0005> bsc_init.c:498 Failed to parse the config file: '/root/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg' file tried to create as administrator but without success , pleas help me -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Calypso-BTS-tp4026753.html Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

6 13

OpenBTS OsmocomBB Asterisk
by trixbox.t 14 Jul '18

14 Jul '18

Hello! I Need Help I install these three programs OpenBTS, OsmocomBB, Asterisk Then run them, Everything works well OpenBTS sent an SMS to my phones I answered and he checked me I registered into OpenBTS a second phone I tried to transfer SMS between phones - all good but when I try to call from one to another I did not get Asterisk writes ================================================================ *CLI> Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 755803415(a)127.0.0.1 for seqno 179 (Critical Response) -- See wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/SIP+Retransmissions Packet timed out after 32001ms with no response ================================================================ Why? What do I do? -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/OpenBTS-OsmocomBB-Asterisk-tp402… Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

6 14

Re: Phone not receiving calls
by Vadim Yanitskiy 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

Hi, Don't get me wrong, but your current description sounds like "I have a problem, but I wouldn't say any details about that". Please provide at least mobile application logs, and also try to figure out some things yourself: 1) What is difference between both SIM cards you use? 2) Does mobile with "non-working" SIM perform successful LU? 3) Does mobile with "non-working" SIM receive any Paging Request? 4) Does one answer to Paging Request by sending Paging Response? 5) Then, does the L1 switch to a dedicated channel? 6) What is happening on a dedicated channel? 7) ... ? OsmocomBB is not for end users, so you should do / learn a lot of things yourself. After all, the source code is always available. With best regards, Vadim Yanitskiy.

5 14

Creating GSM Users Association (GSMUA)
by Mychaela Falconia 06 Jul '17

06 Jul '17

Hello FreeCalypso and Osmocom communities, I am in the process of creating an informal organisation representing the interests of those members of the GSM universe whose interests are not represented by GSMA etc, and I am inviting you to join me in this venture. I propose that we name our informal organisation GSMUA, standing for GSM Users Association, and my vision for this GSMUA is to be a counter-body (antibody?) to the official GSMA. I just registered the gsmua.org domain name, but there is no website or mailing list set up yet. If someone from the Osmocom camp would like to host the server infrastructure for gsmua.org, I will happily point the DNS to you, otherwise the FreeCalypso family can host it on our server. My vision for GSMUA is to represent the interests of GSM end users (empowered end users who wish to fully own and control all aspects of their user equipment while operating on public mobile networks in a fully spec-compliant manner), small boutique manufacturers of GSM devices (both MS/user equipment and network infrastructure), small community network operators and others whose interests are not represented by GSMA etc, especially in cases where our interests are in direct conflict with the interests of big players such as giant device manufacturers, giant commercial network operators and governments. A key goal of GSMUA is to be project-neutral, that is, every person and every small company belonging to any of the categories listed above (empowered end user, small boutique device manufacturer, small community network operator etc) should be fully welcome regardless of which specific project they are associated with. As of today there are at least two different projects offering GSM MS implementations (OsmocomBB and FreeCalypso) and at least two different projects offering network-side GSM implementations (Osmocom and OpenBTS), and I hope that this number of available alternatives will continue to grow: freedom of choice is always a good thing. But at the present time there exists no neutral soil on which members of different projects with a common interest (GSM networks and devices serving the interests of end users rather than big corporations and governments) and a common enemy (just named) can meet, and this lack of neutral meeting ground is the problem which GSMUA is meant to solve. I also have one practical application for GSMUA in mind already: to manage and legitimize recycling of wasted IMEI number ranges. By the official rules of GSMA etc each different *type* of GSM mobile equipment requires a different TAC, i.e., a range of at least 1 million IMEI numbers. So if a small boutique GSM device manufacturer makes a boutique MS device of which no more than 100 units will ever be made, 999900 IMEI numbers have to be wasted by the official rules. While I don't know of any manufacturer who got a range of 1 million IMEIs and only made 100 devices, we do have examples like Openmoko GTA01/02 and Pirelli DP-L10. In the case of Openmoko GTA02 I've been told that about 15 thousand units were made in total; in the case of Pirelli DP-L10 it appears that the total number produced was somewhere under 100 thousand. In each case a full range of 1 million IMEIs was allocated, and at least 900 thousand numbers out of each range are currently unused and wasted. If a small boutique manufacturer wishes to offer a boutique GSM MS product to the general public and wishes to ship each unit with a world-unique IMEI that stands a good chance of being accepted as valid by common GSM networks, and the product in question does not qualify for IMEI allocation by the official rules (e.g., the product is a development board specifically intended for users to run their own firmware and connect to live public networks with it, taking full personal responsibility for their actions) - the situation I found myself in with my GSM MS development board - I feel that the small boutique manuf in question should be empowered to squat on a small subrange of someone else's IMEI range if it is known beyond reasonable doubt to be wasted and unused. However, this recycling of wasted IMEI number ranges could be better organized and given at least some aura of semi-legitimacy if there were a community body set up to manage it, and this is where my proposed GSMUA can come in. Once we get our GSMUA up and running and assign a group of volunteers to be IMEI recycling managers, any small GSM or 3G+ device manufacturer who needs a small range of IMEI numbers will be able to request one from GSMUA, and we will allocate and assign these small subranges out of whatever wasted range we decide to squat on, ensuring that each requestor gets a different subrange. So these are my ideas, and I would like to see them turn into reality. We are going to need a simple website and a community mailing list at gsmua.org, and for the IMEI recycling service we will need a small group of volunteers to serve as its managers - I and Das Signal from FreeCalypso will be happy to serve on that panel, but it would be nice to also have someone from the Osmocom camp for better neutrality. Bright Blessings, Mychaela Falconia, Mother of FreeCalypso

5 8

Osmocombb with USRP
by Snehasish Kar 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

Hi I needed some information from you, I want to implement a GSM Mobile stack with USRP as RF Frontend. Is it possible to build the DSP part of osmocommbb in a different TI DSP board other than calypso. As it is very difficult to find calypso phones now a days. BR Snehasish

3 4

Osmocombb as a Zombie
by Duarte 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

Hey guys, first of all I want to express my deep respect for this project, this is truly amazing project and very well developed. Second, I'm doing a few studies regarding GSM security (no, I'm not hacking.) and I need to develop a feature for osmocombb, which is: the ability to turn the L23 app as a zombie (C unix domain socket) waiting for instructions (e.g.: connect to the network with predefined parameters (IMSI), collect RAND, send sms,...). Is there any documentation or flow regarding the code? It's very hard for a non C coder to follow the flow... Or is there someone that can help me in the Architectural level? Thank you.

3 2

Osmocombb with USRP
by Snehasish Kar 31 May '17

31 May '17

Hi Herald I needed some information from you, I want to implement a GSM Mobile stack with USRP as RF Frontend. Is it possible to build the DSP part of osmocommbb in a different TI DSP board other than calypso. As it is very difficult to find calypso phones now a days. BR Snehasish

1 0

Re: OsmocomBB compile testing / Re: libosmocore embedded build
by Craig Comstock 29 May '17

29 May '17

I was thinking about how to setup an automated real device test for the repo and/or PRs especially. I have devices and cables, just was thinking about how to automate the re-loading of firmware (via an interface to the power button I suppose). Any work ongoing on this front? I'd be happy to contribute as I have a server I'm going to use for nano3g, calypsobts, development. -Craig -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 5/18/17, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote: Subject: OsmocomBB compile testing / Re: libosmocore embedded build To: "André Boddenberg" <dr.blobb(a)gmail.com> Cc: baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org, "OpenBSC" <openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org>, "Vadim Yanitskiy" <axilirator(a)gmail.com> Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017, 1:24 PM Hi Andre and others. We currently have a series of patches from Vadim pending in gerrit for OsmocomBB. They cannot move ahead, as we have no compile testing / jenkins job which would give this a +1. To resolve this, we should also start to have a jenkins compile testing job for OsmocomBB. The "host" (PC) part of the code is built against regular libosmocore, just like e.g. openbsc or osmo-bts. That should be possible even so far, and it might make sense to start with that. Basically you need to: * git clone osmocom-bb * cd src/host/layer23 * regular 'autoreconf -fi && ./configure && make' compile-testing the 'embedded' (firmware) part is not possible easily in the current master. However, as a second step, and after the libosmocore embedded build has run (and it is installed to /usr/local/arm-none-eabi), and if you use the laforge/remove-libosmocore branch in OsmocomBB, you should also be able to compile-test the firmware using * git clone osmocom-bb * cd src/target/firmware && make There currently is no "make check" tests for either the host utilities or the firmware, and of course we have no clue if the resulting binaries will do anything useful on an actual pone [yet!], but I still think the two steps above would be very useful to move ahead, and to unify the patch submission/review/verification/approval/merge process in gerrit with what we have established for the network-side projects like OsmoBTS & co. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 2

OsmocomBB build verification
by Harald Welte 27 May '17

27 May '17

Hi Vadim, see attachment. This was my 'test ballon': We now have automatic jenkins build verification at least for the host part of OsmocomBB. Please re-push your patch series again into jenkins, so they will get build-verified. -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

baseband-devel May 2017