Dear all, I vae the C115 with a T1 USB to Serial cable with the Prolific
chipset.
When i run osmocon i get :- an its just sits there with no further
processing.
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123xor
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin
read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin):
file_size=17120, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=17127
read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin):
file_size=17120, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=17127
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 2f 00 /.
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 3 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 02 00 ...
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6c l
Received FTMTOOL from phone, ramloader has aborted
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 65 e
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
I think the cable is ok as when i run my fingers on the tip i get random
Zeros so it appears to be talking to the cable.
Also when i tried to run Mobile i get the :- even though i created the
Mobile.cfg file in /etc/osmoco
Failed to parse the config file: '/home/raz/.osmocom/bb/mobile.cfg'
Please check or create config file using: 'touch
/home/raz/.osmocom/bb/mobile.cfg'
I have spent some hours researching the lists and trying various things to
no avail but I want to continue until I resolve this issues and use this
great stack to learn about the GSM network.
Please advise.
Great full for any help or pointers but this maybe a timing issue that is
difficult to debug.
Thanks
Raz
hi,
i did a lot of resarch and testing on cell selection and re-selection
process the last two week.
the cell selection process, network selection process (manual and
automatic) and mobility management process were already implemented in
OsmocomBB a long time, but turned out to be buggy and incomplete. i made
test drives to check the process and debugged it.
the re-selection process is new. it is used to track surrounding cells
while listening to the BCCH of the current cell (camping on a cell).
special extension to the layer1 firmare is used to measure neighbour
cells. if an neighbour cell becomes 'better', the mobile switches to
that cell, depening on different criteria. now it is possible to move
with OsmocomBB.
the re-selection process is not handover! handover is a process where a
phone switches between cells while doing a call. handover is one next
step to implement. the process is a little more complex, because it
requires not only neighbour cell measurements, but also syncing to them
without interrupting the traffic channel. most layer 3 stuff of handover
is already implemented.
if you like to play and test your moving OsmocomBB, you can check out
the "jolly/roaming" branch. it contains the extension to layer1, as well
as sim reader and fixes from "sylvain/testing" branch. use both "mobile"
and "layer1" firmware from this branch.
in order to see some process at VTY, you can do:
enable
monitor network 1 (continously display the strongest cell and neighbour
cells)
show ms 1 (to see current states)
show neighbour-cells 1 (to see a more detailed current list of
neighbours)
andreas
Hi,
in the osmocom bb mobile.cfg I don't see any posibility to set a fixed
Kc encryption key and the tmsi.
How could I achieve that osmocom uses my defined Kc and tmsi?
cheers,
Simian
Hi,
I'm trying to run the latest osmocom-bb git on a Motorola C118 phone.
After a minor problem with the build (as you may've noticed in the
patch I've sent). I got to the point of successfuly running layer1 on
the phone and the mobile app on the PC (I have also enabled TX). The
process seems to be stuck on trying to perform a location update. The
status of the ms is always either:
show ms
MS '1' is up, MM connection active
IMEI: 000000000000000
IMEISV: 0000000000000000
IMEI generation: fixed
automatic network selection state: A1 trying RPLMN
MCC=104 MNC=002 (104, 002)
cell selection state: connected mode 1
ARFCN=19 MCC=104 MNC=002 LAC=0xb00f CELLID=0x4fd9
(104, 002)
radio ressource layer state: connection pending
mobility management layer state: wait for RR connection (location updating)
OsmocomBB>
or
show ms
MS '1' is up, service is limited (pending)
IMEI: 000000000000000
IMEISV: 0000000000000000
IMEI generation: fixed
automatic network selection state: A1 trying RPLMN
MCC=104 MNC=002 (104, 002)
cell selection state: C3 camped normally
ARFCN=19 MCC=104 MNC=002 LAC=0xb00f CELLID=0x4fd9
(104, 002)
radio ressource layer state: idle
mobility management layer state: MM idle, attempting to update
OsmocomBB>
I think, that because of this I can't make any calls or send sms (all
the requests are being rejected):
OsmocomBB# call 1 <X>
call 1 <X>
OsmocomBB#
% (MS 1)
% Call has been rejected
The log information from mobile when it's trying to do a location
update is show below:
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2174 PAGING REQUEST 1
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2141 IMSI 260021964220249 (not for us)
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2132 TMSI fd82a501 (not for us)
<000e> gsm48_mm.c:344 Location update retry
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:345 timer T3211 (loc. upd. retry delay) has fired
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:4311 (ms 1) Received 'MM_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T3211' event
in state MM IDLE, attempting to update
<000e> gsm48_mm.c:2199 Perform location update (MCC 104, MNC 002 LAC 0xb00f)
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2333 LOCATION UPDATING REQUEST
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2355 using LAI (mcc 104 mnc 002 lac 0xb00f)
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2363 using TMSI 0x28a3d62e
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:914 new state MM IDLE, attempting to update -> wait
for RR connection (location updating)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:5428 (ms 1) Message 'RR_EST_REQ' received in state
idle (sapi 0)
<000e> gsm48_rr.c:1318 Establish radio link due to mobility management request
<0003> gsm322.c:4037 (ms 1) Event 'EVENT_LEAVE_IDLE' for Cell
selection in state 'C3 camped normally'
<0003> gsm322.c:823 new state 'C3 camped normally' -> 'connected mode 1'
<0003> gsm322.c:3653 Going to camping (normal) ARFCN 19.
<0003> gsm322.c:463 Sync to ARFCN=19 rxlev=-74 (Sysinfo, ccch mode NON-COMB)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:366 new state idle -> connection pending
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1465 CHANNEL REQUEST: 00 (Location Update with NECI)
<0003> gsm322.c:2938 Channel synched. (ARFCN=19, snr=16, BSIC=17)
<0001> gsm322.c:2959 using DSC of 90
<0003> gsm48_rr.c:4816 Channel provides data.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 5)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1658 RANDOM ACCESS (Tx-integer 50 combined no
S(lots) 0 ra 0x0e)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1697 Use MS-TXPWR-MAX-CCH power value 5 (33 dBm)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 4)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1658 RANDOM ACCESS (Tx-integer 50 combined no
S(lots) 55 ra 0x07)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1697 Use MS-TXPWR-MAX-CCH power value 5 (33 dBm)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x75 chan_nr 0x0a MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 2 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x75 chan_nr 0x0a MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 2 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 0 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 3)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1658 RANDOM ACCESS (Tx-integer 50 combined no
S(lots) 55 ra 0x0f)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1697 Use MS-TXPWR-MAX-CCH power value 5 (33 dBm)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 2)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1658 RANDOM ACCESS (Tx-integer 50 combined no
S(lots) 55 ra 0x01)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1697 Use MS-TXPWR-MAX-CCH power value 5 (33 dBm)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 1/553m ra 0x18 chan_nr 0x59 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 3 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 1/553m ra 0x18 chan_nr 0x59 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 3 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1658 RANDOM ACCESS (Tx-integer 50 combined no
S(lots) 55 ra 0x0a)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1697 Use MS-TXPWR-MAX-CCH power value 5 (33 dBm)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 1 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1601 RANDOM ACCESS (requests left 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:1605 Done with sending RANDOM ACCESS bursts
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:836 starting T3126 with 5.000 seconds
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2225 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 0 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x0a chan_nr 0x41 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 0 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2393 request 0a matches but not frame number
(IMM.ASS fn=22,6,30 != RACH fn=22,5,25)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x05 chan_nr 0x49 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 1 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x05 chan_nr 0x49 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 1 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2225 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-77 snr= 0 ber= 6 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x00 chan_nr 0x61 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 4 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2473 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x00 chan_nr 0x61 ARFCN 19 TS 1
SS 4 TSC 1)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x7d chan_nr 0x0b MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 3 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x7d chan_nr 0x0b MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 3 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 0 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2225 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2225 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 3 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x77 chan_nr 0x09 MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 1 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 2/1107m ra 0x77 chan_nr 0x09 MAIO 0 HSN 38
TS 1 SS 0 TSC 0)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2503 Request, but not for us.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2225 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2170 PAGING ignored, we are not camping.
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:673 MON: f=19 lev=-78 snr= 0 ber= 6 LAI=104 002 b00f ID=4fd9
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:765 timer T3126 has fired
<000e> gsm48_rr.c:770 Requesting channel failed
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:366 new state connection pending -> idle
<0003> gsm322.c:4037 (ms 1) Event 'EVENT_RET_IDLE' for Cell selection
in state 'connected mode 1'
<0003> gsm322.c:3565 Selecting ARFCN 19. after LOC.UPD.
<0003> gsm322.c:463 Sync to ARFCN=19 rxlev=-74 (Sysinfo, ccch mode NON-COMB)
<0003> gsm322.c:823 new state 'connected mode 1' -> 'C3 camped normally'
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:3902 (ms 1) Received 'RR_REL_IND' from RR in state
wait for RR connection (location updating) (sapi 0)
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2732 RR link released after loc. upd.
<000e> gsm48_mm.c:2676 Location update failed
<000e> gsm48_mm.c:2686 Try location update later
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2688 Loc. upd. failed, retry #0
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:413 starting T3211 (loc. upd. retry delay) with 15.0 seconds
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:1143 We are camping normally as returning to MM IDLE
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:1159 Loc. upd. allowed.
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:919 new state wait for RR connection (location
updating) -> MM IDLE, location updating needed
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:909 new MM IDLE state location updating needed ->
attempting to update
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2215 Loc. upd. already pending.
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:4311 (ms 1) Received 'MM_EVENT_CELL_SELECTED' event
in state MM IDLE, attempting to update
<0005> gsm48_mm.c:2215 Loc. upd. already pending.
<0003> gsm322.c:2938 Channel synched. (ARFCN=19, snr=16, BSIC=17)
<0001> gsm322.c:2959 using DSC of 90
Can you provide me any hints on how to debug this ? Why is the
location update failing constantly ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
Maciej Grela
So far three persons have indicated their interest to join
a meeting at my place.
Considering the time it takes to drive to my place, it
probably makes sense to have the meeting at the weekend
(either Saturday or Sunday) so that there is more time
for the meeting itself. I can suggest one of the following
dates for the first meeting, somewhere between 10:00 to
18:00 on each day:
25.8. (Sa) or 26.8. (Su)
1.9. (Sa) or 2.9. (Su)
8.9. (Sa) or 9.9. (Su)
So please let me know when you have time and also make
suggestions in which Osmocom topic you are interested
in so that we can have some sort of agenda for the
meeting to make best use of the time.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de
Hello.
I'm having troubles compiling asn.1 files from
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/24_series/24.080/ASN.1/
I'm getting syntax error (syntax error at line 264 in module SS-Operations.asn: got
'SEQUENCE' expected ':') while running
erlc SS-Operations.asn
using Erlang version 15.b.1
As far as I recall Harald has done this for MAP asn.1
Are there any hints on what might be wrong?
Tried online compiler but it gives different errors in different places.
Should I use different version? Compile smth else before attempting to compile this
file? Fix syntax using some clever trick? Do some rtfm?
Any advices would be greatly appreciated.
--
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.ru
hi josephli,
> Read stored BA list mnc=01
the mobile application stores the last cells and neighbour cells (band
allocation) of each network. this way the scanning is much
faster when restarting. because you use the SIM card with MNC == 02 the
first time, there is no band allocation stored for that. the mobile will
do a full scan in this case.
> while the sim card service I am tesing is actually with mnc 00 and 02.
i know that MNC == 0 will not work until i commited improvements of cell
selection process last sunday. you should retry that, but first try with
an MNC > 0.
can you provide debug output when trying a call?
also can you provide VTY output of "show ms" before you make the call?
regards,
andreas
hi,
i just fixed some locking issues the last days. fix will follow. it took
a bit longer, because there were some race conditions. it took up to
about one hour until it crashed. my way to detect the area where the
crash happened, was to turn on buzzer before that area, and turn it off
after that area. after many hours of approximation, i finally found out
that the major crash happend during _talloc_zero. (first it looks for a
free memory chunk, then it allocates it.) since it can be called from
all contexts (main, irq, fiq), it need to be locked against any
interrupt, otherwise the memory chunk can be assigned multiple times.
(the process of _talloc_free is "atomic" and requires no locking.)
because it seems pretty stable, i think it is time to merge some
branches into the master. (i made a 6 hours call yesterday. and no crash
after bugfix ever since.) i will do that together with sylvain, if we
find the time this weekend.
currently i use the jolly/voice together with the sylvain/traffic
branch. i am able to use an isdn phone togehter with linux-call-router
and make/receive calls. audio is passed both ways. i think this is a
stage where it actually become "usable". (if not moving arround.)
one of my major work for the next weeks/months will be the neighbour
cell measurement, cell re-selection, and handover. this is essential
when moving with the phone.
regards,
andreas
Hi ,List:
search some materials, find that the decode method of AFS convolutional
code is different from the EFS`, it use RSC, and need SOVA(soft output
viterbi algorithm). am i right?
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/is-the-Viterbi-decode-for-the-AF…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've pulled git repo today, but the RSSI firmware gets an error.
apps/rssi/main.c: In function `main':
apps/rssi/main.c:896: warning: 'a' might be used uninitialized in this
function
apps/rssi/main.c:896: warning: 'e' might be used uninitialized in this
function
CC board/compal_e88/rssi.compalram.manifest.o
LD board/compal_e88/rssi.compalram.elf
OBJ board/compal_e88/rssi.compalram.bin
CC board/compal_e88/rssi.highram.manifest.o
LD board/compal_e88/rssi.highram.elf
OBJ board/compal_e88/rssi.highram.bin
CC board/compal_e88/rssi.e88loader.manifest.o
LD board/compal_e88/rssi.e88loader.elf
OBJ board/compal_e88/rssi.e88loader.bin
CC board/compal_e88/rssi.e88flash.manifest.o
LD board/compal_e88/rssi.e88flash.elf
OBJ board/compal_e88/rssi.e88flash.bin
CC board/compal_e86/rssi.compalram.manifest.o
LD board/compal_e86/rssi.compalram.elf
arm-elf-ld: region LRAM is full (board/compal_e86/rssi.compalram.elf
section .data)
make[1]: *** [board/compal_e86/rssi.compalram.elf] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory src/target/firmware'
make: *** [firmware] Error 2
$ git pull
Already up-to-date.
$
Anyone experiencing the same issue?
The last changes in the airprobe svn seem to be 17 months ago. I was
wondering whether airprobe is assumed to be stable, without need for
further development, has been superseded by a different toolkit or if it
has been abandonded.
Hello.
Right now there's no way for user of osmo_a5(..) to understand if particular cipher
(a5/3 for example) is supported or not.
Attached patch adds simple return value to osmo_a5 to fix that.
Of course I would rather see a5/3 included into mainline but in a meantime this patch
might be useful too :)
--
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.ru
Hello Andrew,
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:42:00 +0000, "Andrew Back" <andrew(a)carrierdetect.com> wrote:
>
> I bought one of those generic test SIMs from eBay that claim to work
> with HP8922 etc. testers. Now this is probably another stupid
> question, but how do I determine the IMSI and Ki? Or maybe set them
> (pySim-prog.py doesn't seem to work with it).
For the IMSI you can read the appropriate EF of the SIM (the phone
does the same to get the IMSI). Ki usually cannot be read back but
because A3/A8 for a Test SIM is GSM XOR you can calculate Ki from
the SIM response to the RUN GSM ALGORITHM command. OpenBSC contains
code for the GSM XOR algorithm, this should give enough hints for
how the calculation is done.
For setting IMSI and Ki you most certainly have to contact the seller
of the SIM card and hope that he can/will tell you the details.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de
osmocom-commitlog-request(a)lists.osmocom.org wrote:
> The branch, zecke/work-with-nitb has been created
> at 2076448d458ce1271dcd4d584fe276a8b8857e35 (commit)
>
> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
> http://cgit.osmocom.org/cgit/osmocom-bb/commit/?id=2076448d458ce1271dcd4d58…
>
> commit 2076448d458ce1271dcd4d584fe276a8b8857e35
> Author: Holger Hans Peter Freyther<zecke(a)selfish.org>
> Date: Mon Nov 26 17:15:07 2012 +0100
>
> mobile: Do the LU with a IMSI... to deal with changing NITBs..
>
> NITB will not ask for the IMSI if the TMSI is not known... work around
> and do the LU with the IMSI..
hi holger,
i saw your patch, but i did not like it. i just breaks the way location
updating is done by standard. it is a workaround and not committed to
master, but i think this should be an option for a baseband stack that
is designed to test an play with. therefore i made a patch to configure
this option via vty. it is not tested, but it obviously should work.
regards,
andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'd the same problem. Now, my C118 is bricked. :-(
I'm now waiting for my Bus Pirate in order to unbrick it.
Does anybody knows a fast way to do it?
Should I use the test points (maybe those who are accessible from the
battery compartment) or even directly to the nor flash?
Many thanks in advance!
- -Chris
On 11/27/2012 12:00 PM, baseband-devel-request(a)lists.osmocom.org wrote:
> Send baseband-devel mailing list submissions to
> baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/baseband-devel or, via
> email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> baseband-devel-request(a)lists.osmocom.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> baseband-devel-owner(a)lists.osmocom.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of baseband-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Unable to flash firmware (Akib Sayyed) 2. Re: Unable to flash
> firmware (Alexander Huemer) 3. Re: Unable to flash firmware (Akib
> Sayyed) 4. Re: Unable to flash firmware (Akib Sayyed)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:30:30 +0300 From: Akib Sayyed
> <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> To: baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org
> Subject: Unable to flash firmware Message-ID:
> <CAMG-S93etEd9b_zo-YiwXWdRwBZiXzx=fa8SWjJzZVqxz486Dw(a)mail.gmail.com>
>
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear all i am unable to flash firmware of C118 with RSSI.bin
>
> i am using 64bit Ubuntu.and 64bit gnu toolchain
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQtK0BAAoJEDfL/pqB6n6N3dAQAJLpkD+4MVJbzfBHDt6mepN6
OcXyX/EbgZkN7zZY4ulRadlqyMvq7MH7pN9zv1sRk+2oMWRTEOwHeT1xG8Lfoukp
J4GMTY21bv6Ov0QLQOisxydRH4TQ7riJGfSbATPA6VBUMQWuxrws140BFDslXaPk
8Vk9o5a2G9kQTbLdJp/tqxjKnlLZ3m22qSgph0O1uV7w4e82tc45rOX8FiAps7f2
cCjGfbphjpb+GVx/OT5mSTaKseYAPyLsm2n1CvTbFYm0OVlJ9d8Pp/iVluQdrPdQ
pBLpF/MFPdqw7swUTXTSjL5PFjhBnwz1b0hImdoFBG/uHRGrU8l8sG4ll553DWtw
OnPEo1lEDkPdoRY0vpqYWVhrf6t1b54k5cc+ISKVvLweRoscMjkU7DBdzwuSyIQv
FVLk9cLatp33ogCqpzinebEBNl6eQpa869c+MC2ii/Y+A82QRiyhSs6JMmYOCYRg
jMiw/0lZIZcUEzHfGm75X7LnyfEyPDaG39MWl8m/xU/1aQhZHN4p23sKrqEAaZQp
z439nICJoCybsPsPDZiz1XEqcD4lNVVWvba6Ofd+cNKNzSJb3Y8IjUFFPwPyCCw6
dlkgqo52xBnQvb3PzAv+JTUkFesdGqyvcSOMsnFxB8zZGl3pkRn0XPnX+0TsLZdC
B701/yHCM9CXYeckOYft
=Rsu7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Dear all i am unable to flash firmware of C118 with RSSI.bin
i am using 64bit Ubuntu.and 64bit gnu toolchain
--
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed(a)gmail.com
akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:25:19 +0000, "Andrew Back" <andrew(a)carrierdetect.com> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get some MS test equipment working and have programmed a
> SIM with pysim-prog.py, but the tester has a configuration field for
> RAND and I cannot see how to set this on the SIM. In fact this has
> confused me as I thought the network always supplied this...
Most certainly the RAND value of your MS tester is the value which
is sent during authentication. All MS testers I have seen so far
allow to configure this value, either use random data or set it
to a fixed value.
> I have the IMSI, Ki, MCC and MNC set the same on the tester and SIM,
> but tests don't get very far and fail with "incorrect SRES".
I would expect that you need a SIM card which supports XOR for
A3/A8. This algorithm is the only one I have seen on nearly all
MS tests sets I have access to. Those test sets usually don't
support COMP128 and its variants (I guess your SIM card only supports
this algorithm), so you need a SIM card which uses the same algorithm
as the MS test set.
However if you can set a fixed RAND value on the MS test set you can
check what your SIM card will return with this RAND and set Kc and
SRES on the test set to those values.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de
i ordered stuff to modify phones. just waiting for them to be delivered
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Marten Christophe <technosabby(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello Akib,
>
>
> Have you able to sniff TCH channel or intercept other phone calls by
> OsmocomBB
>
> Regards,
> dev
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > phone with filter rework will work right and i also will be able to sniff
> > traffic on 1900mhz witnh burst_ind.but my issue is how to tell code of
> > app_ccch to sniff 1900 mhz instead of 1800 as they share same arfcn no??
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:24:45AM +0300, Akib Sayyed wrote:
> >> > Guys is wanted to know if there is any tweak that can allow me to use
> >> > 900/1800 C118 phone on 1900 band.
> >>
> >> you have to remove the shielding cover and replace the 1800 band filters
> >> with footprint-compatible 1900 MHz filters. It's possible, but requires
> >> good SMD soldering skills and access to the right parts.
> >>
> >> You can also remove the filters completely. This will hovever
> >> significantly degrade receiver performance in the presence of
> >> out-of-band interferers.
> >>
> >> --
> >> - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
> >> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> >>
> >>
> ============================================================================
> >> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
> >> (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch.
> >> A6)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Akib Sayyed
> > Matrix-Shell
> > akibsayyed(a)gmail.com
> > akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com
> > Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
> >
> >
>
--
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed(a)gmail.com
akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
osmocom-commitlog-request(a)lists.osmocom.org wrote:
> commit 73a809e57b8a531b9b8a33b6841ed3df2ea22620
> Author: Harald Welte<laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
> Date: Tue Nov 20 10:13:44 2012 +0100
>
> Tell L1CTL_FBSB_REQ the expected received signal level
>
hi harald,
please note that cell_log.c and mobile (gsm322.c) use signed uint8_t for
real rx-level (dbm). i think you should use dbm2rxlev() before handing
it to l1ctl_tx_fbsb_req().
regards,
andreas
Guys is wanted to know if there is any tweak that can allow me to use
900/1800 C118 phone on 1900 band.
please let me know.
--
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed(a)gmail.com
akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
Hi All,
This is small patch that fixes wrong printing of scanning frequencies due
powerscan:
<0003> gsm322.c:2794 Scanning power for all frequencies.
<0003> gsm322.c:2855 Scanning frequencies. (0..0)
..
<0003> gsm322.c:2855 Scanning frequencies. (512(DCS)..512(DCS))
..
<0003> gsm322.c:2855 Scanning frequencies. (955..955)
with this fix:
<0003> gsm322.c:2797 Scanning power for all frequencies.
<0003> gsm322.c:2860 Scanning frequencies. (0..124)
..
<0003> gsm322.c:2860 Scanning frequencies. (512(DCS)..885(DCS))
..
<0003> gsm322.c:2860 Scanning frequencies. (955..1023)
Thanks,
Pavel
Hello,
I'm trying to get some MS test equipment working and have programmed a
SIM with pysim-prog.py, but the tester has a configuration field for
RAND and I cannot see how to set this on the SIM. In fact this has
confused me as I thought the network always supplied this...
I have the IMSI, Ki, MCC and MNC set the same on the tester and SIM,
but tests don't get very far and fail with "incorrect SRES".
Any ideas?
Regards,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
http://carrierdetect.com