I tried to install CalypsoBTS have libosmocore installed, osmo-bts osmobsc,
libosmo-netif, libosmo-abis, ortp, trx, libosmo-dsp everything went without
errors, following the instructions I created: touch ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg
, then when you run : osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg-l
~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3-P-C --debug=DRLL:CC:MM:RR:RSL:NM shows me:<0005>
bsc_init.c:498 Failed to parse the config file:
'/root/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg' file tried to create as administrator but
without success , pleas help me
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Calypso-BTS-tp4026753.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello! I Need Help
I install these three programs OpenBTS, OsmocomBB, Asterisk
Then run them, Everything works well
OpenBTS sent an SMS to my phones
I answered and he checked me
I registered into OpenBTS a second phone
I tried to transfer SMS between phones - all good
but when I try to call from one to another I did not get
Asterisk writes
================================================================
*CLI> Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 755803415(a)127.0.0.1 for
seqno 179 (Critical Response) -- See
wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/SIP+Retransmissions
Packet timed out after 32001ms with no response
================================================================
Why?
What do I do?
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/OpenBTS-OsmocomBB-Asterisk-tp402…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
1) Is it possible to increase the number of phones from two to three or more
phones as TS in osmocom-BB? plz answer just this question. I strongly need
it's answer, if NOT I STOP my working..
2) what's this ERROR : "DSP Error Status: 24"
thank you.
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/osmocom-BB-tp4026767.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi guys,
I think some of us would like to move to redmine and start using public tickets more frequently. So in case we move there are some topics to be discussed and I would like to start with a couple of them right now.
Tickets:
Redmine has a global linear sequence of ticket numbers. If we move from many tracs to a single redmine we can either:
* not import tickets
* only import from one project
* deal with changing ticket numbers
In terms of installations the GMR trac is broken in regard to tickets, there are some for SDR that are probably not being fixed anytime soon, baseband might be relevant and OpenBSC is unlikely to be relevant. I don't think we have ever used ticket reference in OpenBSC commit messages so in terms of OpenBSC having changing ticket numbers would not be a big deal. E.g. we could add a custom field with the old trac number?
Wiki:
We have external references that should be redirected to the new place. Is there any way besides maintaining a list in the apache2/nginx configuration and making redirects as we find broken references? Can we proactively manage this? Is anybody willing to come up with a script and nginx configuration for doing this?
kind regards
holger
Hi all,
I've a question about transceiver module in osmocomBB.. I'm gonna to
increase the number of TS as the number of connected phones.. now I'll be
able to sync 2 phones but in order to have more TS => more traffic channel ,
I should be able to sync more phones as TS , how can I? plz help me..
tanx.
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/More-phones-through-Transceiver-…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> On 12 Dec 2016, at 18:13, ak-74*** ... <87078838964(a)mail.ru> wrote:
>
> root@osmocombb-VirtualBox:~# osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg -l ~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3 -P -C —debug=DRLL:DCC:DMM:DRR:DRSL:DNM
>
> DB: Failed to init database. Please check the option settings.
>
if you look at the debian/control libdbd-sqlite3 needs to be installed to run osmo-nitb. Did you install that?
holger
https://youtu.be/YJ_qkJEFNcg
UGS is a portable system designed to send SMS messages and data to GSM
phones in a pre-defined area.
Unlike existed advertisement systems
UGS sends normal or flash SMS instead of broadcast messages (receipt of
broadcast messages can be disabled by mobile phone user);
UGS is an independent stand-alone system, which does not require any
cooperation with cellular operators.
UGS does not use phone numbers of mobile phones, hence there is no need in
the lists of phone numbers to be obtained from various sources. Those lists
are often not complete, outdated, irrelevant and costly.
The UGS can be used for commercial or security purposes:
Send commercial advertisements, announcements, free gift coupons, useful
information or welcome messages in specific places: shopping areas, banks,
restaurants, train or bus stations, exhibitions, shows, etc.
Send warning messages or requests to the people in the case of emergency.
Send messages with the request to contact police to potential crime
witnesses in the crime areas.
SMS messages can be sent:
To New in the Area or
To Known in the Area or
To pre-defined groups or
To everyone,
The UGS can be installed in a fixed location or carried to the places of
need in a small, hand carry suitcase.
Potential users of the system are small stores, large organizations,
advertisement providers, rescue services, police forces and others.
System can be operated locally or remotely via the Internet.
SMS sent by the system are free of charge; neither owner of the system nor
mobile phone users pay for them.
The system is comprised of compact Base Station Unit and notebook computer.
Because of unique sophisticated algorithm implemented in the system, the UGS
transmits very low power and does not interfere with existed GSM networks.
User can define any phone number or name of the sender, which will appear on
the screens of mobile phones.
Main specifications:
Frequency coverage: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz
Number of SMS: No limitations
Number of handsets: No limitations
System output: From 10mW up to 10w (adjustable)
Power: 220V / 110V / 24V / 12-16V or Batteries
Operation Range: 10...1500 m
SMS language: All languages
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/USRP-Free-BULK-SMS-SMS-device-tp…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dear Osmocom Community,
[please respect the Reply-To and post all follow-up discussion to this
to openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org, so we avoid having long threads
cross-posted to several mailing lists.]
>From 2012 to 2016 we were running a series of small, invitation-only
Osmocom Developer Conferences. Access was intentionally restricted
to those community members who have demonstrated an existing track
record of contribution to any of the projects under the Osmocom
umbrella.
This format of a small, tightly knit group of about 20 people has been
successful over the years, and I have received a lot of positive
feedback from past participants.
On the other hand, the Osmocom project has grown in scope and diversity,
and some of those projects don't have all that much relationship to each
other - except being started by people from within the same group.
There's the cellular communications (GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS and hopefully at
some point LTE) protocols which is attracting a lot of professional
users. And then there's pure community projects like rtl-sdr,
OsmocomBB, OsmocomGMR and many other efforts.
Particularly the cellular infrastructure projects (OsmoBTS, OsmoPCU,
OsmoBTS, OsmoNITB, OsmoSGSN, OpenGGSN, OsmoIuh & co) are somehow
"standing out" of the othe projects in the context of having a wider
user bsae, and in that user base also primarily commercial users.
So I'd like to start a discussion on how to possibly change the event
format to accomodate the various interests and parties. I definitely
don't want to loose the "annual meeting of old friends" atmosphere,
while at the same time also opening up to other interested parties.
One idea would be to keep OsmoDevCon as-is and have a separate event
where non-contributing/developing users / sysadmins / system integrators
could also be attending.
Another idea would be to split into a 'user day' and 'developer days'
format. This is something the netfilter developer workshops have been
using for many years, and from my limited insight quite successfully so.
The "user day" is more like a traditional tech conference, with a large
auditorium and talks oriented towards users / sysadmins / integrators of
the software. The "developer days" are the invitation-only part, for
known contributing developers only, similar to what we have at
OsmoDevCon.
Having both events (or both parts of an event) back-to-back has the
advantage that a large number of potential speakers for the 'user day'
are already present, and they don't have to travel yet another time.
One could even structure it further and say we have one user day, one
public 'Osmocom cellular developer day' and then the closed 'OsmoDevCon
classic', maybe reduced from 4 days to 3 or even 2 days only?
What is the general opinion about this?
Are there people lurking on this list who would be interested in
attending a public 'user day' or even 'developer day' about the Osmocom
cellular projects, with presentations and workshops around topics such
as running Osmocom based cellular networks?
In terms of when/where, I would suggest to keep the tradition of April
in Berlin/Germany. But I'm of course very happy if somebody wants to
host it some place else...
Regards, and looking forward to meeting you [again] in 2017,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
