On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:06:01PM +0100, Max wrote:
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev,
autoconf, automake, libtool, dh-autoreconf, libdpkg-perl, git, doxygen, libpcsclite-dev,
pkg-config
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev, autoconf, automake, libtool,
dh-autoreconf, libdpkg-perl, git, doxygen, libpcsclite-dev, pkg-config, quilt
yes.
Description: Open Source MObile COMmunications CORE
library
+ Metapackage for Open Source MObile COMmunications CORE library.
Well, this description is not up to standard of Debian. So
we simply fix a warning for the sake of fixing the warning.
Is this really an improvement?
+Upstream Authors:
sure.
GNU General Public License, Version 2 or later
+ see "/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2"
no idea.
The Debian packaging is:
Copyright (C) 2010 Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
-
-# Please chose a license for your packaging work. If the program you package
-# uses a mainstream license, using the same license is the safest choice.
-# Please avoid to pick license terms that are more restrictive than the
-# packaged work, as it may make Debian's contributions unacceptable upstream.
-# If you just want it to be GPL version 3, leave the following lines in.
-
-and is licensed under the GPL version 3,
-see "/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3".
-
-# Please also look if there are files or directories which have a
-# different copyright/license attached and list them here.
The copyright file is not up to standards with debian. We silent
the warning without doing the work needed for a debian package. Can
we do it properly?
holger