On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:06:01PM +0100, Max wrote:
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev, autoconf, automake, libtool, dh-autoreconf, libdpkg-perl, git, doxygen, libpcsclite-dev, pkg-config +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), autotools-dev, autoconf, automake, libtool, dh-autoreconf, libdpkg-perl, git, doxygen, libpcsclite-dev, pkg-config, quilt
yes.
Description: Open Source MObile COMmunications CORE library
- Metapackage for Open Source MObile COMmunications CORE library.
Well, this description is not up to standard of Debian. So we simply fix a warning for the sake of fixing the warning. Is this really an improvement?
+Upstream Authors:
sure.
GNU General Public License, Version 2 or later
- see "/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2"
no idea.
The Debian packaging is:
Copyright (C) 2010 Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
-# Please chose a license for your packaging work. If the program you package -# uses a mainstream license, using the same license is the safest choice. -# Please avoid to pick license terms that are more restrictive than the -# packaged work, as it may make Debian's contributions unacceptable upstream. -# If you just want it to be GPL version 3, leave the following lines in.
-and is licensed under the GPL version 3, -see "/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3".
-# Please also look if there are files or directories which have a -# different copyright/license attached and list them here.
The copyright file is not up to standards with debian. We silent the warning without doing the work needed for a debian package. Can we do it properly?
holger