baseband-devel

baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org

2022 discussions

10 Dec '11

Hi, I am using this version of GNU Arm. http://www.gnuarm.com/bu-2.15_gcc-3.4.3-c-c++-java_nl-1.12.0_gi-6.1.exe Regards, RM On 12/4/11, Juantxi <juantxipazos(a)yahoo.es> wrote: > > Hello, what version of gnuarm uses? > thank >

1 0

Re: RFC: Osmocom developer workshop 2012
by Harald Welte 05 Dec '11

05 Dec '11

Hi! Thinking a bit more about timing, it seems that the second half of March is a good idea. April is a bad idea, at least for the first two weeks, as this is easter holiday time in a lot of German states. This will cause lots of tourists, as well as full hotels, trains, flights, etc. So I'd propose something like four days in the second half of march. Should we try to overlap/extend a weekend? I guess this would help people with e regular dayjob, as not as many holidays would be required. If there are no objections in the next 48 hours, I will talk to C-Base about availability during that timeframe. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

3 4

Script for parsing boot loader into COFF
by R M 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

Hi, Is there a script for parsing the boot loader code into a COFF format so that it can be loaded into IDA? Regards, RM

1 0

MTK and Infineon-based phones
by Martin Hinner 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

Hi Marcin, On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Marcin Mielczarczyk <marcin.mielczarczyk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Note, that on the market there is much more Mediatek phones based on ARM7 > (MT622x) than on ARM9 (MT623x). You are right, it makes sense. My mistake. I was only working with flash dumps so far... I have spent some time analyzing mtk-phone project. There is a lot of files missing, but the situation is not so bad. My feeling is that some of the files were simply deleted from the project... (interrupted upload?) I made a list of all files needed to link binary image (from .lis file). Then I did: find . -name '*.c' Then I ran ar l on al mtk-lib .lib files (these can be quite easily disassembled). And finally diff helped to find what is missing... We're missing only these files (no .obj in .lib or .c is present in the project): -lic.c -drvflash.c -l1c_trace.c -l1d2_trace.c -l1d3_trace.c -l1d_edge_trace.c -l1d_trace.c -l1sc_trace.c -l1trc.c -l4drv.c -sst_decrypt.c -sst_intrctrl.c -sst_secure.c -trcmod.c I think none of these are needed for our stuff. Then we are missing .c files, but have .obj in .lib (only important files) dp_engine.lib: awb_bitstream.c (unknown for what is this) dsp_ram.lib: ddload.c dsp_ram.lib: dsp_ptch_6223.c (we can get this from binary) dsp_ram.lib: idma.c l1.lib: l1csm.c l1.lib: l1dsm.c l1.lib: m*.c (it's a lot of files !!!!!!!!!!!!) In fact this is end of all important routines... Tracing functions: l1.lib: l1i_amr_trace.c l1.lib: l1i_cs_trace.c l1.lib: l1sc_trace.c l1.lib: l1t_amr_trace.c l1.lib: l1c3_trace.c l1.lib: l1c4_trace.c l1.lib: l1c_csd_trace.c l1.lib: l1c_trace.c l1.lib: l1d2_trace.c l1.lib: l1d3_trace.c l1.lib: l1d_edge_trace.c l1.lib: l1d_trace.c l1.lib: rftool_gsm.c (shows how to call various functions) Only for testing: l1.lib: l1tst_afc.c l1.lib: l1tst_agc.c l1.lib: l1tst_cfg.c l1.lib: l1tst_cont.c l1.lib: l1tst_fcb.c l1.lib: l1tst_fhc.c l1.lib: l1tst_nbtx.c l1.lib: l1tst_pm.c l1.lib: l1tst_ul.c I have already tried to disassemble some of them and it all makes sense, most of functions are very simple and some files are not even needed. My feeling is that we have all needed to understand the DSP functionality / L1 part of the ARM code! The biggest problem is that m*.c files depend on hardware (a lot of #ifdefs), so this needs to be analyzed on firmware downloaded from hardware. [ Question: why such cryptic names such as m12170.c ? ] I also have list of functions in those files, if anyone's interested in helping me with locating what is important and what is not... (34 kB). Martin

2 2

MTK and Infineon-based phones
by Martin Hinner 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hi, I spent a few hours today looking at CCC presentations and osmocom code. Good and interesting work! I have a couple of questions... This is my first experience with GSM phones reverse engineering, so sorry if I am wrong, but it seems to be quite difficult for me to obtain four Calypso-based phones (yes, I know I can order them from webshop for a few euros, but I will need more of them if my experiments are successfull). On the other hand, I have access to very cheap phones using Infineon PMB7880 (C166 + DSP) or MTK (ARM9) chipsets. Currently, I do have some information (datasheet&code) for MTK platform, and I see there is implementation of "secondary bootloader" for these phones, but no layer1 yet. I also have very basic documentation of Infineon SoC, plus I have knowledge of the C166 code and I can very easily play with it (reverse engineer firmware & assemble my own code). Is it feasible to create layer1 implementation for Infineon and/or MTK? Is there anyone willing to help with this? Here are my additional questions related to the above question: - Is there any documentation of mask-rom bootloader for Infineon C166 core? - At this moment I do not understand how does the DSP on the PMB7880 work, if RF part is accessible from both DSP and C166 or just the DSP. - How is it with Infineon DSP code, is it present in flash memory, or is it ROM-only thing? Anyone has the code dump? - Is anyone (who has experience with Calypso layer1) willing to help with implementing the same on Infineon or MTK platform? - If anyone has any resources for these two plaforms, I would be grateful if you can send them to me. I will add that I have spent many many nights disassembling car control units using Infineon/Siemens C166 core (since 2002?), so Infineon platform is very attractive for me (the flash is only 2MB for some phones, it's easy to read code, etc...). Thanks, Martin

6 12

[PATCH] i2c: fix maximum address an I2C chip can assign
by Alan Carvalho de Assis 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

I2C bus support up to 128 devices (mask 0x7F), but current calypso driver is masked it to 64 (0x3F). I discover it because Motorola W220 has an I/O expander PCA9537 at address 0x49 which could be reached. Signed-off-by: Alan Carvalho de Assis <acassis(a)gmail.com>

2 1

RFC Wiki re-org of bb.osmocom.org
by Holger Hans Peter Freyther 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

Hi, I have recently tried to find some information in our wiki and it was more difficult than I think it should be. I would like to propose and then implement some restructuring. So first of all I think we have good enough content, it is just a matter of structure. Front Page: I would like to have a very simple and structured entry. Mainly pointing to other projects, History, Software and Hardware? Hardware Pages Our hardware pages are mostly the same but actually quite different. I would like to find the following information on each page: - Which firmware/board to use (compal_e88)... - Picture of assembled/disassembled device - Knowledge we have I would like to move all Hardware/MotorolaCXX. The example would be to have hardware/ like this[1] and hardware/MotorolaC118 like this[2]. Software Pages: We have the Getting Started but there appears to be a gap from having a toolchain (or building one) and knowing how the various parts are connected to each other. I have not thought about it too much though. History Pages: I would move some older information in there. E.g. our never started/finished Calypso based design, maybe some parts of the project history. comments? ideas? holger [1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start#supported.hardware.-.router.type [2] http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/whr-g125

3 2

uplink sniffing
by Lorik Sefaj 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

Hi all, Just received my C123 (from http://shop.sysmocom.de/) with filter rework and it works great. I have one problem with the "burst*.dat" files when i do uplink sniffing, basically there are no files produced and when they are produced most of the time they are empty? This doesn't happen when i do downlink sniffing. Is this a stupid question or am I missing something... cheers, L.

4 5

OsmocomBB Bootstrapping
by Kurtis Heimerl 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

Hello baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org! I've just started my first OsmocomBB project, using a Motorola V171 and the source code in the main git repository. The short hand version of the story is that we're looking into modifying the GSM MS stack to allow for the BTS to save some power. This is research being done at the University of California, and we're sorta amazed at how wonderful OsmocomBB is for this particular project. Thanks for the work! Progress has generally been good, and I've been able to build and run the "hello world" e99 application. Following that, I've moved onto the mobile app... and run into an issue that I can't seem to resolve by searching your mailing lists. Basically, each individual process runs fine: osmocon installs the compal_e99/layer1.compalram.bin image onto a c155 device mobile connects (though it doesn't see the SIM for some reason...) and the terminal is available and active. I'm not able to do much though, as the MS isn't on yet. Upon turning the MS on, it scans for a while, eventually detecting my own cell tower. Terminal is active during this search. Unfortunately, shortly after detecting and syncing with my tower (ARFCN 51), the terminal freezes. osmocon begins repeating the following error: "Failed to write msg to the socket.." and nothing else moves. Kaput. Terminal does not respond to any messages sent. This is my problem, as I'd like to make a call. PRE-POWERUP mobile: http://pastebin.com/tPm9ux83 POST-POWERUP mobile: http://pastebin.com/fMD1Kth6 osmocon: http://pastebin.com/nc3QGGgD terminal says: kheimerl@darth-maul /tmp $ telnet localhost 4247 Trying ::1... Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. Welcome to the OsmocomBB control interface OsmocomBB> % (MS 1) % No service. My intuition is that I've missed setting some key variables in the related configuration files (~/.osmocom/osmocom.cfg, ~/.osmocom/bb/mobile.cfg). though I can't find ANY documentation about what's supposed to be in those things. Any and all help would be appreciated.

4 4

Re: osmocom-bb cygwin
by R M 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

Hi, Its better you send the mail to the list rather than just to me. In that way you get more help. I have built osmocom using cygwin. But I am unable to get the code downloaded into the phone. I am facing timing issues. I am still looking into the issue though. The instructions to install cygwin are found at: http://cygwin.com/. By default cygwin installs just the basic tools. Once you have installed the basic tools, you have to run the installer again to get the tools required for building osmocom. The tools required are given in the Wiki at this link: http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/GettingStarted. Once you have done that you need to install gnu arm. In the same wiki you have the links to download the cygwin version of GNU Arm. The ftdi cable I use is at this link:http://www.sparkfun.com/products/8772. Regards, RM On 11/24/11, Juantxi <juantxipazos(a)yahoo.es> wrote: > hello, > osmocom-bb got compile using cygwin? > packages could tell me that you downloaded? > which cable did you use? > > I am interested in doing > thanks >

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

baseband-devel