baseband-devel February 2017

baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org

8 participants
15 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Engagetted !
by Sébastien Lorquet 14 Oct '25

14 Oct '25

http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/29/researchers-eavesdrop-on-encrypted-gsm-c… Congrats!

7 7

Calypso BTS
by phreaker1983 16 Nov '19

16 Nov '19

I tried to install CalypsoBTS have libosmocore installed, osmo-bts osmobsc, libosmo-netif, libosmo-abis, ortp, trx, libosmo-dsp everything went without errors, following the instructions I created: touch ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg , then when you run : osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg-l ~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3-P-C --debug=DRLL:CC:MM:RR:RSL:NM shows me:<0005> bsc_init.c:498 Failed to parse the config file: '/root/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg' file tried to create as administrator but without success , pleas help me -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Calypso-BTS-tp4026753.html Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

6 13

OpenBTS OsmocomBB Asterisk
by trixbox.t 14 Jul '18

14 Jul '18

Hello! I Need Help I install these three programs OpenBTS, OsmocomBB, Asterisk Then run them, Everything works well OpenBTS sent an SMS to my phones I answered and he checked me I registered into OpenBTS a second phone I tried to transfer SMS between phones - all good but when I try to call from one to another I did not get Asterisk writes ================================================================ *CLI> Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 755803415(a)127.0.0.1 for seqno 179 (Critical Response) -- See wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/SIP+Retransmissions Packet timed out after 32001ms with no response ================================================================ Why? What do I do? -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/OpenBTS-OsmocomBB-Asterisk-tp402… Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

6 14

Osmocombb as a Zombie
by Duarte 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

Hey guys, first of all I want to express my deep respect for this project, this is truly amazing project and very well developed. Second, I'm doing a few studies regarding GSM security (no, I'm not hacking.) and I need to develop a feature for osmocombb, which is: the ability to turn the L23 app as a zombie (C unix domain socket) waiting for instructions (e.g.: connect to the network with predefined parameters (IMSI), collect RAND, send sms,...). Is there any documentation or flow regarding the code? It's very hard for a non C coder to follow the flow... Or is there someone that can help me in the Architectural level? Thank you.

3 2

Re: Virtual layer 1 - Questions
by Harald Welte 03 Mar '17

03 Mar '17

Hi Sebastian, On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Sebastian Stumpf wrote: > The virtual layer 1 is currently in a state where the l23 app can > successfully connect to the bts and most of the signaling messages > will be forwarded and handled. TCH is not yet implemented. this is excellent news! Thanks for sticking with this and pushing it forward. > - Trying to initiate a call via the mobile vty will result in > VTY: > call 1 123 > OsmocomBB# > % (MS 1) > % Call has been rejected > call 1 123 > OsmocomBB# > % (MS 1) > % Call has been released > And no actual call setup message is transfered over the Um interface. > What could be reasons for that? I am using the test-sim option the > mobile app offers. I'm not sure if this is the root cause, but it seems there is some timeslot mis-matches in your traces. The Immediate Assignment contains TS 2 or TS 7, but I see Uplink frames for FACH on TS0, which is impossible (TS0 never has a channel combination with FACCH). Also, The uplink frames don't have the Uplink bit set in the GSMTAP header. This is a bit confusing, and I think it would be a good idea to introduce some consistency/invariant checking on both sides, i.e. the BTS should drop all non-uplink frames received, and the MS should drop all uplink frames received. I'm also surprised to see you're seeing an immediate assignment reject in downlink. This should only happen if all channels are allocated and the BTS is out of resources. Also, in your traces, there are typically several frames that are on the same timeslot in the same GSM frame number. This is not possible (probably related to the wrong TS above?). At maximum, there can be one L2 signalling message for a given TS + FN. Also, on the real radio interface a MAC block takes typically four frames on that channel, so the actual rate is lower. > - Occasionaly the T3210 timer is fired, which causes a new registering > within the network. well, it means that something got lost between MS and MSC for such a long time (between sending the LU REQ and receving a response) that the MS gives up. > LOG: > gsm48_mm.c:336 timer T3210 (loc. upd. timeout) has fired > How can i prevent that? The underlying problem must be resolved. On the simulated L1 you shouldn't loose messages, so this shouldn't happen if all messages arrive as expected on both sides. > - I did not implement a tdma or multiframe scheduler in the mobile > uplink as the logical channel is directly put to the gsmtap-header and > thus known by the bts. As Harald used a multiframe based scheduling > for the bts downlink, i wonder if this might be necessary, though. To > submit msgs with the correct frame number for example. It is primarily a question of how real the simulation should be. By using a multiframe scheduler one can make sure that the actual bandwidth/speed of GSM is maintained even over a virtual L1. Also, on the BTS side it must be present to schedule the BCCH (system information, ...) without which a MS would never even see the cell. I think one can do without on the MS side, but then the BTS must basically queue the incoming frames until the respective frame number indicated in the frame matches the current frame number. > - In my wireshark capture files, the gsmtap messages sent over the > multicast sockets are only recognized as UDP messages. I have to > "cast" them with the wireshark context menu "Decode as...". Why? This seems because you're using a non-standard port for the messages: In the capture I see UDP port 6666 rather than the IANA-registered port for GSMTAP which is 4729. > I would be super happy if someone of you could check out my project > (osmo-bts, branch stumpf/virt-phy + osmocom-bb, branch > stumpf/virt-phy) try to run it with the config files lying within the > project folders and tell me the problems they see :). I'll have a look, but not straight away now, sorry. > Here you can find a wireshark capture file of 2 mobiles connecting to > a virt bts. I also tried to init calls from both of them but the call > setup is not send. Already the LU is not working stable, so I think the first step is to stabilize this. You can see in packet 740 that the MS is sneding a LU Req, which the BTS forwards in frame 741 as RSL message to the NITB. The NITB then responds with an IDENTITY REQUEST which can be seen on RSL but which seems to disappear in the BTS without being ever sent on the virtual Um interface. As a result, the MS never sends the identity response, and the NITB will give up. I also see that the RACH requesets all are sent with a bogus frame number: 42. This will not work. The RACH request needs to be sent with the current frame number at the time being. Also, RACH retransmissions are happening way too quick. See Packets 600...644 where there are 7 RACH requests all within soemething like 10ms. The BTS then allocates 7 channels rather than one, ... So I think those lower-layer issues should be addressed before moving on to voice calls. Keep up the good work! Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

2 6

Re: Flashing Problem: C117
by Craig Comstock 18 Feb '17

18 Feb '17

You know that generally flashing the phone isn't needed. You can load all of the different osmocom images just with the osmocon loader into ram and "do things". The flashing can brick your device. Just my $0.02, Craig -------------------------------------------- On Sat, 2/18/17, Dennis Schneck <dennisschneck(a)web.de> wrote: Subject: Flashing Problem: C117 To: baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org Date: Saturday, February 18, 2017, 2:44 AM Hello, i try to Flash a Motorola C117. But did not work ... what did i wrong ? $ sudo host/osmocon/osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123xor target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 00 .. got 4 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 .... got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @ Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD read_file(target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin): file_size=27072, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=27079 got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/27079) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/27079) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/27079) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (16384/27079) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (20480/27079) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (24576/27079) handle_write(): 2503 bytes (27079/27079) handle_write(): finished got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 03 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 42 B Received DOWNLOAD ACK from phone, your code is running now! Received DOWNLOAD ACK from phone, your code is running now! battery_compal_e88_init: starting up OsmocomBB Loader (revision osmocon_v0.0.0-1773-g0cdf4b0-modified) ====================================================================== Running on compal_e88 in environment compalram $ sudo host/osmocon/osmoload memdump 0x000000 0x2000 compal_loader.bin [sudo] password for builder: Dumping 8192 bytes of memory at 0x0 to file compal_loader.bin ...................................done. builder@buildervm:~/build/osmocom-bb/src$ sudo host/osmocon/osmoload funlock 0x010000 0x10000 Unlocking 65536 bytes of flash at 0x10000 requesting flash info to determine block layout chip 0 at 0x00000000 of 2097152 bytes in 2 regions region 0 with 31 blocks of 65536 bytes each block 0 with 65536 bytes at 0x00000000 on chip 0 block 1 with 65536 bytes at 0x00010000 on chip 0 block 2 with 65536 bytes at 0x00020000 on chip 0 block 3 with 65536 bytes at 0x00030000 on chip 0 block 4 with 65536 bytes at 0x00040000 on chip 0 block 5 with 65536 bytes at 0x00050000 on chip 0 block 6 with 65536 bytes at 0x00060000 on chip 0 block 7 with 65536 bytes at 0x00070000 on chip 0 block 8 with 65536 bytes at 0x00080000 on chip 0 block 9 with 65536 bytes at 0x00090000 on chip 0 block 10 with 65536 bytes at 0x000a0000 on chip 0 block 11 with 65536 bytes at 0x000b0000 on chip 0 block 12 with 65536 bytes at 0x000c0000 on chip 0 block 13 with 65536 bytes at 0x000d0000 on chip 0 block 14 with 65536 bytes at 0x000e0000 on chip 0 block 15 with 65536 bytes at 0x000f0000 on chip 0 block 16 with 65536 bytes at 0x00100000 on chip 0 block 17 with 65536 bytes at 0x00110000 on chip 0 block 18 with 65536 bytes at 0x00120000 on chip 0 block 19 with 65536 bytes at 0x00130000 on chip 0 block 20 with 65536 bytes at 0x00140000 on chip 0 block 21 with 65536 bytes at 0x00150000 on chip 0 block 22 with 65536 bytes at 0x00160000 on chip 0 block 23 with 65536 bytes at 0x00170000 on chip 0 block 24 with 65536 bytes at 0x00180000 on chip 0 block 25 with 65536 bytes at 0x00190000 on chip 0 block 26 with 65536 bytes at 0x001a0000 on chip 0 block 27 with 65536 bytes at 0x001b0000 on chip 0 block 28 with 65536 bytes at 0x001c0000 on chip 0 block 29 with 65536 bytes at 0x001d0000 on chip 0 block 30 with 65536 bytes at 0x001e0000 on chip 0 region 1 with 8 blocks of 8192 bytes each block 31 with 8192 bytes at 0x001f0000 on chip 0 block 32 with 8192 bytes at 0x001f2000 on chip 0 block 33 with 8192 bytes at 0x001f4000 on chip 0 block 34 with 8192 bytes at 0x001f6000 on chip 0 block 35 with 8192 bytes at 0x001f8000 on chip 0 block 36 with 8192 bytes at 0x001fa000 on chip 0 block 37 with 8192 bytes at 0x001fc000 on chip 0 block 38 with 8192 bytes at 0x001fe000 on chip 0 confirmed operation on chip 0 address 0x00010000, status FAILED operation done Thanks

1 0

Flashing Problem: target/firmware/board/compal_e88/menu.e88loader.bin mssing
by Dennis Schneck 18 Feb '17

18 Feb '17

1 0

Flashing Problem: C117 - additional info
by Dennis Schneck 18 Feb '17

18 Feb '17

1 1

Flashing Problem: C117
by Dennis Schneck 18 Feb '17

18 Feb '17

1 0

Motorola C117 - Is compal E87 ?
by Dennis Schneck 17 Feb '17

17 Feb '17

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

baseband-devel February 2017