baseband-devel June 2011

baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org

39 participants
51 discussions

by Henk

Hi, I could not resist buying a C116 for 15 euro, so I compiled osmocombb and connected a 3.3V serial cable. Of course the C116 was not in the supported list, but I was hoping it would work as it seems that it is very similar to the C115. Here is my load attempt: (used -m c123 ) but there's no loading of the image. I am not using TX mode, also I don't have a SIM installed. Anything I can try to get it working? ./osmocon -p /dev/ttyS0 -m c123xor ../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 81 .. got 4 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 .... got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @ Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin): file_size=16788, hdr_len=4, dnload_le n=16795 got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6c l Received FTMTOOL from phone, ramloader has aborted got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 65 e got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o Regards, Henk

13 years, 11 months

Help me I have a difficult problem

by adel

Hello I'm having a problem in the start mobile application ~/osmocom-bb$ cd src/host/layer23/src/mobile ~/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src/mobile$ ./mobile Copyright (C) 2008-2010 ... Contributions by ... License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Failed to parse the config file: '/etc/osmocom/osmocom.cfg' Please check or create config file using: 'touch /etc/osmocom/osmocom.cfg' ~/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src/mobile$ Please help me as soon as -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/Help-me-I-have-a-difficult-probl… Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 11 months

Motorola C115 with OsmocomBB

by Raz Sharif

Hi Folks, just wanted to know if anyone actually tried the Motorola C115 with OsmocomBB ? It appears to be difficult to source compatible phones in the UK but I did manage to get this C115 Model and wanted confirmation before hacking away at it only to find it is not going to play. The wiki states : Motorola C115/C117 It seems to be 99.9% identical with the MotorolaC123<http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/MotorolaC123>/C121/C122 series. So far, all our software (written for the MotorolaC123<http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/MotorolaC123>) is working on the C115/C117, too. The PCB is marked E87, i.e. one number less than the MotorolaC123<http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/MotorolaC123>(E88). Any feedback would be very appreciated from anyone who has had success with this particular phone from the Users side. Thanks Raz

14 years

replacing the RX filter with a balun on the c139

by Joshua Lackey

I've been going over Sylvain's report on removing the RX filters, http://www.246tnt.com/gsm/rx_filter.html, and I had some slight differences on the c139 that I'm hoping someone can help me with. Similar to Sylvain's experience, the schematic doesn't match reality. Just as Sylvain describes, the signal from the balanced output appears to be going through inductors rather than capacitors and there isn't a bridging inductor. However on my c139, the unbalanced input is missing the inductor to ground on the EGSM path and is missing the capacitor to ground on the DCS path. (Sylvain had a capacitor to ground on DCS where the schematic has an inductor to ground.) You can find a picture of what I'm looking at here: http://thre.at/c139/c139rxfilters.jpg . I've placed the c139 schematics in that directory as well, http://thre.at/c139 . My guess is that the filters in the schematics had a different unbalanced impedance than the ones they ended up placing on the c139. But I'm not an EE, and that is just a guess. I can't read the markings on the filters I have, so I can't check the unbalanced input from a data sheet. I also don't have a way to measure the components that are there now so I can't try and compute the value. My question is, does this matter? That is, should I use the same balun that Sylvain chose or should I find one with a different unbalanced impedance? Alternatively, should I use the same baluns and just install an inductor (or capacitor on DCS) to ground so that it matches Sylvain's c123? Any ideas? (As an aside, the baluns that Sylvain chose aren't perfect for the US frequency range, but they should work okay.)

14 years

bb.osmocom.org question

by Rebecca Wilson | TwinLinks

Hello, I'd like to propose a 3-way link swap with your website http://bb.osmocom.org, where you receive 2 links in exchange for one of yours. 3-way linking is a very effective link building strategy. Since you're getting the links from third party websites, they appear totally natural to search engine algorithms. Such inbound links help your website rank higher in Google and other search engines. Our partner sites that link to your site are at least 3 years old with a minimum pagerank of PR3. Visit http://twinlinks.net to submit your website. Thanks, Rebecca Wilson Founder & CEO, TwinLinks

14 years

help me i have motorola c123

by adel

hello all people i have problem i don't send call with my phone c123 any one have key of this problem help me . 0001> gsm48_rr.c:2338 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT: <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2350 (ta 1/553m ra 0xec chan_nr 0x41 MAIO 0 HSN 4 TS 1 SS 0 TSC 6) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2366 Not for us, no request. <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1890111e (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 02d01331 (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:609 MON: f=699 lev=-79 snr= 0 ber= 2 LAI=603 02 01d7 ID=b7b8 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1838b73d (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1d2818a9 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 03f86c30 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1268a36c (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 08a0c21b (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 10d86969 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0b50e58e (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0b308821 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 07c0435c (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 17107708 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 18309cae (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 018817cd (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 17d86dd2 (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:609 MON: f=699 lev=-79 snr= 0 ber= 0 LAI=603 02 01d7 ID=b7b8 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 06a045e3 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 12f0772b (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 13681856 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0d80715b (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1d1827a2 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1480220a (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1c4817ff (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2338 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT: <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2350 (ta 0/0m ra 0x1a chan_nr 0x41 MAIO 2 HSN 4 TS 1 SS 0 TSC 6) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2366 Not for us, no request. <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1e589e44 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 12f8d23a (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1878ddb0 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 05e0ac9c (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1140c7c9 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI f6088640 (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:609 MON: f=699 lev=-79 snr= 0 ber= 10 LAI=603 02 01d7 ID=b7b8 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI e2084634 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 02e03cd5 (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2338 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT: <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2350 (ta 0/0m ra 0x89 chan_nr 0x49 MAIO 0 HSN 4 TS 1 SS 1 TSC 6) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:2366 Not for us, no request. <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 03d8da99 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1ca8a7da (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1c70794c (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:609 MON: f=699 lev=-80 snr= 0 ber= 5 LAI=603 02 01d7 ID=b7b8 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 07f042d5 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0c40eb0c (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0e509fe2 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1b186325 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1b70f22f (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1190da2f (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 054875f6 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1a303414 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0bb0eda9 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 055873d6 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 13f016ed (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0f98765b (not for us) <0001> gsm48_rr.c:609 MON: f=699 lev=-79 snr= 0 ber= 0 LAI=603 02 01d7 ID=b7b8 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0bf8436d (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1b386004 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1fa01aa4 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 0b68f048 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1ec87dbd (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 11f0f27e (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 1078250f (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2081 PAGING REQUEST 1 <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 02f03d94 (not for us) <0009> gsm48_rr.c:2040 TMSI 121027b7 (not for us) -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/help-me-i-have-motorola-c123-tp3… Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

14 years

Compile error with gpsd 2.96 in layer23

by Malte Krupa

Dear folks, I recently played with osmocomBB and wanted to try out the cell_log and gsmmap feature. Therefore I tried to rebuild osmocomBB (sylvains testing tree) with gpsd 2.96 installed on archlinux kernel 2.6.38. If there is more information needed, just tell me! Error while "$make": Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/home/temal/dev/pkg/osmotemp/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src' Making all in common make[3]: Entering directory `/home/temal/dev/pkg/osmotemp/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src/common' CC l1ctl.o CC l1l2_interface.o CC sap_interface.o CC lapdm.o CC logging.o CC networks.o CC sim.o sim.c: In function ‘gsm_sim_reply’: sim.c:146:11: warning: variable ‘payload’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] CC sysinfo.o CC gps.o gps.c: In function ‘osmo_gpsd_cb’: gps.c:73:2: error: too few arguments to function ‘gps_waiting’ /usr/include/gps.h:1435:13: note: declared here gps.c:77:2: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘gps_poll’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] gps.c: In function ‘osmo_gpsd_open’: gps.c:114:2: error: too few arguments to function ‘gps_open’ /usr/include/gps.h:1430:12: note: declared here make[3]: *** [gps.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/temal/dev/pkg/osmotemp/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src/common' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/temal/dev/pkg/osmotemp/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/temal/dev/pkg/osmotemp/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23' make: *** [host/layer23/layer23] Error 2

14 years

[PATCH] Updated GPS code so that it is compatible with new gpsd version.

by Konstantin Weitz

--- src/host/layer23/src/common/gps.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/host/layer23/src/common/gps.c $REPLACE$ index 38aae2c..ffdaa1a 100644 --- a/src/host/layer23/src/common/gps.c +++ b/src/host/layer23/src/common/gps.c @@ -70,11 +70,14 @@ int osmo_gpsd_cb(struct osmo_fd *bfd, unsigned int what) goto gps_not_ready; /* gps has no data */ - if (gps_waiting(gdata)) + + // 10 seconds timeout, only place where + // logic was changed to upgrade to new gpsd + if (gps_waiting(gdata,10000000)) goto gps_not_ready; /* polling returned an error */ - if (gps_poll(gdata)) + if (gps_read(gdata)) goto gps_not_ready; /* data are valid */ @@ -111,7 +114,9 @@ int osmo_gpsd_open(void) gps_bfd.when = BSC_FD_READ; gps_bfd.cb = osmo_gpsd_cb; - gdata = gps_open(g.gpsd_host, g.gpsd_port); + gdata = malloc(sizeof(struct gps_data_t)); + + gps_open(g.gpsd_host, g.gpsd_port, gdata); if (gdata == NULL) { LOGP(DGPS, LOGL_ERROR, "Can't connect to gpsd\n"); return -1; -- 1.7.5.2

14 years

libosmocore / logging from within libraries

by Harald Welte

Hi! As more and more code is moving into libraries (like I just did with the LAPDm code, and like pablo is working on with libosmo-abis), we needed a solution how to allocate and use the LOGP subsystem constants like DRSL, DRR, ... from within libraries. The existing logging code wasn't really prepared for that. I've now come um with a hack to extend it while preserving compatibility to applications: * we use negative numbers starting from -1 for library-internal subsystems * those numbers get converted to a positive index into the various arrays at run-time. So -1 ends up one entry higher in the array than the last application-providede log category/subsystem. As part of this change, the array allocations are now dynamic, i.e there is no maximum limit for the number of log categories that an application can register with the core. Only for libraries (even outside libosmocore), we have compile-time registration, i.e. the 'struct log_info_cat' and the D* constant need to be defined inside libosmocore. I think this is an acceptable compromise. Furthermore, if LOGP()/DEBUGP() ever see a subsystem number that it doesn't know, it will assign it to the new 'DLGLOBAL' (Debug Library GLOBAL) category, i.e. there cna be no array overflows. This ensures that even an external library using a 'newer' D* constant will not crash or otherwise fail, it will simply log in a slightly different way. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

14 years

help me i have motorola c123

by adel

hello i have Motorola c123 The following are my steps: 1- $ cd osmocom-bb $ git checkout -b testing remotes/origin/sylvain/testing fatal: git checkout: branch testing already exists 2- ~/osmocom-bb/src/host/osmocon$ ./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123xor ../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/layer1.compalram.bin got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 2f 00 /. got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 41 ....A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @ Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/layer1.compalram.bin): file_size=51320, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=51327 got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (16384/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (20480/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (24576/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (28672/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (32768/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (36864/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (40960/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (45056/51327) handle_write(): 4096 bytes (49152/51327) handle_write(): 2175 bytes (51327/51327) handle_write(): finished got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 03 . got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 42 B Received DOWNLOAD ACK from phone, your code is running now! OSMOCOM Layer 1 (revision osmocon_v0.0.0-786-g937023b) ====================================================================== Device ID code: 0xb4fb Device Version code: 0x0000 ARM ID code: 0xfff3 cDSP ID code: 0x0128 Die ID code: df0d1621a400d808 ====================================================================== REG_DPLL=0x2413 CNTL_ARM_CLK=0xf0a1 CNTL_CLK=0xff91 CNTL_RST=0xfff3 CNTL_ARM_DIV=0xfff9 ====================================================================== THIS FIRMWARE WAS COMPILED WITHOUT TX SUPPORT!!! Assert DSP into Reset Releasing DSP from Reset Setting some dsp_api.ndb values Setting API NDB parameters DSP Download Status: 0x0001 DSP API Version: 0x0000 0x0000 Finishing download phase DSP Download Status: 0x0002 DSP API Version: 0x3606 0x0000 LOST 1968! 3- ~/osmocom-bb/src/host/layer23/src/mobile$ ./mobile Copyright (C) 2008-2010 ... Contributions by ... License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. <000e> sim.c:1206 init SIM client <0005> gsm48_cc.c:61 init Call Control <0001> gsm48_rr.c:4944 init Radio Ressource process <0004> gsm48_mm.c:1220 init Mobility Management process <0004> gsm48_mm.c:971 Selecting PLMN SEARCH state, because no SIM. <0002> gsm322.c:3472 init PLMN process <0003> gsm322.c:3473 init Cell Selection process Mobile '1' initialized, please start phone now! VTY available on port 4247. <0004> subscriber.c:556 Requesting SIM file 0x2fe2 <000e> sim.c:209 got new job: SIM_JOB_READ_BINARY (handle=00000004) <000e> sim.c:697 go MF <000e> sim.c:241 SELECT (file=0x3f00) <000e> sim.c:187 sending APDU (class 0xa0, ins 0xa4) I wait and wait and nothing happens to keep as is? What is the solution to this problem? I hope someone can help me as soon as -- View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/help-me-i-have-motorola-c123-tp3… Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

14 years

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

baseband-devel June 2011