This is particularly useful if a layer23 app exists uncleanly; the next app would not be able to synchronize at all.

Signed-off-by: Alex Badea vamposdecampos@gmail.com ---

More to the point, I'd get stuck on the CBCH ;) I'm not sure if this would negatively impact other FULL reset use-cases, hence the RFC.

Thanks, Alex

src/target/firmware/layer1/l23_api.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/target/firmware/layer1/l23_api.c b/src/target/firmware/layer1/l23_api.c index 19838f1..82b86d7 100644 --- a/src/target/firmware/layer1/l23_api.c +++ b/src/target/firmware/layer1/l23_api.c @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ static void l1ctl_rx_reset_req(struct msgb *msg) switch (reset_req->type) { case L1CTL_RES_T_FULL: printf("L1CTL_RESET_REQ: FULL!\n"); + l1s.dedicated.type = GSM_DCHAN_NONE; l1s_reset(); l1s_reset_hw(); audio_set_enabled(0);