Hi,
We have been working on the handover feature in OsmocomBB and have managed to make some progress including SB/BSIC detection in dedicated mode which was not previously being successfully done in firmware. I wanted to share it and seek guidance on the last bit of handover implementation on which we are stuck. I hope someone would be able to help us or make use of our work.
We took code related to handover from the osmocom-bb jolly branch by manually adding/deleting stuff in the master branch as updating to the latest copy was giving us issues. We added code from the “Safely change TPU offset on TS change or sync change” commit till the “Use only sel_si for information about the current cell” commit. Using the handover code in the jolly branch and after making the changes explained below we were able to obtain the handover command from the BTS. The synchronized handover case works sometimes though still not every time, however the non-synchronized case doesn't work at all as we are not able to get the physical information command from the new cell. I'll explain the changes/additions we made to achieve this.
Firstly, we noted that in dedicated mode SB burst was not being detected. Changes were required at three main places in order to correctly perform FB/SB detection:
- It was seen that the results for SB were being read from DSP API location dsp_api.db_r->a_sch which is for the idle mode. The results had to be read from the dsp_api.ndb->a_sch26 location for the dedicated case if TCH_SB_DSP_TASK is used.
- After reading the FB we needed to update the quarter-bit offset of the TPU using the TOA of the FB to sync it with the start of frame of the neighbour cell in order to catch the SB (by changing the vaule of l1s.tpu_offset using the TOA of the FB).
- Frequency compensation needed to be performed using the afc_correct function before reading the SB.
* We actually kind of cheated a bit by adding 3 frames to the original idle frame in order to give us more time to perform FB/SB detection including the synchronizations mentioned above. This was because we weren't that proficient with the code and someone with more understanding could do this better. The call did not get dropped. We used the initial added “idle” frame to perform the quarter-bit and frequency compensation which was reversed in the idle frame with the response function to tune back to the serving cell.
These things, when added to the code did the trick and BSIC of the neighbours was obtained.
Once the BSICs were decoded the measurement report sent to the BTS became meaningful and the handover command was received. Upon receiving handover command, access bursts needed to be sent on the new channel which again was not currently being implemented properly as in order to tune to the new cell we needed to know its quarter-bit offset for start of frame, frequency compensation and absolute frame number which were not previously being obtained. Now that we were able to detect FB and SB these values were stored for the neighbours following detection of these bursts and were used to tune to a neighbour cell in case of a handover to it before the sending of access bursts. However, here is where we are stuck. We were expecting a physical information message following the access bursts but were not able to receive it due to which the handover failed. If only that could be achieved we believe handover should be successful.
Either we are not syncing properly to the new cell or we might not be following GSM protocol properly. We also might not be reading the FACCH properly for physical information message after tuning to the new cell as we couldn't really understand that bit very well. We wanted someone expertise on this matter and were hoping our work could be of use. We were more interested in getting the work done first up.
Best Regards,
M. Awais Aslam
Hi!
Great to see you working on this. Is your current work-in-progress code published somewhere? That would make it easier for people to comment on it.
Also, you can probably split out some patches/fixes and send them for review to gerrit already - see https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Gerrit for details.
Dear Max,
Hi, Sorry for being so late for replying to this email. The person who was working with us on the handover code had left and we were not in the position to upload the code at that time. I have uploaded the code now on gerrit for review. I hope we would get some help to complete the handover implementation in osmocombb.
Link to the uploaded code is: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/5490/
Regards
M. Awais
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Max msuraev@sysmocom.de wrote:
Hi!
Great to see you working on this. Is your current work-in-progress code published somewhere? That would make it easier for people to comment on it.
Also, you can probably split out some patches/fixes and send them for review to gerrit already - see https://osmocom.org/projects/ cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Gerrit for details.
-- Max Suraev msuraev@sysmocom.de http://www.sysmocom.de/ =======================================================================
- sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
- Alt-Moabit 93
- 10559 Berlin, Germany
- Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
- Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
Dear Muhammad,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:31:58PM +0500, Muhammad Awais Aslam wrote:
Hi, Sorry for being so late for replying to this email. The person who was working with us on the handover code had left and we were not in the position to upload the code at that time. I have uploaded the code now on gerrit for review. I hope we would get some help to complete the handover implementation in osmocombb.
Link to the uploaded code is: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/5490/
Thanks againf or your submission.
It's saddening me that you've been one of the few people substantially working on OsmocomBB in recent years, but yet the wider community is not able to benefit from your work, as the code review has stopped at its very early stage one year ago.
Open Source projects *only* exist because people take the effort of contributing to them. And contribution doesn't mean simply to put some code somewhere, but to work with the community and the maintainers to bring the code into merge-able form.
After more than one year has passed since your submission to gerrit, I would like to encourage you to take some time to clean the patches up and bring them into merge-able form.
Thanks again.
Kind regards, Harald
baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org