Sorry about that , darn gmail.....
Yes , nuttx seems pretty OK and it's author is very nice , a man to
work with. The problem would be that it's written by just one man and
I don't even know how it's doing on the GUI side.
Nuttx though seems more oriented towards micro controllers and and
targets with less resources.
As for nano-x it's one of the lightest GUIs around and I don't know if
there really are any better options for embedded open source graphics.
It's not really an X11 , not a full one anyway. And from what I've
heard you can get it to about 100 K which is certainly something in my
opinion.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Marius Cirsta <mforce2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes , nuttx seems pretty OK and it's author is
very nice , a man to
work with. The problem would be that it's written by just one man and
I don't even know how it's doing on the GUI side.
Nuttx though seems more oriented towards micro controllers and and
targets with less resources.
As for nano-x it's one of the lightest GUIs around and I don't know if
there really are any better options for embedded open source graphics.
It's not really an X11 , not a full one anyway. And from what I've
heard you can get it to about 100 K which is certainly something in my
opinion.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Alan Carvalho de Assis
<acassis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Harald,
On 4/18/11, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
I have never found the time to actually make that decision/selection,
so there is no status update.
I'd still like to have a say in the decision, but I'm welcome for the
discussion that has started right now and definitely like to look at
the proposals (like ethernut OS)
I think we could consider NuttX as well:
http://nuttx.sourceforge.net
This RTOS implements POSIX APIs and have many features "inherited" from Linux.
It is completely reconfigurable to fit small foot-print microcontrollers.
Just my 2 cents, I hope someone enjoy it.
Best Regards,
Alan