Hello,
Hopefully this question is appropriate on this list (please let me know otherwise).
Running ccch_scan or bcch_scan in the sylvain/burst_ind branch, I keep getting this error:
<000c> l1ctl.c:114 FBSB RESP: result=255
I tried checking the code, but I can't quite figure out what's going on. It looks like 255 is an error code, but I don't know where to go from there.
This may be related to my SIM card being locked (I think). Running mobile on the sylvain/testing branch, I get:
<0005> subscriber.c:625 PIN is required, 3 tries left
Will not having the PIN intefere with ccch_scan as well?
Thanks,
Josh Pereyda
Hi,
Running ccch_scan or bcch_scan in the sylvain/burst_ind branch, I keep getting this error:
bcch_scan doesn't make sense on burst_ind. Only ccch_scan is meant to do anything useful, all the other apps may do random things becaue they're not meant for use in burst_ind.
<000c> l1ctl.c:114 FBSB RESP: result=255
I tried checking the code, but I can't quite figure out what's going on. It looks like 255 is an error code, but I don't know where to go from there.
It just means failure to sync ...
Most likely the ARFCN you gave doesn't carry a valid C0.
Note that it's only tested on 900/1800. US band support is not tested and probably not functional especially in burst_ind. Fixing it is left as an exercise to the reader ...
This may be related to my SIM card being locked (I think). Running mobile on the sylvain/testing branch, I get:
<0005> subscriber.c:625 PIN is required, 3 tries left
Will not having the PIN intefere with ccch_scan as well?
No.
Cheers,
Sylvain
Sylvain,
Thanks for the prompt and helpful reply (much more prompt than this one). That clarified quite a bit.
<000c> l1ctl.c:114 FBSB RESP: result=255
I tried checking the code, but I can't quite figure out what's going on. It looks like 255 is an error code, but I don't know where to go from there.
It just means failure to sync ...
Most likely the ARFCN you gave doesn't carry a valid C0.
Note that it's only tested on 900/1800. US band support is not tested and probably not functional especially in burst_ind. Fixing it is left as an exercise to the reader ...
Haha, thanks. I tested it in 850 and scanned through channels 128 to 251 and was able to identify a Paging Channel (PCH) at 180, and some other stuff on some other channels. So ccch_scan appears to work in the 850 band; not sure about anything else or about 1900.
Thanks again, just replying to document the findings.
Josh
baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org