2 May
2011
2 May
'11
10:57 p.m.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Okay, understood that it is needed. Still, the discussion also showed that I seem to not have the proper knowledge of what is desired instead by those people hacking at layer 1 (what I don't do) :) Thus, may I suggest that I just remove the (static value) backlight setting in msgb.c to remove the calypso-dependency and leave a proper board_panic for someone else with a seperate patchset? To me, Harald's post indicates that it is a seperate topic?
ACK.
--
- Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)