2 May
2011
2 May
'11
10:57 p.m.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Okay, understood that it is needed. Still, the
discussion also showed that
I seem to not have the proper knowledge of what is desired instead by
those people hacking at layer 1 (what I don't do) :) Thus, may I suggest
that I just remove the (static value) backlight setting in msgb.c to
remove the calypso-dependency and leave a proper board_panic for someone
else with a seperate patchset? To me, Harald's post indicates that it is a
seperate topic?
ACK.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)