On 17. May 2017, at 22:08, Harald Welte
<laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
Hi Vadim,
Hey,
* remove 'talloc emulation' from osmocom-bb
and use pseudotalloc from
libosmocore.git (plus an embedded 'malloc' like umm_malloc)
Why do we need this hack (pseudotalloc)?
Because talloc is large both in terms of runtime memory overhead (for
each allocation) and in terms of code footprint,.
related to that. How confident are you we don't rely on the hierarchical
feature of talloc inside the libosmo* (or your more narrow list)? Maybe
we add some kind of runtime test/probe for that?
holger