17 May
2017
17 May
'17
5 p.m.
On 17. May 2017, at 22:08, Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org wrote:
Hi Vadim,
Hey,
- remove 'talloc emulation' from osmocom-bb and use pseudotalloc from
libosmocore.git (plus an embedded 'malloc' like umm_malloc)
Why do we need this hack (pseudotalloc)?
Because talloc is large both in terms of runtime memory overhead (for each allocation) and in terms of code footprint,.
related to that. How confident are you we don't rely on the hierarchical feature of talloc inside the libosmo* (or your more narrow list)? Maybe we add some kind of runtime test/probe for that?
holger