18 Jan
2011
18 Jan
'11
10:51 a.m.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:00:56PM +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
Obvious bits I would consider are:
- is this firmware compiled with TX support?
this could become a runtime feature as well? Would we set introduce a SET_FEAT_REQ?
it could - but I think just to make a point and avoid any accidents, I would like to keep an easy way how people can build (and use) firmware that will absolutely not transmit under any circumstance.
So I think it should remain a GET request for the time being,
--
- Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)