12 Dec
2011
12 Dec
'11
12:07 p.m.
Hi Scott,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:17:35PM +0200, Scott Weisman wrote:
I don't know if the previous discussion/decision regarding NuttX stands. This (limited) RTOS benchmark looked interesting to me:
I am not overly worried by that. From my point of view, aspects like the POSIX-style API and the general structure of the code have much more significance than absolute scheduler latency.
It would be great to see some work on getting more of our existing drivers for the calypso ported into NuttX.
Regards, Harald
--
- Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)