Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I was checking code given by you and tsm30 phone. header files are same.
Well, they aren't exactly the same, just very similar-looking. I have
not yet studied the diffs in detail. Yet is the operative word in the
previous sentence: as I've said before, my goal is to produce a code
version that works exactly like this Sotovik semi-src works on my Neo
Freerunner, but have it also work on my Pirelli DP-L10, and replace the
binary-only libs with reconstructed source pieces so I can make changes
like porting to the Pirelli and build with gcc.
When it comes to Layer1, in order to de-blob that part of our Leonardo
semi-src, I will need to lift L1 C files from either the TSM30 source
or the LoCosto one (probably some pieces from each), and then massage
them until they compile into code that matches what's in the current
binary objects. At that point I will need to become an expert on the
differences in the L1 code/headers between the different (semi-)source
leaks we are working with - but I am not at that point yet, I am still
working on reintegrating the lower layers of TI's software stack like
the BSP (aka "drivers", not DSP) initialization and the serial trace
mechanism.
> I just need to know what dsp patch needed.
Well, see, I don't know the answer to that question myself yet! But
your osmocon/layer1 output is telling me that the Calypso Lite chip in
your Compal phone has the same DSP ROM version (i.e., version 36) as
the 751992A in the Openmoko and the Pirelli, so whatever works for me
in that department should work for you as well.
In fact, I find it strange that any patches are needed at all for DSP
ROM version 36. The description of various DSP versions in TI's XML
configuration voodoo file g23m/system/busyb/unbusy_configset.xml
(inside the semi-src from Sotovik) reads:
<propertySet name="DSP" description="DSP code selection" shortName="SYS">
<valueDef value="1" valname="_fr" description="GSM 1.0: Full Rate" />
<valueDef value="2" valname="_fh" description="GSM 1.0: Full and Half Rate" />
<valueDef value="3" valname="_fe" description="GSM 1.0: Full and Enhanced Full Rate" />
<valueDef value="4" valname="_ac" description="GSM 1.0: All 3 Vocoder and Echo Cancellation" />
<valueDef value="6" valname="_al" description="GSM 1.0: All 3 Vocoder" />
<valueDef value="7" valname="_ad" description="GSM 1.0: All 3 Vocoder + Fax and Data" />
<valueDef value="9" valname="_2d" description="GSM 1.0: Full and Enhanced Full Rate plus Fax and Data" />
<valueDef value="16" valname="_16" description="GSM 1.5: All 3 Vocoder + Fax and Data - Vega+Omega - Ulysse rev B" />
<valueDef value="17" valname="_17" description="GSM 1.5: All 3 Vocoder + Fax and Data - Vega+Omega - Ulysse rev A" />
<valueDef value="30" valname="_30" description="GSM 1.5: All 3 Vocoder + CHED GPRS + Scheduler GPRS" />
<valueDef value="31" valname="_31" description="FIXME:???" />
<valueDef value="32" valname="_32" description="FIXME:???" />
<valueDef value="33" valname="_33" description="GPRS 1.5: All 3 Vocoder + CHED GPRS + Scheduler GPRS - Calypso" />
<valueDef value="34" valname="_34" description="GPRS 1.5: All 3 Vocoder + AMR + CHED GPRS + Scheduler GPRS - Calypso C035" />
<valueDef value="35" valname="_35" description="FIXME:???" />
<valueDef value="36" valname="_36" description="FR/HR/EFR/AMR, AEC, GPRS, SAM/CAL/CAL+ , OMEGA/IOTA/SYREN, Rework DSP34 (AMR, MELODY E2)" />
</propertySet>
So we see that GPRS first appeared in DSP version 30 (on some unknown
DBB chip before Calypso - maybe Samson?), then the early Calypso C05
chips had 33 in them (that's what the TSM30 apparently used - a very
early Calypso C05 rev A chip), then early Calypso C035 chips came out
with DSP version 34. The comments in l1_confg.h describe DSP 34 as
the first version with AMR. There are no informative comments for DSP
version 35, but I'm guessing that it was probably the version released
with the first Calypso+ chips.
But then look at the description for DSP version 36 quoted above: it
is explicitly described as supporting AMR in addition to the "regular"
voice codecs, 3 different DBB chips (Samson, Calypso and Calypso+),
and 3 different ABB chips: Omega, Iota and Syren. So I'm guessing
that the later fab runs of both Calypso C035 (what we have in our
current OsmocomBB-supported phones) and Calypso+ (that's the one with
the evil "secure" bootloader) were made with DSP code 36 instead of
34 or 35. And this DSP version 36 is described as a "rework" of DSP
34, whatever that means, with AMR and Melody E2 being mentioned
explicitly. Does "rework" mean bugfixes?
Thus it sounds from the description that DSP 36 is supposed to have
all of the bugs already fixed in it so that AMR ought to work out of
the box. Yet the TCS211/Leonardo code we've got from Sotovik does
apply a whole bunch of patches to the DSP code, and these patches are
definitely made specifically against DSP ROM code 36. And your
observation on your C118 that the DSP sends out good uplink when
configured for AMR, but puts out garbage on the voice downlink path
also suggests that our DSP ROM 36 still has buggy AMR support in it.
We will most likely find the correct answer when my FreeCalypso
project advances to the point where I have a de-blobbed version of
this newly found TCS211 code running on my Openmoko and Pirelli
phones. Hopefully this de-blobbed version that applies all of the
same DSP patches as the original will have AMR that "just works" - in
that case we can then disable the patches one by one until we find the
critical one whose presence or absence differentiates between AMR
working or not.
If you don't want to wait for me to get to that point, feel free to
beat me to it. You can buy a Neo Freerunner from www.pulster.eu if
you don't have one already, then flash my leo2moko port into it, and
confirm that AMR works. Then you can try disabling some or all of the
DSP patches (you should be able to do that with some minor surgery on
the existing blobs, without going through the slow and painstaking
de-blobbing/reconstruction process I'm doing for FreeCalypso) and
thereby find out which DSP patch (if any) is required for AMR to work
properly.
Or you could try extracting all of the DSP patches from this TCS211
semi-src (see my first reply to you in this thread for the links to
the extracted objects and the needed GNU Binutils patch), have your
experimental OsmocomBB/AMR code apply all of them in the same order as
the semi-closed firmware does (again, do a bit of disassembly with
objdump to find what this correct order is), and see if the
application of all of these patches makes AMR work for you.
VLR,
SF
Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Harald and Dieter Spaar
You should consider the possibility of accepting help from more than
just them...
> my question is does tsm30 support AMR operation
Do you have an actual physical TSM30 phone? If you do, you must be
the luckiest person on Earth, as these phones must be worth way more
than their weight in gold. If you don't have an actual TSM30, why
does it matter whether it supports AMR or not?
IOW, it seems to me that you are posing the question the wrong way:
rather than ask whether TSM30 supported AMR or not, you should be
asking how to get AMR support working on your current phone, which I
presume is one of the models supported by OsmocomBB, all of which use
a much newer Calypso+ABB+RF chipset than what the TSM30 had in it.
So, if you want to get help from those people who actually *are*
willing to help you (such as me), please answer the following two
questions:
1. Which phone are you using for your OsmocomBB/AMR experiments?
2. Please show us the console output you get from osmocon/layer1; I
want to see the "DSP API Version:" line in particular, which should be
printed twice.
My hypothesis is that getting AMR to work probably requires applying
at least one patch to the DSP code (others here have posted the same),
but before we can proceed further down that road, we need to know
which phone you are using and which DSP ROM version it has - hence my
two questions above; please answer them.
VLR,
SF
Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using TSM30 code for reference.
I assume you meant "I am using the TSM30 source as a reference for
what the ARM part of the Calypso should do" - which still doesn't
answer my question as to what you are doing as far as code running in
the Calypso DSP.
The TSM30 source targets a very old version of the Calypso chip (C05
rev A) that has DSP code version 33 in its ROM. The PD751992A version
of the Calypso that appears in the phones supported by OsmocomBB (at
least in the Openmoko and Pirelli ones, dunno about Compal as I don't
have any of the latter) seems to have DSP code version 36 in its ROM;
I say so based on this line in the osmocon/layer1 console output from
my Pirelli DP-L10:
DSP API Version: 0x3606 0x0000
The version of Layer1 code included in the TSM30 source contains
support for DSP versions up to 35, but not 36. Supposedly versions 34
and 35 (original Calypso C035 and Calypso+, respectively) can do AMR,
although probably with some patches required, but DSP 33 can't do AMR
at all, from what I understand. So it appears to me that the TSM30
source as a whole does not support the AMR codec (at least for calls;
there seems to be some support for AMR voice memos implemented in the
TSM30's separate TMS320DA250 processor), hence whatever AMR support
may be present in various individual components (bits of code which
Purple Labs got from TI) is likely to be incomplete or buggy or not
properly integrated etc.
FWIW, the TSM30 source includes DSP patches that are meant to be
applied atop DSP ROM versions 33, 34 and 35. But I doubt that any of
these patch versions would apply atop DSP ROM 36 in a working manner.
But the new Sotovik firmware semi-src (see my previous post) does
target the right version of the Calypso/Iota/Rita chipset (same as in
my Pirelli DP-L10 and Openmoko GTA02), and it is built for DSP version
36 - so it makes a much better reference version than TSM30. And it
does contain DSP patch files with "36_10" in the filenames. It is
unfortunate that this properly-matching version is not full-src like
TSM30, but only a semi-src, i.e., many of the important modules are in
object form only. But they are linkable/relocatable objects with full
symbolic info, so examining them with objdump (again, see my previous
post for the Binutils patch to support TI's variant of COFF) yields
quite a bit of useful insight.
This Sotovik firmware compiles into a functioning image, and with a
little bit of work I was able to get it to run on my Om GTA02:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2013-October/069010.html
I was able to get this fw to work on the GTA02 keeping all of the
object blobs as they are because the GTA02 happens to use the same
TSPACT signal arrangement for its tri-band RFFE as the Russian cell
modem for which we got the fw semi-src, which is in turn based on TI's
Leonardo+ quad-band reference design with minimal changes. My next
step is to get this code to run on my Pirelli DP-L10 - it's also
tri-band, but the TSPACT signal arrangement is gratuitously different.
Thus before I can get the code to run on my Pirelli, I need to replace
the object blobs with something that I can compile conditionally for
CONFIG_TARGET_GTAMODEM vs. CONFIG_TARGET_PIRELLI. I am working on
that in my FreeCalypso project, but I'm currently pretty far from
approaching L1 - still working on the lower BSP layers.
If you want to get to the bottom of the AMR support mystery, my
recommendation would be to start with this known-working version which
targets our hardware (either do it on an Openmoko phone, or wait for
me to de-blob the code to make it work on the Pirelli too, or beat me
to it) - I am reasonably sure that this version has working AMR - and
then experiment from there. It appears that the code as it stands
(i.e., the current set of object blobs) applies a whole bunch of
different patches to the DSP code. You could try omitting these
patches and testing if AMR still works or if it breaks. (Or perhaps
some other things will stop working without the patches - you'll get
to find out!) If AMR works with the original full set of patches but
doesn't work when no patches are applied, you can then bisect to
determine which of the several patches is the critical one...
VLR,
SF
Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I am trying to implement AMR codec for osmocom-bb.
Doesn't AMR support require applying some DSP code patches?
Locating the DSP patch bits within a binary fw image read out of C1xx
or whatever would probably be an incredible pain, but you can use this
source/object mixed version instead:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/TI_src/Sotovik/
If you download ti-libs-extract.tar.bz2 from the above, you'll find
all DSP patches in various *.obj modules in the l1_ext subdirectory
inside that tarball. The names of the little individual object modules
in that bunch are quite descriptive. The object format is TI's variant
of COFF; you will need this patch to GNU Binutils in order to grok
these objects:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/embedded/ti-arm/
Enjoy!
Viva la Revolucion,
SF
Hello folks
I am trying to implement AMR codec for osmocom-bb. I got assignment commend
which is same as
T_AMR_CONFIGURATION amr_param;
amr_param.noise_suppression_bit=0;
amr_param.initial_codec_mode_indicator=1;
amr_param.initial_codec_mode=0;
amr_param.active_codec_set=0x95;
amr_param.threshold[0]=0x0a;
amr_param.threshold[1]=0x10;
amr_param.threshold[2]=0x18;
amr_param.threshold[3]=0x24;------------just random value
amr_param.hysteresis[0]=0x04;
amr_param.hysteresis[1]=0x04;
amr_param.hysteresis[2]=0x04;
amr_param.hysteresis[3]=0x04;----------just copied value from rest
config for hysteresis
l1ddsp_load_amr_param( amr_param);
Now when i make a call I here gliches or random noise. also after some
time there is radio signal loss and call is dropped.
I am not getting why this is happening.
--
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed(a)gmail.com
akibsayyed(a)matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
Hi,
I am trying to modify osmocomBB to work without the phone as layer 1.
My goal is that application will using socket to communicate with BTS
(modified BTS which can send and receive message throught sockets).
I analyzed the osmocomBB code and I found that I'll have to modify
osmocon.c (host/osmocon/osmocon.c) file. This file is interface between
serial communication and layer2. If I am right, I have to do this changes:
1. Delete functions handle the serial interface
2. Add new tool server to dnload structure
3. Creating new tool server for L1 interface (UNIX socket or IP socket
with GSMTAP)
4. Add callback function for reading from layer2 socket and forward
this messages to L1 socket interface.
Simplified I have to listen and forward packets from BTS to layer2
socket and from L2 to L1.
Do I think in right direction or I am wrong and it will need more
modifications?
Best regards,
Miroslav Babjak
Hi, all.
I am a newer to the osmocomBB project. And i was trying to load the firmware
to my C118 phone using CP210X converter. But after i input the command
below:
/.*/osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123xor
../../target/firmware/board/PHONE_TYPE/FIRMWARE.compalram.bin*/
i can only get some reponse shown in the terminal like this:
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f8 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: e0 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 20
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
It was pretty different from the instruction in the osmocomBB website as i
did not get the below messages:
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin):
file_size=13404, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=13411
so, i was confused if i have something wrong? can anyone help me with this?
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/I-have-a-problem-when-load-the-f…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
Please forgive me for the off-topic post. My cell service is so bad at
the house I can't hold it in any longer.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a repeater of the Sprint
network? I'd like a low power omni for the house, and a directional
back to the tower. (Or some step-by-step instructions for building
one?)
I'm less interested in a Femtocell because I have about an acre of
land, and I'd like to get some coverage in the back yard too.
For completeness, I have an iPhone and EVO 4G. So I would like 800
ESMR, 1900 PCS, and 2500 WiMax, if possible.
Thanks in advance and sorry about wandering a bit.
As I wrote here two months ago, I am seeking to build my own totally
free, end-user-usable Calypso-based quad-band GSM plain phone, as well
as possibly a Calypso-based free GSM modem module for smartphone
projects done by others, such as this:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1376708
I already have the Calypso etc chips in qty 100 sitting in my desk
drawer - buying them on the Chinese surplus market turned out to be
surprisingly easy, and they most definitely have quite a bit more of
them available than the 100 I have bought.
Making my GSM device(s) quad-band as in 850/900/1800/1900 MHz is an
important part of my goal - contrast with the current OsmocomBB-
supported devices, which are only dual-band or tri-band at best. My
belief in the idea that our familiar Calypso/Iota/Rita chipset is
capable of supporting the quad-band configuration stems from the
existence of this TI reference design:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/Leonardo_plus_RD122.pdfftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/Leonardo_plus_quadband_schem.pdfftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/M034F.pdf
The first PDF is something I just found on 52rd.com 2 days ago: it has
the Leonardo+ quad-band schematics plus a component placement drawing.
The 2nd PDF is the schematic which we have had for 2y now (might be a
very slightly different version, haven't visually diffed the two
closely enough) and the last PDF is for the quad-band RF FEM they used,
all from 52rd.com.
What I am still missing is a copy of the PCB layout (in whatever format
TI used for their reference designs all those years ago) corresponding
to those schematics. I have not yet found that article in my trawls
through 52rd.com - that's a search for a needle in a giant haystack.
(We also have a Leonardo_rev05.dsn file, in the same directory as the
ones listed above, but I assume it's the EDA source file for the
schematic capture phase only, no layout.)
I have already found a layout for a dual-band phone on an 8-layer PCB:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/PCB/unknown-phone-pcb1.zip
and I can probably find a layout for a tri-band phone on an 8-layer
PCB too, something like Pirelli DP-L10. In contrast, Leonardo+ is a
very elegant quad-band design, and this TI doc says it's only a
6-layer PCB:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/chipsets+refdesigns.pdf
(see page 10)
We also have this:
http://scottn.us/downloads/peek/HW%20doc/I-Sample%20ref.%20design/Full%20pa…
I-sample is TI's LoCosto board, and it is quad-band. But LoCosto's
built-in RF block has separate LNA inputs for 850 and 900 MHz unlike
Rita, and I-sample uses a weird arrangement: the PA and the antenna
switch are integrated into one, but the Rx SAW filters are discrete.
So it isn't the same as Leonardo+.
Thus I am putting out this loud call for anyone who may have found a
copy of the Leonardo+ PCB layout somewhere on 52rd.com or some other
site of a similar nature. If you have a copy of this PCB layout or
know of a place where it can be downloaded, please speak up!
By helping me obtain a copy of that PCB layout, you would be helping
not only me, but also all those end users who would appreciate having
a quad-band GSM plain phone (or a modem for Neo900 etc) that is fully
documented and capable of running 100% free baseband firmware.
TIA,
SF
Hi list,
Sometimes when I run ./mobile -i 127.0.0.1, after output as below
-------excerpt----------------
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2174 PAGING REQUEST 1
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2132 TMSI ***** (not for us)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2450 IMMEDIATE ASSIGNMENT:
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2462 (ta 30/16615m ra 0x7f chan_nr 0x0e MAIO 0 HSN 38 TS 6 SS 0 TSC 4)
<0001> gsm48_rr.c:2478 Not for us, no request.
<000b> gsm48_rr.c:2174 PAGING REQUEST 1
-----execerpt-end----------------------------------
I then want to launch ccch_scan,
after calling the function l1ctl_tx_fbsb_req,with the from mobile obtained parameters, similar to what Bhaskar did here:
http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2013-February/003799.html
But how and from where did Bhaskar call l1ctl_tx_fbsb_req function? Via netcat or socat to the osmocom-socket?
Regards erich
