Andreas said he is OK with applying them, so I will do that.
>
> OK :)
> However, if I read your code correctly, it still seems to me that there is
> a fixed compile time decision if gpsd or built-in gps support is to be
> used.
>
> I think it would be better to keep it a runtime decision, i.e.
>
> 1) if gpsd headers/library available during compilation,
> build support for _both_ gpsd and built-in gps into the program,
> 2) if they are not available, only include the built-in gps support.
>
> That's easy to do. I can maintain the original gps interface, so old code
doesn't need to be fixed, and choose the support to use from an internal
state.
> The decision which method to use should be a config file option. Please
> make
> sure that a config file configured for built-in gps support will work with
> both
> versions of the program.
>
> A config file requesting the use of gpsd support should make the program
> abort if it was compiled without gpsd support included.
>
> Not sure to agree. Execs from layer23/misc don't rely on config files.
Probably that's due to the low number of switches used. I think that, even
if cell_log options are increased, we can still use cmd switches. Do you
agree?
Ciao
Dario.
Hi all,
I would like to propose moving the config file into something like ~/.osmocom/
and not put it in a system wide directory. The path in /etc/ is the only
part of OsmocomBB that requires root privileges, and I don't really think
that in a case of multiple users you would want to e.g. share stuff like
the IMSI / Ki anyway.
What do you think?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
the GSM bts Features =GSM phone
we can use usb interface phone to do a same Features GSM bts
we can use motorola c375 c450 c550 and MTK chip phone all use interface phone
this is a cheap Program
can you tell me the osmocom feature isnt same we can use openbts software Connection the phone
Hello,
I have the problem connecting to the phone with osmocom tool. For what I
have read on this list trying to run helloworld example app should work, and
if there are problems connecting they stem from the cable/adapter being low
quality.
For now I have tried with three different usb-rs232 adapters (2 on
winchiphead ch341 chip then I switched to prolific PL-2303 chip) and with 3
different phones (1xC155 and 2xC121) but in any of those configs I am not
able to successfully run helloworld - it doesn't receive 'prompt' message as
written in wiki - CompalRamLoader. Instead for C121 I always get:
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/hello_world.compalram.bin
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 7e ~
got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 82 bf 7d fd 7f ..}..
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 51 Q
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: d2 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 51 Q
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 0a .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 3a :
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: a3 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: a3 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: da .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
I tried to stty different port speeds but still only got above sequence.
Have you got any suggestion what could be the problem or what direction
should I follow to get it working?
Hello.
I'm trying to send a location update message using IMSI, but I never receive
a reply from the BSC (Authentication request, identity request or location
reject).
If I change the location update identity using a TMSI, then I receive an
Authentication Request or an Identity Request.
Could be the IMSI format worng? The used IMSI is valid. I copy the string
containing this one into the subscriber imsi field.
Should I use an encoding function?
I hope the issue is clear.
Thanks in advance for support.
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/IMSI-format-tp2576369p2576369.ht…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.