18 Oct
2023
18 Oct
'23
7:40 p.m.
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:12:44 +0200 Harald Welte wrote:
If we were to propose again, setting aside considerations specific to Intel, I believe, considering the users of ethtool, the smallest units should be gtpu4|6 and gtpc4|6.
agreed. Though I'm not entirely sure one would usually want to treat v4 different from v6. I'd assume they would usually both follow the same RSS scheme?
FWIW I had the same thought. But if we do add flow matching support for GTP one day we'll have to define a struct like struct ethtool_tcpip4_spec, which means size of the address matters?