On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:12:44 +0200 Harald Welte wrote:
If we were to
propose again, setting aside considerations specific to
Intel, I believe, considering the users of ethtool, the smallest units
should be gtpu4|6 and gtpc4|6.
agreed. Though I'm not entirely sure one would usually want to treat v4
different from v6. I'd assume they would usually both follow the same
RSS scheme?
FWIW I had the same thought. But if we do add flow matching
support for GTP one day we'll have to define a struct like
struct ethtool_tcpip4_spec, which means size of the address
matters?