> On 12 Dec 2016, at 18:13, ak-74*** ... <87078838964(a)mail.ru> wrote:
>
> root@osmocombb-VirtualBox:~# osmo-nitb -c ~/.osmocom/open-bsc.cfg -l ~/.osmocom/hlr.sqlite3 -P -C —debug=DRLL:DCC:DMM:DRR:DRSL:DNM
>
> DB: Failed to init database. Please check the option settings.
>
if you look at the debian/control libdbd-sqlite3 needs to be installed to run osmo-nitb. Did you install that?
holger
https://youtu.be/YJ_qkJEFNcg
UGS is a portable system designed to send SMS messages and data to GSM
phones in a pre-defined area.
Unlike existed advertisement systems
UGS sends normal or flash SMS instead of broadcast messages (receipt of
broadcast messages can be disabled by mobile phone user);
UGS is an independent stand-alone system, which does not require any
cooperation with cellular operators.
UGS does not use phone numbers of mobile phones, hence there is no need in
the lists of phone numbers to be obtained from various sources. Those lists
are often not complete, outdated, irrelevant and costly.
The UGS can be used for commercial or security purposes:
Send commercial advertisements, announcements, free gift coupons, useful
information or welcome messages in specific places: shopping areas, banks,
restaurants, train or bus stations, exhibitions, shows, etc.
Send warning messages or requests to the people in the case of emergency.
Send messages with the request to contact police to potential crime
witnesses in the crime areas.
SMS messages can be sent:
To New in the Area or
To Known in the Area or
To pre-defined groups or
To everyone,
The UGS can be installed in a fixed location or carried to the places of
need in a small, hand carry suitcase.
Potential users of the system are small stores, large organizations,
advertisement providers, rescue services, police forces and others.
System can be operated locally or remotely via the Internet.
SMS sent by the system are free of charge; neither owner of the system nor
mobile phone users pay for them.
The system is comprised of compact Base Station Unit and notebook computer.
Because of unique sophisticated algorithm implemented in the system, the UGS
transmits very low power and does not interfere with existed GSM networks.
User can define any phone number or name of the sender, which will appear on
the screens of mobile phones.
Main specifications:
Frequency coverage: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz
Number of SMS: No limitations
Number of handsets: No limitations
System output: From 10mW up to 10w (adjustable)
Power: 220V / 110V / 24V / 12-16V or Batteries
Operation Range: 10...1500 m
SMS language: All languages
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/USRP-Free-BULK-SMS-SMS-device-tp…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dear Osmocom Community,
[please respect the Reply-To and post all follow-up discussion to this
to openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org, so we avoid having long threads
cross-posted to several mailing lists.]
>From 2012 to 2016 we were running a series of small, invitation-only
Osmocom Developer Conferences. Access was intentionally restricted
to those community members who have demonstrated an existing track
record of contribution to any of the projects under the Osmocom
umbrella.
This format of a small, tightly knit group of about 20 people has been
successful over the years, and I have received a lot of positive
feedback from past participants.
On the other hand, the Osmocom project has grown in scope and diversity,
and some of those projects don't have all that much relationship to each
other - except being started by people from within the same group.
There's the cellular communications (GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS and hopefully at
some point LTE) protocols which is attracting a lot of professional
users. And then there's pure community projects like rtl-sdr,
OsmocomBB, OsmocomGMR and many other efforts.
Particularly the cellular infrastructure projects (OsmoBTS, OsmoPCU,
OsmoBTS, OsmoNITB, OsmoSGSN, OpenGGSN, OsmoIuh & co) are somehow
"standing out" of the othe projects in the context of having a wider
user bsae, and in that user base also primarily commercial users.
So I'd like to start a discussion on how to possibly change the event
format to accomodate the various interests and parties. I definitely
don't want to loose the "annual meeting of old friends" atmosphere,
while at the same time also opening up to other interested parties.
One idea would be to keep OsmoDevCon as-is and have a separate event
where non-contributing/developing users / sysadmins / system integrators
could also be attending.
Another idea would be to split into a 'user day' and 'developer days'
format. This is something the netfilter developer workshops have been
using for many years, and from my limited insight quite successfully so.
The "user day" is more like a traditional tech conference, with a large
auditorium and talks oriented towards users / sysadmins / integrators of
the software. The "developer days" are the invitation-only part, for
known contributing developers only, similar to what we have at
OsmoDevCon.
Having both events (or both parts of an event) back-to-back has the
advantage that a large number of potential speakers for the 'user day'
are already present, and they don't have to travel yet another time.
One could even structure it further and say we have one user day, one
public 'Osmocom cellular developer day' and then the closed 'OsmoDevCon
classic', maybe reduced from 4 days to 3 or even 2 days only?
What is the general opinion about this?
Are there people lurking on this list who would be interested in
attending a public 'user day' or even 'developer day' about the Osmocom
cellular projects, with presentations and workshops around topics such
as running Osmocom based cellular networks?
In terms of when/where, I would suggest to keep the tradition of April
in Berlin/Germany. But I'm of course very happy if somebody wants to
host it some place else...
Regards, and looking forward to meeting you [again] in 2017,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hey there, I bumped into this error when testing gprsdecode from srldabs.de When I try the sample .dat files provided from srlabs.de it works fine though. Any hints?
Kind Regards
George AndguladzeSenior Software EngineerBusiness Management Technology
www.bmt.ge
Hi,
I didn’t find anything useful yet. Everything seems normal during the IMSI attach procedure (location updating request, authentication request/response, identity request/response …), I can call and send SMS normally but the phone doesn’t get paged in any way. It seems strange that no differences can be seen during the IMSI attach procedure while some sim cards do not work.
On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Dennis Eisenbarth <dennis.eisenbarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> GSM specs, it is.
>
> On 04.03.2016 17:32, robert wrote:
>>
>> I read about sim card types since it must be a sim card problem but I didn’t find anything useful.
>>
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Dennis Eisenbarth <dennis.eisenbarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A good start would be a look into the specifications.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04.03.2016 14:31, robert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I tried two sim cards one that works fine and another one that doesn’t get paged, I noticed that during the location update procedure everything is exactly the same (using wireshark). The log files are also similar. Although both cards work fine if used in a normal phone (even with a motorola c123/118 …).
>>>>
>>>> Another thing to mention is that some sim cards only work when i stick them on a BTS that has the "SI type 3, GPRS indicator" as follows:
>>>> "3G Early Classmark Sending Restriction: Neither UTRAN, CDMA2000 nor GERAN IU MODE CLASSMARK CHANGE message shall be sent with the Early classmark sending"
>>>> while they can only make calls without being able to receive anything on other BTS where the "SI type 3, GPRS indicator" is as follows:
>>>> "3G Early Classmark Sending Restriction: The sending of UTRAN,CDMA2000 and GERAN IU MODE CLASSMARK CHANGE messages are controlled by the Early Classmark Sending Control parameter"
>>>> I would be very grateful if anyone has some explanations to what is going on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Robert,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Tomcsányi Domonkos <domi(a)tomcsanyi.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would help us out a lot if you could provide at least one complete log file from the output of the mobile app, so we can start having some ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Domi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016. jan. 26. dátummal, 17:24 időpontban robert steve <robert.steve07(a)gmail.com> írta:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I would first like to thank all those who participated in this nice project.
>>>>>> I recently started working with osmocombb and was able to have it working fine on a motorola c118.
>>>>>> However, I noticed that some sim cards can connect normally to the BTS, can make calls and send SMS but can’t receive anything. They simply don't get paged. While for some other sim cards everything seems to be working fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know what might be causing this issue ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Hello baseband hacking folks,
I have heard several people complain that they are no longer able to
find/obtain a Motorola C1xx phone or any other Calypso device for
playing with OsmocomBB. I assume these complaints probably come from
people in the EU and other 900/1800 MHz regions, as US band C139 phones
are still readily available on ebay (63 listings as of right now, all
dirt cheap), but either way, I have what I believe to be the proper
solution to the shortage and the crippled nature of all pre-existing
Calypso devices: a new Calypso board.
Back in 2012 Harald Welte posted here saying that his company was
going to be making a new Calypso board for the very same purpose of
addressing the shortage and the deficiencies of pre-existing devices,
but as far as I know, no such product has ever been produced - nor do
I know if whoever was behind that project even got as far as creating
the design for it.
Fast-forwarding to the present, we now have a ready-to-build design
for a Calypso development board called FCDEV3B, which stands for
FreeCalypso development board, triband. It is based on a reuse of the
known-working Calypso modem design from Openmoko, reuse at the level
of physical PCB layout, based on the GTA02 design files which Openmoko
founder Mr. Sean Moss-Pultz released in April of 2015 at my urging.
Back in 2012 Harald was saying that he was only going to release PDF
schematics but not the full design files for his board; I feel
differently about such matters, hence the complete design files for
*my* board are free to the world:
ftp://ftp.freecalypso.org/pub/GSM/FreeCalypso/fcdev3b/
Now we need to get these boards physically made, and toward that end I
have started a crowdfunding campaign:
https://www.gofundme.com/fcdev3b-board-production-2umevjw
In the interest of transparency, I have to disclose (most people know
it already, but I have to state it anyway) that I do not use OsmocomBB
and will never contribute to Osmocom software because I am working on
my own personally preferred alternative GSM MS firmware implementation,
but when it comes to the hardware I seek to build and offer to the
community, there is no reason why it won't work with OsmocomBB - it
should work just fine.
Because my board is a derivative of Openmoko's modem design and the
part that is different between Openmoko's board and mine (the flash
chip - I will populate a higher-capacity chip on the same footprint)
is not used by OsmocomBB software, the images currently built in
board/gta0x/*.highram.bin should work as-is on my FCDEV3B without
needing any code changes.
Hasta la Victoria, Siempre,
M~
Yes, my plan was:
- get osmocom-bb (layer1/rssi) firmware working (without graphics probably)
- use that work side-by-side to integrate into fernvale nuttx
- create a layer1 "app" in nuttx
- port "mobile" app to nuttx
With the goal being that you can call/text from the nuttx shell.
I have the following hardware with which to experiment:
- c139 motorola phones
- pirelli phone
- a few other calypso phones
- seeedstudio rephone (mtk6261)
- sim800 of various types
- several watch phones (dz09 gt08 v9, both 6260 and 6261)
- raw 6260 chips which I hope to design a custom pcb for
My end goal which is far too ambitious is to make a rock-like device which has no ports/holes:
- bluetooth serial to nuttx shell
- qi wireless charging
- accelerometer gestures for basic controls
- bone conducting speaker
- speech synth (sam/espeak) and voice recognition (pocketsphinx)
- all source is included on-device, even to the point that I would like to port all this work to a forth-like language of my own invention so you can debug, learn and experiment on the device
I have so far fixed up the existing mtk-firmware target and was debating whether to submit that small patch or wait until I get some 626x work done. On that front I have the basic registers and an initial BSI power on routine written (but not tested).
Thanks to all the giants upon whose shoulders I stand to do this work,
Craig
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 10/13/16, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: nuttx-bb layout? inside or outside nuttx?
To: "Craig Comstock" <craig_comstock(a)yahoo.com>
Cc: "Marcin Mielczarczyk" <marcin.mielczarczyk(a)gmail.com>, "baseband-devel" <baseband-devel(a)lists.osmocom.org>
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2016, 2:09 AM
Hi Craig,
this is just a small note that
I just met Marcin Mielczarczyk (who did
the
existing but still incomplete MTK support work a few years
back) at
Embedded Linux Conf Europe, and
informed him about your work.
It is really exciting for both of us to see
somebody picking this up and
trying to bring
things together.
If I'm
not mistaken, you basically have the following agenda:
* Structure OsmocomBB in a way
that it can be built 'side-by-side into Nuttx
* Build /integrate it from the
fernvale nuttx port that is available
* Implement the bulk of the MTK L1 integration,
i.e. the interface to
the DSP.
And afterwards hope that you
have something that supports either the
Fernvale, SIM800H, Linkit One, or other MTK 2G
baseband chips out there.
Please let me know this was an accurate
understanding.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a
desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
osmocombb+c118 gsm-sniffer:
youtube:
https://youtu.be/ZDToZIYHmJM
blog:
http://gsmsuperben.blogspot.my/2016/07/osmocombbc118-gsm-sniffer.html
System :
ubuntu12.04-i386(or kali)
一:update system
update(or vi /etc/apt/sources.list )
settings
Inside find software update source download from modifying their own country
Then save the exit
now open terminal
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get upgrade
二:Then install a series of dependency
$ sudo apt-get install libusb-0.1-4 libpcsclite1 libccid pcscd
$ sudo apt-get install libtool shtool autoconf git-core pkg-config make gcc
build-essential libgmp3-dev libmpfr-dev libx11-6 libx11-dev texinfo flex
bison libncurses5 libncurses5-dbg libncurses5-dev libncursesw5
libncursesw5-dbg libncursesw5-dev zlibc zlib1g-dev libmpfr4 libmpc-dev
libpcsclite-dev
(copy)
三:Create several directories , download ARM compiler
$ mkdir osmocombb
$ cd osmocombb
$ mkdir build install src
$ cd src
$ wget ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/newlib-1.19.0.tar.gz
四:install gnu-arm-build.3.sh
$ cd ..
$ chmod +x gnu-arm-build.3.sh
$ ./gnu-arm-build.3.sh
See here you can directly enter
五:After you install the add environment
$ cd install/bin
$ pwd
$ vi ~/./. bashrc
export PATH=$PATH:/osmocombb/ install/bin
$ source ~/.bashrc
六:Download and compile osmocomBB
back osmocombb download osmocom
$ git clone git://git.osmocom.org/libosmocore.git
$ git clone git://git.osmocom.org/osmocom-bb.git
When installing libosmocore execute ./configure many people will encounter
No package 'talloc' found such a mistake , because they can not talloc, Here
is the solution
$ wget https://www.samba.org/ftp/talloc/talloc-2.1.7.tar.gz
$ tar -zxvf talloc-2.1.7.tar.gz
$ cd talloc-2.1.7/
$ ./configure
$ make
$ sudo make install
install libosmocore
$ cd libosmocore/
$ autoreconf -i
$ ./configure
$ make
$ sudo make install $ cd ..
Compile osmocombb
$ cd osmocom-bb
$ git checkout --track origin/luca/gsmmap
$ cd src
$ make
七:Modify the problem file ( if you are gnu-arm-build.2.sh and no cell
scanning immobile problem , skip this step )
Enter osmocom-bb find these files and modify them
vi osmocom-bb/ src/target/firmware/board/compal/highram.lds
vi osmocom-bb/ src/target/firmware/board/compal/ram.lds
vi osmocom-bb/ src/target/firmware/board/compal_e88/flash.lds
vi osmocom-bb/ src/target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.lds
vi osmocom-bb/ src/target/firmware/board/mediatek/ram.lds
Found inside this string of code
KEEP(*(SORT(.ctors)))
In the following is added
KEEP(*(SORT(.init_array)))
Listed as:
To save , all changes well in entering osmocom-bb / src recompile
$ make -e CROSS_TOOL_PREFIX=arm-none-eabi-
八:Insert your brush into the firmware 118
in osmocom-bb directory
$ cd src/host/osmocon
$ sudo ./osmocon -m c123xor -p /dev/ttyUSB0
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/layer1.compalram.bin
Enter appear so wait when you click c118 power button , click on it
If this is the brush into failure , look at your c118 cable, if you are
buying a new phone line proposed to insert a little tight . . Best to shell
removed
九:Scanning station information
Open a new terminal or in osmocom-bb directory
$ cd src/host/layer23/src/misc
$ sudo ./cell_log -O
Then enter
$ sudo ./ccch_scan -i 127.0.0.1 -a ARFCN
ARFCN is circled out above that value , such as column
$ sudo ./ccch_scan -i 127.0.0.1 -a 59
十:install wireshark
Open a new terminal
$ sudo apt-get install wireshark
$ sudo wireshark -k -i lo -f 'port 4729'
In the filter input gsm_sms Then quietly wait for it。。。
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/smocombb-c118-gsm-sniffer-tp4026…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have fernvale-nuttx running on a couple of MTK6260-based watch phones and plan on working on porting layer1 to these devices.
https://www.kosagi.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=407
I saw the most recent activity on nuttx-bb seems to be http://cgit.osmocom.org/nuttx-bb/log/?h=gnutoo/layer1-2015-wip
wondering if anyone else is working on this elsewhere that we can coordinate?
If there are any particular suggestions/hints/warnings please chime in so I make better progress and have less trouble when I submit pull requests and such.
Cheers,Craig
Greetings,
I have been working with OsmocomBB with C155 model.
After a lot of reading and understanding issues on mailing list, following
the right instructions I am unable to understand where the problem is -
cable or the locked tracfone C155 or my setup.
I was successfully able to build the project.
I am stuck on executing the following command
~/osmocom-bb/src/host/osmocon# ./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c155
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e99/layer1.compalram.bin
<No output at all>
<Even on slight push on power button no output>
Please find my specifications and findings below:
1. C155 locked tracfone.
2. FTDI adapter USB serial from - Fonefunshop
Is there a way to test the FTDI adapter ?
dmesg - list that FTDI adapter attached to ttyUSB0.
FTDI VCP driver is built into the Linux kernel. Do I need D2XX driver ?
3. I'm trying to write the firmware (layer1) with a working GSM sim inside
and not tracfone sim card.
4. strace gives me no trouble other than this access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap",
F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) - Is it a worry ?
5. When I execute ./osmocon with all necessary params.
I open a new console and type the following ./osmoload memdump 0x000000
0x2000 dump. - Is this valid at this point? just to see where the actual
firmware is located at?
Dumping 12288 bytes of memory at 0x0 to file dump - Nothing gets dumped into
file dump
Although, I see some output - 'got 2 bytes from modem... ' in the osmocon
window - ./osmocon
It would be very kind if someone could guide me.
How do I verify there is a cable issue <Any software to test TX> since I
have bought these and if not the cable them am I doing something wrong ?
Looking forward to the reply!
Thanks,
Gerard.
--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/OsmocomBB-C155-stuck-at-flashing…
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
My advice you is to stop waiting for someone, who will help you.
Just try to dig into the source code yourself, it's interesting!
And in case of any successes, patches are welcome.
With best regards,
Vadim Yanitskiy.
Hey, I finally watched Nico's talk "let me answer that for you" and heard him say he ported layer2/3 to target.
Also found a mailing list message about him cleaning it up and putting it up on git and sending it to a few folks.
Did that code ever get shared? Would be cool to play around with and is certainly something I would eventually want to accomplish for my project of making a phone that works by itself.
-Craig
Dear all,
I have been testing the mobile app for some time but I faced a small problem where not all my sim cards work fine when listening to paging messages. I have seen the patch presented by Harald Welte and I printed the value of ‘tn’ and found out that it is always 0 whatever the IMSI of the sim card is. Did I miss something or is the paging group part still not implemented in the mobile app.
I really appreciate any help.
Hi Robert,
There are many possible issues, which can cause your problem.
So, it would be good to see more details. Please, prepare two
measurements using cell_log application: one inside any
building, and another one outside. Attach both outputs from
the cell_log and from the osmocon.
I have several phones, and some of them have different RX
signal level. I think, it's due to individual calibration
tables, which aren't used in OsmocomBB firmware.
BTW: if your phone's case is open, make sure that antenna is
connected to the phone's board.
With best regards,
Vadim Yanitskiy.
Hi,
when using the mobile app I cannot connect to the BTS unless I get my phone outside any building, although when using the original firmware I can connect from inside my room. Is there a way to increase the sensitivity of the phone ?
Hi lists!
It's no secret for everyone, that today OsmocomBB is not actively maintained
as well as OpenBSC, for example. I think it's mostly due to supported
hardware
limitations. Currently supported platforms is still a bit of 'black box'.
Moreover every day it's harder to find and buy a new one.
Fortunately, there are many SDR platforms available now. Especially
interesting
devices are USRP, UmTRX, bladeRF, and recently introduced LimeSDR. They can
be
easily programmed to support just about any type of wireless standard, of
course,
including some mobile telecommunication stacks. As well as for network side
back-end,
they can be used to perform MS side operations, excepting frequency-hopping
and some
phone specific features (like SIM I/O).
So, I think there is a way to bring a new live to, amazing child of the
Osmocom
umbrella, OsmocomBB. We can make one work on SDR hardware platforms
implementing
a 'bridge' between both already implemented L2/L3 and OsmoTRX. I know that
there
already was some attempts (see sylvain/ms-sdr branch) to make described
dreams
come true, but development was stopped. And now I am going to start to work
around
this direction.
What for?
- GPRS and EDGE support
- More flexible voice routing
- Multi SIM support
- Next generation networks support (UMTS, LTE)
- ...
Currently I am looking for developers interested in this subject. So, any
ideas
and contributions are welcome! Together we can realize all the things
faster and
create a new area of research and development. Also for me it's very
important to
know opinions of Osmocom community members and exactly OsmocomBB
founders/developers.
Thanks!
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.
Hi all,
I have been using C123 for a long time with FTDI cable.
I recently bought a C139 on which I wanted to run layer1 fw, i check the SW
version using #02# and software version is "1.3.29", UART Flag is "0"
On going through the mailing list I found these to be sufficient for using
osmocom-bb but some how there is a problem on loading.
When I use the fwg command
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c140 -c
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e86/layer1.highram.bin
I get the following
got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 04 81 ..
got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 41 ....A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
read_file(chainloader): file_size=32, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=15341
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C
Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/15341)
handle_write(): 3053 bytes (15341/15341)
handle_write(): finished
It receives prompt2 and loads the file but doesn't move ahead, the phone
does not show layer1 on the screen either.
when i use fwg command (add -m c140xor )
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c140xor -c
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e86/layer1.highram.bin
I get the fwg:
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 04 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 81 .
got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 41 ....A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
read_file(chainloader): file_size=32, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=15341
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C
Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/15341)
handle_write(): 3053 bytes (15341/15341)
handle_write(): finished
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 03 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 57 W
Received MAGIC NACK from phone, you need to have "1003" at 0x803ce0
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6c l
Received FTMTOOL from phone, ramloader has aborted
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 65 e
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
It now move ahead and says the received MAGIC NACK and also that you need
to have "1003" at 0x803ce0, this is a documented problem and i believe in
compal_e86 binaries must have been taken care of.
Any ideas on how can I get around this and load the firmware on my c139 ? I
am again usung the same cable FTDI which works perfectly with c123.
My setup is native Ubuntu 14.04 , host machine and Intel i5.. (hw does not
seem to be the problem)
Looking forward to hear from you guys. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ajay
merlinsignals.blogspot.in
Hi all,
I have been using C123 for a long time with FTDI cable.
I recently bought a C139 on which I wanted to run layer1 fw, i check the SW
version using #02# and software version is "1.3.29", UART Flag is "0"
On going through the mailing list I found these to be sufficient for using
osmocom-bb but some how there is a problem on loading.
When I use the fwg command
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c140 -c
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e86/layer1.highram.bin
I get the following
got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 04 81 ..
got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 41 ....A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
read_file(chainloader): file_size=32, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=15341
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C
Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/15341)
handle_write(): 3053 bytes (15341/15341)
handle_write(): finished
It receives prompt2 and loads the file but doesn't move ahead, the phone
does not show layer1 on the screen either.
when i use fwg command (add -m c140xor )
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c140xor -c
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e86/layer1.highram.bin
I get the fwg:
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 04 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 81 .
got 5 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b f6 02 00 41 ....A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
read_file(chainloader): file_size=32, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=15341
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 43 C
Received PROMPT2 from phone, starting download
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (4096/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (8192/15341)
handle_write(): 4096 bytes (12288/15341)
handle_write(): 3053 bytes (15341/15341)
handle_write(): finished
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 02 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 03 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 57 W
Received MAGIC NACK from phone, you need to have "1003" at 0x803ce0
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6c l
Received FTMTOOL from phone, ramloader has aborted
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 65 e
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
It now move ahead and says the received MAGIC NACK and also that you need
to have "1003" at 0x803ce0, this is a documented problem and i believe in
compal_e86 binaries must have been taken care of.
Any ideas on how can I get around this and load the firmware on my c139 ? I
am again usung the same cable FTDI which works perfectly with c123.
My setup is native Ubuntu 14.04 , host machine and Intel i5.. (hw does not
seem to be the problem)
Looking forward to hear from you guys. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ajay
merlinsignals.blogspot.in
I am the project lead for the SHAKTI open source processor project.
See bitbucket.org/casl
This is a large Indian processor development effort that aims to develop
a range of processors (from uController to high end servers) based
on the RISCV ISA. We work closely with UCB and Cambridge as part of this
effort.
As part of our processor family, we have just started on a mobile SoC.
The goal is to have an octa core SoC with the performance of a
snapdragon 820 or the Apple A9. the CPU core is pretty much under
control but we are exploring the DSP needed for running the lower levels
of the 3G/LTE stack.
Another group does LTE stacks and so we have complete testing equipment
available to test for compliance.
I am basically looking for co-conspirators who can help identify the
components
I can use from the osmocom stack and figure out what else we need to
develop.
Then of course we need to develop the DSP core. We are currently reusing
the UCB vector processor and we are trying to figure out if a vector thread
processor or
a conventional DSP will do the trick.
Our goal is to have am SoC that will the functionality of a basic smart
phone
but we do not intend to focus only on a basic phone with voice/data
ca[ability but with basic display (even 4 line display is OK). Plan to use
the
AD SDR board for the SDR section. So it will be a large board that is
not optimized for size.
Any comments, thoughts appreciated . In case you are wondering, yes we
realize
this a mammoth task but we are well funded ! This is part of the India
processor project. And most importantly all our work will be patent free
open source. HW will be BSD, SW will be GPL3/2
--
Regards,
Madhu
I found a 1900 band analog booster/repeater to try.
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Erich Dachleger <edachleger(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Does anybody know if it would be possible to use some of the old vodaphone-femtocells together with openbsc/osmo-bts?
> RegardsErich
>
> Den Mandag, 23. mai 2016 11.46 skrev etienne . <etiennehelluy(a)gmail.com>:
>
>
> Short answer: no & no
> 1 - A gsm repeater is an analog device. With osmocom-bb phones you would need to demodulate/remodulate bursts.
> This wi
Hi guys,
I have a lot of problems using osmocom-bb with an Openmoko GTA02. First of all, I followed all the instructions from here [1] and uploaded layer1.highram.bin via external jack serial port (second tutorial). Well, after the firmware is downloaded on the phone osmocon prints:
"
Finished, sent 54 blocks in total
Received branch ack, your code is running now!
"
and nothing is printed anymore. Moreover, I see no activity on the serial port, all LEDs on my USB adapter being off.
When I try to run cell_log from my PC, it prints the following error message and blocks / does nothing:
"
Failed to connect to '/tmp/osmocom_sap'.
Failed during sap_open(), no SIM reader
<000e> cell_log.c:804 Scanner initialized
Mobile initialized, please start phone now!
"
I've read about this error and figured out that it is not fatal, but still cell_log doesn't work, nor does the 'mobile' application. I tried the code from master and from sylvain/testing branch and I uncommented "CONFIG_TX_ENABLE". I even tried hello_world.highram.bin and that doesn't print anything after loading it. I don't know what to do anymore.
[1] http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OpenMoko#no1
Hello everyone!
During power measurement process we can see some messages like:
PM MEAS: ARFCN=8, 55 dBm at baseband, -83 dBm at RF
If I understood correctly, in this example received signal has
-83 dBm (about 5e-12 W) strength before amplifier and 55 dBm
(about 316.2 W) strength after one. It looks like the strength
of amplified signal should be printed as -55 (about 3.2e-9 W),
because 316.2 W is very high value. Am I right? Or is it internal
signal strength representation used by DSP?
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.
Dear all, I vae the C115 with a T1 USB to Serial cable with the Prolific
chipset.
When i run osmocon i get :- an its just sits there with no further
processing.
./osmocon -p /dev/ttyUSB0 -m c123xor
../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin
read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin):
file_size=17120, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=17127
read_file(../../target/firmware/board/compal_e88/loader.compalram.bin):
file_size=17120, hdr_len=4, dnload_len=17127
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 2 bytes from modem, data looks like: 2f 00 /.
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 1b .
got 3 bytes from modem, data looks like: f6 02 00 ...
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 41 A
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 01 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 40 @
Received PROMPT1 from phone, responding with CMD
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 66 f
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6d m
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 74 t
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6c l
Received FTMTOOL from phone, ramloader has aborted
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 65 e
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 6f o
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 72 r
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
got 1 bytes from modem, data looks like: 00 .
I think the cable is ok as when i run my fingers on the tip i get random
Zeros so it appears to be talking to the cable.
Also when i tried to run Mobile i get the :- even though i created the
Mobile.cfg file in /etc/osmoco
Failed to parse the config file: '/home/raz/.osmocom/bb/mobile.cfg'
Please check or create config file using: 'touch
/home/raz/.osmocom/bb/mobile.cfg'
I have spent some hours researching the lists and trying various things to
no avail but I want to continue until I resolve this issues and use this
great stack to learn about the GSM network.
Please advise.
Great full for any help or pointers but this maybe a timing issue that is
difficult to debug.
Thanks
Raz
> What are your ideas to make this database alive?
I think we can make it more friendly to user. What do you think about
merging both TAC and terminal-profile databases? One common DB
and one web-interface seems good for me.
Also I am thinking about implementation of a simple Java cardlet
which will be aimed to extract device's profile and provide the results
through SIM-menu. In this case everything that user need is get one
programmable SIM and install this app.
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.
2016-05-21 10:13 GMT+06:00 Kévin Redon <kevredon(a)mail.tsaitgaist.info>:
> What are your ideas to make this database alive?
>
> The easiest way to get the terminal profile of a phone is to monitor the
> SIM interface. To automate that a script to be used along with SIMtrace is
> provided. Alternatively you can use the email address.
> Currently the database it is not very active because no one is submitting
> entries since it's not as easy as getting a TAC/IMEI.
> I also kind of like read only. It keeps external from messing around with
> it.
> But I'm happy to here what you have to propose.
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:13:56AM +0600, Вадим Яницкий wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it would be cool to "make alive" the terminal-profile database.
> > Currently it can be visited in readonly mode:
> >
> > https://terminal-profile.osmocom.org/
> >
> > I can make a page simular to http://tacdb.osmocom.org/ where
> > anybody will be abble to contribute and download the lastest
> > version of database.
> >
> > But before I begin, I would like to know your opinions.
> >
> > С наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Яницкий Вадим.
>
Hi,
I think it would be cool to "make alive" the terminal-profile database.
Currently it can be visited in readonly mode:
https://terminal-profile.osmocom.org/
I can make a page simular to http://tacdb.osmocom.org/ where
anybody will be abble to contribute and download the lastest
version of database.
But before I begin, I would like to know your opinions.
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.
Hi,
While experimenting with the calypsoBTS using a Motorola C118, I noticed that the transceiver always stops after a few minutes and displays the following messages:
<0011> trx.c:419 TRX Control recv: |POWEROFF|
<0011> trx.c:220 TRX Control send: |RSP POWEROFF 0|
Does anyone know what is causing this problem?
Best regards,
Robert,
Hello,
I am facing an issue with the mobile app inside osmocom-bb.
I checked with gr-gsm that my telecom operator changes the Kc ( by sending
auth request) every 5 events (call or sms).
But with the same sim card, I can see on Wireshark connected to the mobile
app, the osmocom-bb phone received an auth request before every event. So my
guess something causes the BTS to send a new auth request but only with
osmocom-bb mobile app.
I checked the source code, i found the option "force-rekey". Even with this
option in mobile.cfg disabled I got the same issue. I saw that when enabled
this option set the key sequence to 7.
I tried with the latest version of osmocombb/libosmocore. Even with previous
version from 2012 and last 2011 both osmocom-bb/libosmocore, different
computer/ different phone (C123, c118 and c139), different cables (I use a
shielded FTDI and a CP2102).
Has anybody faced the same situation ? Have you an idea from where it can
come from ?
Thank you for your help
Frank
Hi everyone, I just got today a Motorola C118 with a CP2102 interface, so I’ve cloned and compiled the osmocom-bb and started playing with it, everything looked great ( osmocon working, hello world app, rssi and so forth, everything 100% perfect ).
Then I started following this page http://osmocom.org/projects/baseband/wiki/Flashing_new <http://osmocom.org/projects/baseband/wiki/Flashing_new>
Until I reached the point where the menu.e88loader.bin file was referenced … I don’t have this file (I’m on the master branch), so I closed every tabs of the terminal to search which branch contained that file.
Problem is, I’ve executed all the commands prior to this one:
host/osmocon/osmoload fprogram 0 0x012000 target/firmware/board/compal_e88/menu.e88loader.bin
( also saved the original loader ) and now the phone doesn’t turn on anymore, neither osmocon is able to detect it … so I guess it’s bricked? is there any way to unbrick it?
Thanks for your help.
Dear attendees of OsmoDevCon 2016,
below are some updates regarding OsmoDevCon 2016
= Lunch Catering =
OsmoDevCon lunch catering has been finalized by now. I wanted to
try some change by having (authentic) thai food, but unfortunately that
didn't work out and we're back to our trusted old suppliers for all of
the lunches. More details are available on
http://projects.osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki/OsmoDevCon2016
= Dinner Catering =
In terms of dinner catering, we didn't plan/schedule anything yet. I
know it was a request to have it and we introduced it (last year?) but
I didn't have time to actively look for a sponsor for this in 2016,
sorry.
If you think it's important, I can try to get something organized for
dinner too, but there's not much time left. It might be easier to
simply go out in 2-3 groups, order pizza from the place down the road or
even place a larger 'a la carte' order from another place.
= Schedule / Talks =
Thre's already a list of topics listed at the wiki, specifically:
http://projects.osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki/OsmoDevCon2016#TalksDiscu…
I think we still have plenty of slots for talks, presentations,
discussions, workshops, you name it.
Each of you: Please take some time to think about
a) topics that you would be able to contribute to the event by
giving a talk or leading a discussion or workshop
b) topics that you would like to hear about from somebody else
Even if we do the actual scheduling ad-hoc at the event itself, it still
is useful to have some advance notice about the topics, as the
speaker(s) will need to prepare accordingly.
= Attendance =
If you have registered but will not attend, please let us know as we can
still adjust the amount of food we get delivered, and we might offer
your seat to somebody else.
If you did not register but are an active contributor to the project(s)
and would like to attend, let me know, too. I will let you know if
somebody cancels their attendance.
Looking forward to meeting all of you in Berlin soon.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi,
we are now running our own copy of patchwork at https://patchwork.osmocom.org. In addition to single patches this version can track series and has a REST API and git-pw client support. The system is currently subscribed to the GPRS, OpenBSC and OsmocomBB mailinglist.
The installation is running offlineimap every couple of minutes to fetch new mail, this means it can take some minutes for your comment or patch to be visible.
kind regards
holger
I'm trying to flash the EMI app on a C140 using this tutorial:
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/flashing_new
I can't fine menu.e86loader.bin file so I've flashed the menu.compalram.bin
instead.
All seem to be fine, but if I press the power button the screen doesn't turn on.
I've made this procedure many times, but without success.
Instead if I flash it in the ram, it work great.
Why?
Hi,
Is is possible to record a specific call using osmocombb? I want to record a call being made on the osmocombb phone not to sniff calls over the air.
Best regards,
Robert,
Dear all,
I suggest to change a stock Redmine theme to something more beautiful,
for example gitmike: https://github.com/makotokw/redmine-theme-gitmike
which used by srlabs.de and looks like pretty. Furthermore, the Osmocom
logo will look better on light background.
Opinions?
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.
Hallo zusammen,
ich wollte toolchain auf meinem Backtrack5r3 als VM installieren, dabei sind
Fehler aufgetreten die ich nicht verstehe.
Wie kann ich da Abhilfe schaffen?
Bis hierhin war noch alles gut.
GNU ARM toolchain
This page will describe the procedure for compiling a GNU ARM toolchain. We
will build a toolchain consisting of:
* GCC 4.8.2
* Binutils 2.21.1
* Newlib 1.19
Getting the buildscript
First of all, create a directory you want to use for building the toolchain,
and download the buildscript
<http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/GnuArmToolchain/gnu-arm-buil
d.3.sh> gnu-arm-build.3.sh there. You will need to make it executable:
$ chmod +x gnu-arm-build.3.sh
Dependencies
In order to build the toolchain, you will need to install the following
packages (assuming you're using a Debian-based distribution):
$ sudo apt-get install build-essential libgmp3-dev libmpfr-dev libx11-6
libx11-dev texinfo flex bison libncurses5 \
libncurses5-dbg libncurses5-dev libncursesw5 libncursesw5-dbg
libncursesw5-dev zlibc zlib1g-dev libmpfr4 libmpc-dev
Preparation
Open a shell in the directory of gnu-arm-build.sh and create the following
directories:
$ mkdir build install src
Download the needed sources to src/:
$ cd src/
$ wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8.2/gcc-4.8.2.tar.bz2
$ wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.1a.tar.bz2
$ wget ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/newlib-1.19.0.tar.gz
Building the toolchain
$ cd ..
$ ./gnu-arm-build.3.sh
I will build an arm-none-eabi cross-compiler:
Prefix: <YOURPATH>/install
Sources: <YOURPATH>/src
Build files: <YOURPATH>/build
Press ^C now if you do NOT want to do this.
Dann kam folgendes, als wenn er Probleme mit den Ordnern hatte.
cid:image001.jpg@01D17613.420C17C0
Könnt ihr mir weiterhelfen?
Gruß Peseta3
hi,
i did a lot of resarch and testing on cell selection and re-selection
process the last two week.
the cell selection process, network selection process (manual and
automatic) and mobility management process were already implemented in
OsmocomBB a long time, but turned out to be buggy and incomplete. i made
test drives to check the process and debugged it.
the re-selection process is new. it is used to track surrounding cells
while listening to the BCCH of the current cell (camping on a cell).
special extension to the layer1 firmare is used to measure neighbour
cells. if an neighbour cell becomes 'better', the mobile switches to
that cell, depening on different criteria. now it is possible to move
with OsmocomBB.
the re-selection process is not handover! handover is a process where a
phone switches between cells while doing a call. handover is one next
step to implement. the process is a little more complex, because it
requires not only neighbour cell measurements, but also syncing to them
without interrupting the traffic channel. most layer 3 stuff of handover
is already implemented.
if you like to play and test your moving OsmocomBB, you can check out
the "jolly/roaming" branch. it contains the extension to layer1, as well
as sim reader and fixes from "sylvain/testing" branch. use both "mobile"
and "layer1" firmware from this branch.
in order to see some process at VTY, you can do:
enable
monitor network 1 (continously display the strongest cell and neighbour
cells)
show ms 1 (to see current states)
show neighbour-cells 1 (to see a more detailed current list of
neighbours)
andreas
Hi,
I would first like to thank all those who participated in this nice
project.
I recently started working with osmocombb and was able to have it working
fine on a motorola c118.
However, I noticed that some sim cards can connect normally to the BTS, can
make calls and send SMS but can’t receive anything. They simply don't get
paged. While for some other sim cards everything seems to be working fine.
Does anyone know what might be causing this issue ?
thanks,
Robert
Can it be done without using LCR ?
On Mar 4, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Dennis Eisenbarth <dennis.eisenbarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It should not be a problem.
>
> Have a nice day,
> Dennis
>
> On 03.03.2016 18:47, robert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is is possible to record a specific call using osmocombb? I want to record a call being made on the osmocombb phone not to sniff calls over the air.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Robert,
>
On Mar 4, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Dennis Eisenbarth <dennis.eisenbarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It should not be a problem.
>
> Have a nice day,
> Dennis
>
> On 03.03.2016 18:47, robert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is is possible to record a specific call using osmocombb? I want to record a call being made on the osmocombb phone not to sniff calls over the air.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Robert,
>
Hello,
I hope that this email finds you in good health. I am working on
implementing the call handover part of mobility management in the OsmocomBB
code as part of my Senior Year Project in University. I would like to ask
you a few things about what you have implemented. Your help will guide me a
lot in my endeavor. Please let me know whenever we can skype or call.
Thanks and Regards,
Ahmed
Hi,
in the osmocom bb mobile.cfg I don't see any posibility to set a fixed
Kc encryption key and the tmsi.
How could I achieve that osmocom uses my defined Kc and tmsi?
cheers,
Simian
Look at this strings from your log:
<0005> subscriber.c:601 Requesting SIM file 0x2fe2
<000f> sim.c:209 got new job: SIM_JOB_READ_BINARY (handle=00000004)
<000f> sim.c:697 go MF
<000f> sim.c:241 SELECT (file=0x3f00)
<000f> sim.c:187 sending APDU (class 0xa0, ins 0xa4)
<000f> sim.c:876 received APDU (len=0 sw1=0x00 sw2=0x00)
<000f> sim.c:952 command failed
<000f> sim.c:151 sending result to callback function (type=1)
<0005> subscriber.c:657 SIM reading failed
Maybe something wrong with your SIM? Try another one.
Are you at the master branch?
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Яницкий Вадим.