On 08 Jun 2016, at 12:36, Prasad Kaup Prasad.Kaup@radisys.com wrote:
Hello All,
Hi!
We have executed profiling test of two versions of algorithm for decoding compressed bitmap of EPDAN.From the results , we see that performance is better in Tree based decoding (Version2 as given below ) Version 1: Bitmap based decoding as present in current master branch ( Function name osmo_t4_decode ) Version 2: Tree based decoding ( Function name decompress_crbb , as proposed in patch “Decompress the CRBB bitmap using tree based approach” )
A sample bitmap taken from a real mobile log is used for the test. Host execution: Time taken to decode (micro seconds) Version 1: (Bitmap based decoding) : MIN -17 MAX -19 AVERAGE -17.9 Version 2 (tree based decoding): MIN -4 MAX -13 AVERAGE - 5.2
Target execution: Time taken to decode (micro seconds) Version 1: (Bitmap based decoding) : MIN -277 MAX -583 AVERAGE - 353 Version 2 (tree based decoding): MIN -67 MAX -86 AVERAGE – 69.8
please release the benchmark and the test data so one can re-measure and see where time is spent.
thank you holger