Sylvain Munaut wrote:
How was it
incorrect before?
According to specs, enum types _can_ be unsigned and so the test
would be always false.
Ok. I thought perhaps the first enum was set to 0, which guarantees
that all following enums are positive integers.
They are all positive integers ...
That's only certain if one enum value is defined to >= 0, and no
later enum is defined to < 0. If no enum value is defined at all,
then they may very well be negative.
And since the enum type in this case is unsigned, an
unsigned value
can never be inferior to 0 and so the test is always false.
enums don't have signedness AFAIU?
//Peter