26 Apr
2016
26 Apr
'16
1:14 p.m.
Thanks. Comments are inline.
On 04/26/2016 01:06 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:35:57PM +0200,
msuraev(a)sysmocom.de wrote:
Yes.
- void *priv; /* user reference */
+ uint8_t trx;
So I presume you are certain that priv was so far only used for the
trx
number, that there are no other callers using priv, and that it makes
sense to not have a priv pointer anymore? Looking at the patch it does look like priv was never
really a priv in the
arbitrary-backpointer case, but IMHO it would be good to clarify that in
the log message.
Noted.
- int rc = 0;
- int trx, ts;
- int i;
+ int rc = 0, ts, i;
Unrelated cosmetic change, keep that out of this patch, i.e.
only remove
the trx int, the point being that I noticed only on the second glance. Also I believe we prefer to have each variable on its
own line.
It doesn't look that way from looking at the other code. It also
decreases readability by cluttering the code with useless repetitions.
--
Max Suraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte