On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:32 AM, jiangwy <wyjiang(a)ljshuoda.com> wrote:
kal: Scanning for GSM-900 base stations.
-- Loaded /home/gsmrlab/.uhd/cal/rx_iq_cal_v0.1_38.A.csv
chan: 9 (936.8MHz - 613Hz) power: 6418.15
chan: 12 (937.4MHz - 620Hz) power: 12117.75
chan: 83 (951.6MHz - 643Hz) power: 6134.54
chan: 84 (951.8MHz - 650Hz) power: 6960.67
chan: 85 (952.0MHz - 637Hz) power: 6300.51
chan: 86 (952.2MHz - 689Hz) power: 6887.63
chan: 88 (952.6MHz - 638Hz) power: 8117.66
chan: 90 (953.0MHz - 675Hz) power: 8154.05
chan: 92 (953.4MHz - 607Hz) power: 19237.80
chan: 93 (953.6MHz - 644Hz) power: 5920.77
chan: 95 (954.0MHz - 599Hz) power: 6156.47
chan: 97 (954.4MHz - 653Hz) power: 6850.15
chan: 99 (954.8MHz - 621Hz) power: 9758.86
chan: 101 (955.2MHz - 611Hz) power: 14142.66
chan: 103 (955.6MHz - 612Hz) power: 8194.55
chan: 105 (956.0MHz - 622Hz) power: 6900.42
chan: 106 (956.2MHz - 605Hz) power: 5699.32
chan: 109 (956.8MHz - 618Hz) power: 6037.80
chan: 110 (957.0MHz - 609Hz) power: 5979.92
chan: 112 (957.4MHz - 621Hz) power: 6714.83
chan: 114 (957.8MHz - 616Hz) power: 7686.20
chan: 116 (958.2MHz - 628Hz) power: 8990.54
chan: 118 (958.6MHz - 627Hz) power: 6750.71
chan: 120 (959.0MHz - 607Hz) power: 6218.47
chan: 124 (959.8MHz - 642Hz) power: 6230.74
The offsets look fine, but Kal is reporting an extremely dense GSM
environment. I wonder if some of these are false values. May I ask
where these measurements were taken?
Thomas