Attention is currently required from: neels.
laforge has posted comments on this change by neels. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/38333?usp=email )
Change subject: fix memleak in ran_decode: free after aper_decode() on error
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/38333?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-iuh
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idd1d10c523eddcf6d0c1d54346982d6ef6fc3799
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38333
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:47:28 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge.
neels has posted comments on this change by neels. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/37393?usp=email )
Change subject: support RAB Assignment Response 'unsuccessfulOutcome'
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/37393/comment/bde17021_00cd426c?usp… :
PS2, Line 30: cn_ranap_rx_successful_msg_co().
> Decoding is also present in cn_ranap_rx_outcome_msg_co()
I figured out the mixup, now it makes sense
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/37393?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-iuh
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifec566a98cb6141d27b9e5e33d5a78f8b1530658
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37393
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 02:39:47 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, neels.
Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, laforge,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/37393?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#3).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by daniel, Code-Review+1 by laforge, Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder
Change subject: support RAB Assignment Response 'unsuccessfulOutcome'
......................................................................
support RAB Assignment Response 'unsuccessfulOutcome'
Already present before this patch:
- decoding 'successfulOutcome' in cn_ranap_rx_successful_msg_co()
- decoding 'outcome' in cn_ranap_rx_outcome_msg_co()
In this patch, add:
- decoding 'unsuccessfulOutcome' in cn_ranap_rx_unsuccessful_msg_co()
Context:
A RAB Assignment response is indicated as
'successfulOutcome' or 'unsuccessfulOutcome' or 'outcome'.
3GPP TS 25.413 specifies RAB Assignment as a "Class 3 Elementary
Procedure", but doesn't seem to specify which of these three 'outcome'
types to use for Class 3. In the field we've seen 'successfulOutcome'
and 'outcome'.
A RAB Assignment response may actually contain responses for multiple
RABs, and each of them can have a separate success or failure status. It
seems that 'outcome' might be intended for such mixed responses.
Either one is fine, because the included RAB Assignment Response IEs are
always in the same format, regardless of the outcome type.
Change-Id: Ifec566a98cb6141d27b9e5e33d5a78f8b1530658
---
M src/ranap_common_cn.c
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-iuh refs/changes/93/37393/3
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-iuh/+/37393?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: osmo-iuh
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifec566a98cb6141d27b9e5e33d5a78f8b1530658
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37393
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: falconia.
pespin has posted comments on this change by falconia. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/38331?usp=email )
Change subject: trau: detect 8k AMR 7.40k frames correctly for decoding
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/38331?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-abis
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iad527d4141cf4d76feea56399ea1916813e1e941
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38331
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 21:47:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes