Attention is currently required from: laforge.
neels has posted comments on this change by neels. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/39600?usp=email )
Change subject: utils: add unrpad()
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/osmocom/utils.py:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/39600/comment/2a325dac_eb17… :
PS1, Line 125: """unpad string on the right side -- reverse of rpad().
> in which way is this different from the python standard library string. […]
hmm indeed .. still find it nice to have something called "unrpad()", after all rpad() is just val + c * (l - len(val)) ... but will just use rstrip in pysim, then, and avoid trivial dependencies.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/39600?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: python/pyosmocom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I48c23390926f8c9412624edb4481e7f4cd3f4b46
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39600
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:55:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith.
Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: Fix setting traffic-mode 'round-robin' over VTY
......................................................................
Fix setting traffic-mode 'round-robin' over VTY
String in osmo_ss7_as_traffic_mode_vals[] is "round-robin" while string
in VTY command was "roundrobin", so it didn't really match when set over
VTY. This has apparently broken for really long, I couldn't find the
originating commit breaking this.
Change-Id: I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
---
M src/osmo_ss7_vty.c
M tests/vty/osmo_stp_test.vty
M tests/vty/ss7_asp_test.vty
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-sigtran refs/changes/50/39650/3
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39650
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith.
Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#2).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder
Change subject: Fix setting traffic-mode 'round-robin' over VTY
......................................................................
Fix setting traffic-mode 'round-robin' over VTY
Change-Id: I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
---
M src/osmo_ss7_vty.c
M tests/vty/osmo_stp_test.vty
M tests/vty/ss7_asp_test.vty
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-sigtran refs/changes/50/39650/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39650
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/39651?usp=email )
Change subject: stp: Fix brokeness in TC_tmt_loadshare
......................................................................
stp: Fix brokeness in TC_tmt_loadshare
The test was not even setting the traffic-mode in the UIT.
Furthermore, it was expecting pure round-robin behavior, which was the
older behavior of osmo-stp when loadshare traffic-mode was selected.
Actually split the test into 2, naming them properly (since round robin
is not a AS traffic mode in itself, but a possible implementation of the
loadshare traffic-mode.
The new test validates the usual loadshare traffic-mode based on SLS
distribution.
Related: SYS#7112
Depends: libosmo-sigtran.git Change-Id I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
Change-Id: I16d81cb2f88bb2927f248182ad4f8f27c8c24859
---
M stp/STP_Tests_M3UA.ttcn
M stp/expected-results.xml
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/51/39651/1
diff --git a/stp/STP_Tests_M3UA.ttcn b/stp/STP_Tests_M3UA.ttcn
index 3fb3fc0..063256b 100644
--- a/stp/STP_Tests_M3UA.ttcn
+++ b/stp/STP_Tests_M3UA.ttcn
@@ -585,24 +585,24 @@
}
}
-/* test "traffic-mode load-share" behavior */
-testcase TC_tmt_loadshare() runs on RAW_M3UA_CT {
+/* test "traffic-mode roundrobin" behavior (distributing within ASPs of a given AS in roundrobin fashion). */
+testcase TC_tmt_loadshare_roundrobin() runs on RAW_M3UA_CT {
var integer i;
f_init_m3ua();
+ f_vty_config2(VTY, {"cs7 instance 0", "as as-receiver m3ua"}, "traffic-mode round-robin");
+
var OCT4 rctx_sender := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(0).routing_ctx, 4);
var OCT4 pc_sender := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(0).point_code, 4);
var OCT4 rctx_receiver := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(1).routing_ctx, 4);
var OCT4 pc_receiver := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(1).point_code, 4);
- /* FIXME: configure the STP via VTY to set traffic-mode */
-
/* bring up the 'sender' side (single ASP in AS) */
f_M3UA_asp_up_act(0, omit, rctx_sender);
/* activate the first 'receiver' side ASP */
- f_M3UA_asp_up_act(1, c_M3UA_TMT_loadshare, omit); // TODO: rctx
+ f_M3UA_asp_up_act(1, omit, omit); // TODO: rctx
/* verify traffic is routed from sender to [sole] receiver */
for (i := 0; i < 10; i := i+1) {
@@ -610,12 +610,12 @@
}
/* activate the second 'receiver' side ASP (no NOTIFY) */
- f_M3UA_asp_up_act(2, c_M3UA_TMT_loadshare, omit, c_M3UA_ST_I_AS_ACTIVE, omit); // TODO: rctx
+ f_M3UA_asp_up_act(2, omit, omit, c_M3UA_ST_I_AS_ACTIVE, omit); // TODO: rctx
/* verify traffic is routed from sender to new receiver */
const integer iter_per_asp := 5;
var Integers num_rx := {};
- for (i := 0; i < g_m3ua_num_clients; i := i + 1) {
+ for (i := 0; i < 3; i := i + 1) {
num_rx := num_rx & {0};
}
for (i := 0; i < 2*iter_per_asp; i := i+1) {
@@ -640,6 +640,100 @@
setverdict(pass);
f_clear_m3ua();
+
+ f_vty_config2(VTY, {"cs7 instance 0", "as as-receiver m3ua"}, "no traffic-mode");
+}
+
+private altstep as_count_rx_sls(integer idx, template (present) PDU_M3UA exp, inout Integers sls_counter, inout integer rx_counter)
+runs on RAW_M3UA_CT {
+ var M3UA_RecvFrom rx;
+ [] M3UA[idx].receive(t_M3UA_RecvFrom(exp)) -> value rx {
+ var integer sls := oct2int(rx.msg.m3UA_DATA.messageParameters.protocol_Data.sLS);
+ sls_counter[sls] := sls_counter[sls] + 1;
+ rx_counter := rx_counter + 1;
+ }
+}
+
+/* test "traffic-mode load-share" behavior. Validates ASP Loadsharing scenario (distributing traffic within ASPs of one AS).
+ * NOTE: This test does not validate AS Loadsharing, (distributing traffic within linksets/ASs of a combined linkset). */
+testcase TC_tmt_loadshare_sls() runs on RAW_M3UA_CT {
+ var integer i;
+
+ f_init_m3ua();
+
+ f_vty_config2(VTY, {"cs7 instance 0", "as as-receiver m3ua"}, "traffic-mode loadshare");
+
+ var OCT4 rctx_sender := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(0).routing_ctx, 4);
+ var OCT4 pc_sender := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(0).point_code, 4);
+ var OCT4 rctx_receiver := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(1).routing_ctx, 4);
+ var OCT4 pc_receiver := int2oct(f_m3ua_cli_config(1).point_code, 4);
+
+ /* bring up the 'sender' side (single ASP in AS) */
+ f_M3UA_asp_up_act(0, omit, rctx_sender);
+
+ /* activate the first 'receiver' side ASP */
+ f_M3UA_asp_up_act(1, c_M3UA_TMT_loadshare, omit); // TODO: rctx
+
+ /* verify traffic is routed from sender to [sole] receiver */
+ for (i := 0; i < 10; i := i+1) {
+ f_test_traffic(0, rctx_sender, pc_sender, 1, rctx_receiver, pc_receiver);
+ }
+
+ /* activate the second 'receiver' side ASP (no NOTIFY) */
+ f_M3UA_asp_up_act(2, c_M3UA_TMT_loadshare, omit, c_M3UA_ST_I_AS_ACTIVE, omit); // TODO: rctx
+
+ /* verify traffic is routed from sender to new receiver */
+ const integer iter_per_asp := 20;
+ const integer NUM_SLS := 16; /* SLS in ITU is 4 bits. */
+ var integer num_rx_1 := 0;
+ var integer num_rx_2 := 0;
+ var Integers sls_num_rx_1 := {};
+ var Integers sls_num_rx_2 := {};
+ for (i := 0; i < NUM_SLS; i := i + 1) {
+ sls_num_rx_1 := sls_num_rx_1 & {0};
+ sls_num_rx_2 := sls_num_rx_2 & {0};
+ }
+ for (i := 0; i < 2*iter_per_asp; i := i+1) {
+ var octetstring data := f_rnd_octstring_rnd_len(100);
+ var template (value) M3UA_Protocol_Data tx_pd;
+ var template (present) M3UA_Protocol_Data rx_pd;
+ /* Distribute traffic over ASPs based on SLS, since OPC is always the same.
+ * SLS in ITU is 4 bits. */
+ var OCT1 sls := int2oct(i mod 16, 1);
+ tx_pd := ts_M3UA_protocol_data(pc_sender, pc_receiver, '23'O, '00'O, '00'O, sls, data);
+ rx_pd := tr_M3UA_protocol_data(pc_sender, pc_receiver, '23'O, '00'O, '00'O, sls, data);
+ f_M3UA_send(0, ts_M3UA_DATA(rctx_sender, tx_pd), 1);
+ alt {
+ [] as_count_rx_sls(1, tr_M3UA_DATA(rctx_receiver, rx_pd), sls_num_rx_1, num_rx_1);
+ [] as_count_rx_sls(2, tr_M3UA_DATA(rctx_receiver, rx_pd), sls_num_rx_2, num_rx_2);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure traffic was sent over both ASPs and that it was distributed: */
+ if (num_rx_1 == 0) {
+ Misc_Helpers.f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, fail, "Rx 0 packets in 1st ASP!");
+ }
+ if (num_rx_2 == 0) {
+ Misc_Helpers.f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, fail, "Rx 0 packets in 2nd ASP!");
+ }
+ if (num_rx_1 + num_rx_2 != 2*iter_per_asp) {
+ Misc_Helpers.f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, fail,
+ log2str("Rx ", num_rx_1 + num_rx_2 ," packets in total vs exp ", 2*iter_per_asp));
+ }
+
+ /* Check that a given SLS is not forwarded to both ASPs: */
+ for (i := 0; i < NUM_SLS; i := i+1) {
+ if (sls_num_rx_1[i] > 0 and sls_num_rx_2[i] > 0) {
+ Misc_Helpers.f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, fail,
+ log2str("Rx packets for SLS ", i, " in both ASPs!"));
+ }
+
+ }
+ setverdict(pass);
+
+ f_clear_m3ua();
+
+ f_vty_config2(VTY, {"cs7 instance 0", "as as-receiver m3ua"}, "no traffic-mode");
}
/* test "traffic-mode broadcast" behavior */
@@ -1414,7 +1508,8 @@
execute( TC_asp_act_loadshare() );
execute( TC_asp_act_broadcast() );
execute( TC_tmt_override() );
- execute( TC_tmt_loadshare() );
+ execute( TC_tmt_loadshare_roundrobin() );
+ execute( TC_tmt_loadshare_sls() );
execute( TC_tmt_broadcast() );
execute( TC_act_rctx_data_no_rctx() );
diff --git a/stp/expected-results.xml b/stp/expected-results.xml
index bc9c861..a764349 100644
--- a/stp/expected-results.xml
+++ b/stp/expected-results.xml
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_asp_act_loadshare' time='MASKED'/>
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_asp_act_broadcast' time='MASKED'/>
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_tmt_override' time='MASKED'/>
- <testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_tmt_loadshare' time='MASKED'/>
+ <testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_tmt_loadshare_roundrobin' time='MASKED'/>
+ <testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_tmt_loadshare_sls' time='MASKED'/>
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_tmt_broadcast' time='MASKED'/>
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_act_rctx_data_no_rctx' time='MASKED'/>
<testcase classname='STP_Tests_M3UA' name='TC_m3ua_tcp_cli' time='MASKED'/>
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/39651?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I16d81cb2f88bb2927f248182ad4f8f27c8c24859
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39651
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith.
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email )
Change subject: Fix setting traffic-mode 'round-robin' over VTY
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
@laforge@gnumonks.org I don't even get why we have the "round-robin" traffic mode (OSMO_SS7_AS_TMOD_ROUNDROBIN), it doesn't even show up in RFC4666, so it cannot be requested over the wire....
I think this ended up as a confusion. The "round-robin" thing afaiu is actually one of the possible implementations of the "loadshare" traffic mode.
Hence, imho we should:
1- remove the OSMO_SS7_AS_TMOD_ROUNDROBIN field and remove it from "traffic-mode" VTY command too.
2- Add a new "enum osmo_ss7_as_traffic_loadshare_impl" where we have enum fields "SLS" and "ROUNDROBIN", and then in the vty command "loadshare" (see https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39408/6/src/osmo_ss7_vty.c, following Cisco ITP) add a new "traffic-mode loadshare round-robin" (also as specified in Cisco ITP).
So basically, rounrobin vs SLS distributon are options of the "loadshare" traffic mode.
I plan to provide those patches on top of the ASP loadsharing patchset unless somebody has any other opinion.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39650?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I61340549c596f1c04bc2269dbc165c327bf72037
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39650
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:23:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith, pespin.
Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, fixeria, laforge, osmith,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39408?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#6).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder
Change subject: ASP loadsharing: Implement based on VTY configuration
......................................................................
ASP loadsharing: Implement based on VTY configuration
Calculate AS Extended SLS (7 bit) out of OPC (12 bits) and SLS (4 bits)
based on VTY configuration.
Assign a normal destination ASP for each AS-eSLS and try to use it
whenever possible; fallback to an alternative ASP when normal ASP is not
available.
Related: SYS#7112
Change-Id: I5f47e40b70ed566034cd1533b71e21fc03e94f6c
---
M src/osmo_ss7_as.c
M src/osmo_ss7_vty.c
M src/ss7_as.h
M src/xua_as_fsm.c
M tests/vty/osmo_stp_test.vty
5 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-sigtran refs/changes/08/39408/6
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/39408?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sigtran
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5f47e40b70ed566034cd1533b71e21fc03e94f6c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39408
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>